基于开放数据的2000-2020年中国沿海湿地时空变化及其驱动因素

IF 2.5 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jiangjing Wang, Shiwei Lin, Wenzhen Zhao, Shupu Wu, Lv Gong, Yuanhao Song, Yang Hu, Xiuzhen Li
{"title":"基于开放数据的2000-2020年中国沿海湿地时空变化及其驱动因素","authors":"Jiangjing Wang,&nbsp;Shiwei Lin,&nbsp;Wenzhen Zhao,&nbsp;Shupu Wu,&nbsp;Lv Gong,&nbsp;Yuanhao Song,&nbsp;Yang Hu,&nbsp;Xiuzhen Li","doi":"10.1007/s44218-025-00083-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coastal wetlands face dual threats from climate change and human disturbances, while they provide important ecosystem functions and deliver essential ecosystem services. Exploring the drivers behind coastal wetland changes will benefit sustainable coastal ecosystem management. Based on GlobaLand30 data, this study systematically assessed the spatiotemporal changes and drivers of China’s coastal marsh changes during 2000–2020 by incorporating land-use transformation process and various anthropogenic and environmental factors from public datasets. Our findings revealed a net increase of 865.8 km<sup>2</sup> in coastal marsh area during 2000–2020, with distinct regional variations. Coastal marsh changes were more evident north of 30°N, particularly in the Bohai Rim region (37–41°N) and the Yangtze River Delta (30–33°N). Over 75% of major coastal marsh gains (&gt; 1,250 ha) and losses (&gt; 1,000 ha) based on 25 km<sup>2</sup> hexagonal grids occurred in these two regions during 2000–2020. The increase in the proportion of major coastal marsh loss grids (&gt; 1,000 km<sup>2</sup>) from 80.0% to 89.8% in these two regions during 2010–2020 suggests that some areas continued to deteriorate, highlighting that total area changes may mask important local dynamics. While driving factors varied across latitudes, land reclamation remained the dominant reason for coastal wetland loss. Reclamation induced coastal marsh loss accounting for over 60% of the total losses across all sea regions during different periods. In the Bohai Rim, the latitudinal distribution of marsh losses aligned with aquaculture changes patterns, while marsh gains primarily resulted from ecological recovery. In the East China Sea region where the Yangtze Delta is located, accretion contributed over 65% of total gains during both 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 periods. The areas of significant coastal marsh changes in the East China Sea region spatially overlapped with the distribution range of <i>Spartina alterniflora</i>. Based on the analysis of driving forces and ecological issues, this study proposed region-specific adaptive management strategies. Future research should strengthen the quantitative analysis of multiple driving forces’ interactions to provide a scientific basis for developing more targeted land-sea management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44218-025-00083-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Factors of China’s Coastal Marsh during 2000–2020 based on Open Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Jiangjing Wang,&nbsp;Shiwei Lin,&nbsp;Wenzhen Zhao,&nbsp;Shupu Wu,&nbsp;Lv Gong,&nbsp;Yuanhao Song,&nbsp;Yang Hu,&nbsp;Xiuzhen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44218-025-00083-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Coastal wetlands face dual threats from climate change and human disturbances, while they provide important ecosystem functions and deliver essential ecosystem services. Exploring the drivers behind coastal wetland changes will benefit sustainable coastal ecosystem management. Based on GlobaLand30 data, this study systematically assessed the spatiotemporal changes and drivers of China’s coastal marsh changes during 2000–2020 by incorporating land-use transformation process and various anthropogenic and environmental factors from public datasets. Our findings revealed a net increase of 865.8 km<sup>2</sup> in coastal marsh area during 2000–2020, with distinct regional variations. Coastal marsh changes were more evident north of 30°N, particularly in the Bohai Rim region (37–41°N) and the Yangtze River Delta (30–33°N). Over 75% of major coastal marsh gains (&gt; 1,250 ha) and losses (&gt; 1,000 ha) based on 25 km<sup>2</sup> hexagonal grids occurred in these two regions during 2000–2020. The increase in the proportion of major coastal marsh loss grids (&gt; 1,000 km<sup>2</sup>) from 80.0% to 89.8% in these two regions during 2010–2020 suggests that some areas continued to deteriorate, highlighting that total area changes may mask important local dynamics. While driving factors varied