少量样品制备SPME-GC-MS直接测定葡萄酒中挥发性同源物

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Anton Korban, Walter Goessler, Radomír Čabala
{"title":"少量样品制备SPME-GC-MS直接测定葡萄酒中挥发性同源物","authors":"Anton Korban,&nbsp;Walter Goessler,&nbsp;Radomír Čabala","doi":"10.1007/s12161-025-02771-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, the “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method was employed for the quantification of volatile congeners in wines using headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) as a way of sampling and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detector (GC–MS) for detection. The “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method is fast, cheap, and simple, and demonstrates good compatibility with green analytical chemistry standards. SPME sampling was performed without sample pre-treatment beyond dilution with water. A series of standard solutions containing 10 commonly encountered wine congeners was prepared gravimetrically to test the method’s linearity and sensitivity. The proposed method was then compared to the traditional internal standard (IS) method, using 1-pentanol as the IS compound. Although the precision and linearity for some compounds were slightly lower when using the proposed method, these issues can be mitigated through further optimisation of the SPME methodology. In terms of accuracy, the proposed method exhibited similar recoveries to the traditional IS method: 98.5 ± 8.8% and 103.4 ± 9.8%, consequently. Ten real wine samples (four white and six red) produced in Austria were simultaneously analysed using both IS methods for comparison. The results of the paired <i>t</i>-test showed that the mean concentrations of individual congeners obtained from both IS methods did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.05), with only one congener exhibiting a statistically significant difference. Given its outstanding practical advantages, the “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method is recommended for wine analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 6","pages":"1066 - 1072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Determination of Volatile Congeners in Wine Using SPME–GC–MS with Minor Sample Preparation\",\"authors\":\"Anton Korban,&nbsp;Walter Goessler,&nbsp;Radomír Čabala\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12161-025-02771-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, the “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method was employed for the quantification of volatile congeners in wines using headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) as a way of sampling and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detector (GC–MS) for detection. The “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method is fast, cheap, and simple, and demonstrates good compatibility with green analytical chemistry standards. SPME sampling was performed without sample pre-treatment beyond dilution with water. A series of standard solutions containing 10 commonly encountered wine congeners was prepared gravimetrically to test the method’s linearity and sensitivity. The proposed method was then compared to the traditional internal standard (IS) method, using 1-pentanol as the IS compound. Although the precision and linearity for some compounds were slightly lower when using the proposed method, these issues can be mitigated through further optimisation of the SPME methodology. In terms of accuracy, the proposed method exhibited similar recoveries to the traditional IS method: 98.5 ± 8.8% and 103.4 ± 9.8%, consequently. Ten real wine samples (four white and six red) produced in Austria were simultaneously analysed using both IS methods for comparison. The results of the paired <i>t</i>-test showed that the mean concentrations of individual congeners obtained from both IS methods did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.05), with only one congener exhibiting a statistically significant difference. Given its outstanding practical advantages, the “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method is recommended for wine analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"1066 - 1072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02771-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02771-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用“以乙醇为内标”的方法,采用顶空固相微萃取(SPME)取样,气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)检测,对葡萄酒中挥发性同源物进行定量分析。乙醇内标法快速、廉价、简便,与绿色分析化学标准具有良好的相容性。SPME取样除用水稀释外,无需样品预处理。用重量法制备了含有10种常见的葡萄酒同系物的一系列标准溶液,以检验该方法的线性度和灵敏度。将该方法与以1-戊醇为内标化合物的传统内标法进行了比较。虽然使用该方法时,某些化合物的精密度和线性略低,但这些问题可以通过进一步优化SPME方法来缓解。准确度方面,该方法的回收率与传统IS方法相似,分别为98.5±8.8%和103.4±9.8%。在奥地利生产的十种真正的葡萄酒样品(四种白葡萄酒和六种红葡萄酒)同时使用两种IS方法进行比较分析。配对t检验结果显示,两种IS方法获得的单个同源基因的平均浓度没有显著差异(p = 0.05),只有一个同源基因有统计学显著差异。鉴于其突出的实用优势,“乙醇内标法”被推荐用于葡萄酒分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct Determination of Volatile Congeners in Wine Using SPME–GC–MS with Minor Sample Preparation

In this study, the “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method was employed for the quantification of volatile congeners in wines using headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) as a way of sampling and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detector (GC–MS) for detection. The “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method is fast, cheap, and simple, and demonstrates good compatibility with green analytical chemistry standards. SPME sampling was performed without sample pre-treatment beyond dilution with water. A series of standard solutions containing 10 commonly encountered wine congeners was prepared gravimetrically to test the method’s linearity and sensitivity. The proposed method was then compared to the traditional internal standard (IS) method, using 1-pentanol as the IS compound. Although the precision and linearity for some compounds were slightly lower when using the proposed method, these issues can be mitigated through further optimisation of the SPME methodology. In terms of accuracy, the proposed method exhibited similar recoveries to the traditional IS method: 98.5 ± 8.8% and 103.4 ± 9.8%, consequently. Ten real wine samples (four white and six red) produced in Austria were simultaneously analysed using both IS methods for comparison. The results of the paired t-test showed that the mean concentrations of individual congeners obtained from both IS methods did not differ significantly (p = 0.05), with only one congener exhibiting a statistically significant difference. Given its outstanding practical advantages, the “Ethanol as an Internal Standard” method is recommended for wine analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信