{"title":"未定思想的实践。理性程度理论及其对评论者的回应","authors":"Julia Staffel","doi":"10.1007/s44204-025-00308-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This précis summarizes the main arguments from my book “Unsettled Thoughts. A Theory of Degrees of Rationality.” In my replies to commentators, I explain how the Bayesian framework can deal with evidential situations that are not covered by its standard assumptions, and how this impacts the approximation framework I develop in “Unsettled Thoughts.”</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-025-00308-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Précis of Unsettled Thoughts. A Theory of Degrees of Rationality and Replies to Commentators\",\"authors\":\"Julia Staffel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44204-025-00308-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This précis summarizes the main arguments from my book “Unsettled Thoughts. A Theory of Degrees of Rationality.” In my replies to commentators, I explain how the Bayesian framework can deal with evidential situations that are not covered by its standard assumptions, and how this impacts the approximation framework I develop in “Unsettled Thoughts.”</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-025-00308-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00308-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00308-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Précis of Unsettled Thoughts. A Theory of Degrees of Rationality and Replies to Commentators
This précis summarizes the main arguments from my book “Unsettled Thoughts. A Theory of Degrees of Rationality.” In my replies to commentators, I explain how the Bayesian framework can deal with evidential situations that are not covered by its standard assumptions, and how this impacts the approximation framework I develop in “Unsettled Thoughts.”
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
