超越文体类型学:中国西北喇家遗址(公元前2300-1900年)不同陶艺传统和社会互动的考古重建

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Yingjie Luo, Zhanwei Du, Mengzhou Yu, Qianqian Wang, Wei Du, Qiang Zhen, Qian Ma, Haichao Li, Jianfeng Cui
{"title":"超越文体类型学:中国西北喇家遗址(公元前2300-1900年)不同陶艺传统和社会互动的考古重建","authors":"Yingjie Luo,&nbsp;Zhanwei Du,&nbsp;Mengzhou Yu,&nbsp;Qianqian Wang,&nbsp;Wei Du,&nbsp;Qiang Zhen,&nbsp;Qian Ma,&nbsp;Haichao Li,&nbsp;Jianfeng Cui","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Northwest China during the late third to early second millennium BCE served as a cultural crossroads in the rise of the Bronze Age in ancient China. During this time, many settlements in Northwest China exhibited a diverse range of pottery styles, suggesting possible interactions between different communities. Recent excavations at the Lajia site in the He-Huang Region provide new evidence for examining the technological and stylistic connections between the pottery assemblages of different styles. Integrated macroscopic examination, petrographic analysis, and chemical composition analysis reveal that while pottery vessels of various styles at Lajia predominantly used high-calcium clays, there were significant technological differences in raw material processing, forming, surface treatment, and firing techniques. All Qijia-style pottery, along with some Eastern-style pottery, appear to have been locally produced, while Machang-style pottery was likely produced in areas with similar geological conditions and exchanged over short distances. A small number of Eastern-style and Xichengyi-style pottery vessels were likely introduced through long-distance exchange. Despite their limited quantities, these non-local products provide compelling evidence for long-distance exchange networks extending to the Tao River Basin, the Hexi Corridor and further regions during the late third to early second millennium BCE. This study suggests that the Eastern He-Huang Region during the late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age functioned as a cultural hub, where material traditions and technological knowledge from eastern and western spheres converged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond stylistic typology: Archaeometric reconstruction of diverse pottery traditions and intercommunity interactions at the Lajia site (2300–1900 BCE), Northwest China\",\"authors\":\"Yingjie Luo,&nbsp;Zhanwei Du,&nbsp;Mengzhou Yu,&nbsp;Qianqian Wang,&nbsp;Wei Du,&nbsp;Qiang Zhen,&nbsp;Qian Ma,&nbsp;Haichao Li,&nbsp;Jianfeng Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Northwest China during the late third to early second millennium BCE served as a cultural crossroads in the rise of the Bronze Age in ancient China. During this time, many settlements in Northwest China exhibited a diverse range of pottery styles, suggesting possible interactions between different communities. Recent excavations at the Lajia site in the He-Huang Region provide new evidence for examining the technological and stylistic connections between the pottery assemblages of different styles. Integrated macroscopic examination, petrographic analysis, and chemical composition analysis reveal that while pottery vessels of various styles at Lajia predominantly used high-calcium clays, there were significant technological differences in raw material processing, forming, surface treatment, and firing techniques. All Qijia-style pottery, along with some Eastern-style pottery, appear to have been locally produced, while Machang-style pottery was likely produced in areas with similar geological conditions and exchanged over short distances. A small number of Eastern-style and Xichengyi-style pottery vessels were likely introduced through long-distance exchange. Despite their limited quantities, these non-local products provide compelling evidence for long-distance exchange networks extending to the Tao River Basin, the Hexi Corridor and further regions during the late third to early second millennium BCE. This study suggests that the Eastern He-Huang Region during the late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age functioned as a cultural hub, where material traditions and technological knowledge from eastern and western spheres converged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公元前三千年晚期到公元前二千年早期,中国西北地区在古代中国青铜器时代的崛起中扮演了文化十字路口的角色。在此期间,中国西北部的许多聚落展示了各种各样的陶器风格,这表明不同社区之间可能存在相互作用。最近在河黄地区喇家遗址的发掘为研究不同风格的陶器组合之间的技术和风格联系提供了新的证据。综合宏观考察、岩相分析和化学成分分析表明,虽然喇家不同风格的陶器主要使用高钙粘土,但在原料加工、成型、表面处理和烧制技术上存在显著的技术差异。所有齐家风格的陶器,以及一些东方风格的陶器,似乎都是在当地生产的,而马场风格的陶器可能是在地质条件相似的地区生产的,并且是在很短的距离内交换的。少量的东方风格和西城风格的陶器可能是通过长途交流传入的。尽管数量有限,但这些非本地产品提供了令人信服的证据,证明在公元前三千年晚期到公元前二千年早期,长距离交换网络延伸到了陶河流域、河西走廊和更远的地区。该研究表明,新石器时代晚期至青铜时代早期,东河黄地区是东西方物质传统和技术知识交汇的文化中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond stylistic typology: Archaeometric reconstruction of diverse pottery traditions and intercommunity interactions at the Lajia site (2300–1900 BCE), Northwest China

Beyond stylistic typology: Archaeometric reconstruction of diverse pottery traditions and intercommunity interactions at the Lajia site (2300–1900 BCE), Northwest China

The Northwest China during the late third to early second millennium BCE served as a cultural crossroads in the rise of the Bronze Age in ancient China. During this time, many settlements in Northwest China exhibited a diverse range of pottery styles, suggesting possible interactions between different communities. Recent excavations at the Lajia site in the He-Huang Region provide new evidence for examining the technological and stylistic connections between the pottery assemblages of different styles. Integrated macroscopic examination, petrographic analysis, and chemical composition analysis reveal that while pottery vessels of various styles at Lajia predominantly used high-calcium clays, there were significant technological differences in raw material processing, forming, surface treatment, and firing techniques. All Qijia-style pottery, along with some Eastern-style pottery, appear to have been locally produced, while Machang-style pottery was likely produced in areas with similar geological conditions and exchanged over short distances. A small number of Eastern-style and Xichengyi-style pottery vessels were likely introduced through long-distance exchange. Despite their limited quantities, these non-local products provide compelling evidence for long-distance exchange networks extending to the Tao River Basin, the Hexi Corridor and further regions during the late third to early second millennium BCE. This study suggests that the Eastern He-Huang Region during the late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age functioned as a cultural hub, where material traditions and technological knowledge from eastern and western spheres converged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信