across latitudes, land reclamation remained the dominant reason for coastal wetland loss. Reclamation induced coastal marsh loss accounting for over 60% of the total losses across all sea regions during different periods. In the Bohai Rim, the latitudinal distribution of marsh losses aligned with aquaculture changes patterns, while marsh gains primarily resulted from ecological recovery. In the East China Sea region where the Yangtze Delta is located, accretion contributed over 65% of total gains during both 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 periods. The areas of significant coastal marsh changes in the East China Sea region spatially overlapped with the distribution range of <i>Spartina alterniflora</i>. Based on the analysis of driving forces and ecological issues, this study proposed region-specific adaptive management strategies. Future research should strengthen the quantitative analysis of multiple driving forces’ interactions to provide a scientific basis for developing more targeted land-sea management strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropocene Coasts\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44218-025-00083-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropocene Coasts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44218-025-00083-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44218-025-00083-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滨海湿地在提供重要生态系统功能和基本生态系统服务的同时,也面临着气候变化和人为干扰的双重威胁。探索沿海湿地变化背后的驱动因素将有利于沿海生态系统的可持续管理。基于GlobaLand30数据,结合土地利用转化过程和各种人为环境因素,系统评估了2000-2020年中国沿海沼泽变化的时空变化及其驱动因素。结果表明,2000-2020年沿海沼泽面积净增加865.8 km2,区域差异明显。沿海沼泽变化在30°N以北更为明显,特别是在环渤海地区(37 ~ 41°N)和长三角地区(30 ~ 33°N)。在2000-2020年期间,超过75%的主要沿海沼泽收益(1250公顷)和损失(1000公顷)发生在这两个地区(按25平方公里六边形网格计算)。2010-2020年,这两个地区主要沿海沼泽损失网格(1,000 km2)的比例从80.0%增加到89.8%,表明一些地区继续恶化,突出表明总面积变化可能掩盖了重要的局部动态。虽然不同纬度地区的驱动因素不同,但土地开垦仍然是沿海湿地损失的主要原因。在不同时期,围垦引起的沿海沼泽损失占所有海域总损失的60%以上。环渤海地区湿地损失的纬向分布与水产养殖变化规律一致,湿地增收主要是生态恢复的结果。在长江三角洲所在的东海地区,2000-2010年和2010-2020年期间,海洋增殖量对总增殖量的贡献均超过65%。东海地区滨海湿地变化显著的区域与互花米草的分布范围在空间上重叠。在分析驱动力和生态问题的基础上,提出了区域适应性管理策略。未来的研究应加强对多种驱动力相互作用的定量分析,为制定更有针对性的陆海管理战略提供科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Factors of China’s Coastal Marsh during 2000–2020 based on Open Datasets

Coastal wetlands face dual threats from climate change and human disturbances, while they provide important ecosystem functions and deliver essential ecosystem services. Exploring the drivers behind coastal wetland changes will benefit sustainable coastal ecosystem management. Based on GlobaLand30 data, this study systematically assessed the spatiotemporal changes and drivers of China’s coastal marsh changes during 2000–2020 by incorporating land-use transformation process and various anthropogenic and environmental factors from public datasets. Our findings revealed a net increase of 865.8 km2 in coastal marsh area during 2000–2020, with distinct regional variations. Coastal marsh changes were more evident north of 30°N, particularly in the Bohai Rim region (37–41°N) and the Yangtze River Delta (30–33°N). Over 75% of major coastal marsh gains (> 1,250 ha) and losses (> 1,000 ha) based on 25 km2 hexagonal grids occurred in these two regions during 2000–2020. The increase in the proportion of major coastal marsh loss grids (> 1,000 km2) from 80.0% to 89.8% in these two regions during 2010–2020 suggests that some areas continued to deteriorate, highlighting that total area changes may mask important local dynamics. While driving factors varied across latitudes, land reclamation remained the dominant reason for coastal wetland loss. Reclamation induced coastal marsh loss accounting for over 60% of the total losses across all sea regions during different periods. In the Bohai Rim, the latitudinal distribution of marsh losses aligned with aquaculture changes patterns, while marsh gains primarily resulted from ecological recovery. In the East China Sea region where the Yangtze Delta is located, accretion contributed over 65% of total gains during both 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 periods. The areas of significant coastal marsh changes in the East China Sea region spatially overlapped with the distribution range of Spartina alterniflora. Based on the analysis of driving forces and ecological issues, this study proposed region-specific adaptive management strategies. Future research should strengthen the quantitative analysis of multiple driving forces’ interactions to provide a scientific basis for developing more targeted land-sea management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信