Yingjie Luo, Zhanwei Du, Mengzhou Yu, Qianqian Wang, Wei Du, Qiang Zhen, Qian Ma, Haichao Li, Jianfeng Cui
{"title":"超越文体类型学:中国西北喇家遗址(公元前2300-1900年)不同陶艺传统和社会互动的考古重建","authors":"Yingjie Luo, Zhanwei Du, Mengzhou Yu, Qianqian Wang, Wei Du, Qiang Zhen, Qian Ma, Haichao Li, Jianfeng Cui","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Northwest China during the late third to early second millennium BCE served as a cultural crossroads in the rise of the Bronze Age in ancient China. During this time, many settlements in Northwest China exhibited a diverse range of pottery styles, suggesting possible interactions between different communities. Recent excavations at the Lajia site in the He-Huang Region provide new evidence for examining the technological and stylistic connections between the pottery assemblages of different styles. Integrated macroscopic examination, petrographic analysis, and chemical composition analysis reveal that while pottery vessels of various styles at Lajia predominantly used high-calcium clays, there were significant technological differences in raw material processing, forming, surface treatment, and firing techniques. All Qijia-style pottery, along with some Eastern-style pottery, appear to have been locally produced, while Machang-style pottery was likely produced in areas with similar geological conditions and exchanged over short distances. A small number of Eastern-style and Xichengyi-style pottery vessels were likely introduced through long-distance exchange. Despite their limited quantities, these non-local products provide compelling evidence for long-distance exchange networks extending to the Tao River Basin, the Hexi Corridor and further regions during the late third to early second millennium BCE. This study suggests that the Eastern He-Huang Region during the late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age functioned as a cultural hub, where material traditions and technological knowledge from eastern and western spheres converged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond stylistic typology: Archaeometric reconstruction of diverse pottery traditions and intercommunity interactions at the Lajia site (2300–1900 BCE), Northwest China\",\"authors\":\"Yingjie Luo, Zhanwei Du, Mengzhou Yu, Qianqian Wang, Wei Du, Qiang Zhen, Qian Ma, Haichao Li, Jianfeng Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Northwest China during the late third to early second millennium BCE served as a cultural crossroads in the rise of the Bronze Age in ancient China. During this time, many settlements in Northwest China exhibited a diverse range of pottery styles, suggesting possible interactions between different communities. Recent excavations at the Lajia site in the He-Huang Region provide new evidence for examining the technological and stylistic connections between the pottery assemblages of different styles. Integrated macroscopic examination, petrographic analysis, and chemical composition analysis reveal that while pottery vessels of various styles at Lajia predominantly used high-calcium clays, there were significant technological differences in raw material processing, forming, surface treatment, and firing techniques. All Qijia-style pottery, along with some Eastern-style pottery, appear to have been locally produced, while Machang-style pottery was likely produced in areas with similar geological conditions and exchanged over short distances. A small number of Eastern-style and Xichengyi-style pottery vessels were likely introduced through long-distance exchange. Despite their limited quantities, these non-local products provide compelling evidence for long-distance exchange networks extending to the Tao River Basin, the Hexi Corridor and further regions during the late third to early second millennium BCE. This study suggests that the Eastern He-Huang Region during the late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age functioned as a cultural hub, where material traditions and technological knowledge from eastern and western spheres converged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02267-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond stylistic typology: Archaeometric reconstruction of diverse pottery traditions and intercommunity interactions at the Lajia site (2300–1900 BCE), Northwest China
The Northwest China during the late third to early second millennium BCE served as a cultural crossroads in the rise of the Bronze Age in ancient China. During this time, many settlements in Northwest China exhibited a diverse range of pottery styles, suggesting possible interactions between different communities. Recent excavations at the Lajia site in the He-Huang Region provide new evidence for examining the technological and stylistic connections between the pottery assemblages of different styles. Integrated macroscopic examination, petrographic analysis, and chemical composition analysis reveal that while pottery vessels of various styles at Lajia predominantly used high-calcium clays, there were significant technological differences in raw material processing, forming, surface treatment, and firing techniques. All Qijia-style pottery, along with some Eastern-style pottery, appear to have been locally produced, while Machang-style pottery was likely produced in areas with similar geological conditions and exchanged over short distances. A small number of Eastern-style and Xichengyi-style pottery vessels were likely introduced through long-distance exchange. Despite their limited quantities, these non-local products provide compelling evidence for long-distance exchange networks extending to the Tao River Basin, the Hexi Corridor and further regions during the late third to early second millennium BCE. This study suggests that the Eastern He-Huang Region during the late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age functioned as a cultural hub, where material traditions and technological knowledge from eastern and western spheres converged.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research.
Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science.
The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).