双侧连续胸椎旁阻滞与静脉输注芬太尼在胸骨正中切开行心脏手术患者围手术期镇痛的比较

IF 2.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Dina Kassim, Samaa Rashwan, Youssef Youssef, Ihab Omar, Ahmed El-Shaarawy
{"title":"双侧连续胸椎旁阻滞与静脉输注芬太尼在胸骨正中切开行心脏手术患者围手术期镇痛的比较","authors":"Dina Kassim,&nbsp;Samaa Rashwan,&nbsp;Youssef Youssef,&nbsp;Ihab Omar,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Shaarawy","doi":"10.1186/s43088-025-00637-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In patients who are undergoing open cardiac surgery, thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is advantageous for pain management. Our objective was to compare this type of block with intravenous Fentanyl analgesia in those patients.</p><h3>Methodology</h3><p>This prospective, randomized study included 44 patients who underwent open-heart surgery through a median sternotomy. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups (each with 22 subjects). Group I (Fentanyl group) (<i>n</i> = 22): received fentanyl infusion 2 µg/kg/h after placing the endotracheal tube and stopped at the end of surgery. Group II (TPVB group) (<i>n</i> = 22): Bilateral thoracic paravertebral catheters were inserted preoperative. Before induction, there was a maximum of 20 ml per side for each catheter, which received a bolus dose of 0.3 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine. Continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at a rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h was administered through each catheter following intubation. The infusion was subsequently discontinued at the conclusion of the procedure.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) was lower in patients of group II (TPVB group) than in patients of group I (fentanyl group); in group II at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 2,3,3, respectively, whereas median CCPOT in group I at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 3,4,4, respectively (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.05). In comparison with group I, there was a substantial decrease in the intraoperative fentanyl requirements of group II (343.6 µg ± 44.1 and 926.8 µg ± 117.4) (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.05). In comparison with group I (9 mg 2), the TPVB group’s postoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower (6.2 mg 2.3). <i>P</i>-value was less than 0.05.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with IV fentanyl infusion, Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block was determined to be more effective in the operative and postoperative analgesia of patients who underwent heart surgery via median sternotomy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":481,"journal":{"name":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-025-00637-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block versus IV fentanyl infusion for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy\",\"authors\":\"Dina Kassim,&nbsp;Samaa Rashwan,&nbsp;Youssef Youssef,&nbsp;Ihab Omar,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Shaarawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43088-025-00637-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In patients who are undergoing open cardiac surgery, thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is advantageous for pain management. Our objective was to compare this type of block with intravenous Fentanyl analgesia in those patients.</p><h3>Methodology</h3><p>This prospective, randomized study included 44 patients who underwent open-heart surgery through a median sternotomy. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups (each with 22 subjects). Group I (Fentanyl group) (<i>n</i> = 22): received fentanyl infusion 2 µg/kg/h after placing the endotracheal tube and stopped at the end of surgery. Group II (TPVB group) (<i>n</i> = 22): Bilateral thoracic paravertebral catheters were inserted preoperative. Before induction, there was a maximum of 20 ml per side for each catheter, which received a bolus dose of 0.3 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine. Continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at a rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h was administered through each catheter following intubation. The infusion was subsequently discontinued at the conclusion of the procedure.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) was lower in patients of group II (TPVB group) than in patients of group I (fentanyl group); in group II at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 2,3,3, respectively, whereas median CCPOT in group I at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 3,4,4, respectively (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.05). In comparison with group I, there was a substantial decrease in the intraoperative fentanyl requirements of group II (343.6 µg ± 44.1 and 926.8 µg ± 117.4) (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.05). In comparison with group I (9 mg 2), the TPVB group’s postoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower (6.2 mg 2.3). <i>P</i>-value was less than 0.05.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with IV fentanyl infusion, Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block was determined to be more effective in the operative and postoperative analgesia of patients who underwent heart surgery via median sternotomy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-025-00637-7\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-025-00637-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-025-00637-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受心脏直视手术的患者中,胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)有利于疼痛的控制。我们的目的是比较这种类型的阻滞与静脉芬太尼镇痛在这些患者。方法:这项前瞻性、随机研究包括44例通过胸骨正中切开术进行心内直视手术的患者。参与者被随机分为两组(每组22人)。第一组(芬太尼组)(n = 22):置管后给予芬太尼输注2µg/kg/h,手术结束时停止。第二组(TPVB组)(n = 22):术前行双侧胸椎旁置管。诱导前,每根导管每侧最大20ml,注射0.3 ml/kg 0.25%布比卡因。插管后,每根导管以0.1 ml/kg/h的速率持续输注0.25%布比卡因。随后在手术结束时停止输注。结果II组(TPVB组)患者的CCPOT评分低于I组(芬太尼组);II组术后8 h、12 h、24 h中位CCPOT分别为2、3、3,而I组术后8 h、12 h、24 h中位CCPOT分别为3、4、4 (p值<; 0.05)。与I组比较,II组术中芬太尼需用量明显降低(343.6µg±44.1和926.8µg±117.4)(p值<; 0.05)。与I组(9 mg 2)相比,TPVB组术后阿片类药物需求量显著降低(6.2 mg 2.3)。p值小于0.05。结论与静脉输注芬太尼相比,双侧连续胸椎旁阻滞对经胸骨正中切口行心脏手术患者的术中及术后镇痛更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block versus IV fentanyl infusion for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy

Background

In patients who are undergoing open cardiac surgery, thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is advantageous for pain management. Our objective was to compare this type of block with intravenous Fentanyl analgesia in those patients.

Methodology

This prospective, randomized study included 44 patients who underwent open-heart surgery through a median sternotomy. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups (each with 22 subjects). Group I (Fentanyl group) (n = 22): received fentanyl infusion 2 µg/kg/h after placing the endotracheal tube and stopped at the end of surgery. Group II (TPVB group) (n = 22): Bilateral thoracic paravertebral catheters were inserted preoperative. Before induction, there was a maximum of 20 ml per side for each catheter, which received a bolus dose of 0.3 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine. Continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at a rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h was administered through each catheter following intubation. The infusion was subsequently discontinued at the conclusion of the procedure.

Results

Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) was lower in patients of group II (TPVB group) than in patients of group I (fentanyl group); in group II at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 2,3,3, respectively, whereas median CCPOT in group I at 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperative were 3,4,4, respectively (p-value < 0.05). In comparison with group I, there was a substantial decrease in the intraoperative fentanyl requirements of group II (343.6 µg ± 44.1 and 926.8 µg ± 117.4) (p-value < 0.05). In comparison with group I (9 mg 2), the TPVB group’s postoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower (6.2 mg 2.3). P-value was less than 0.05.

Conclusion

Compared with IV fentanyl infusion, Bilateral continuous thoracic paravertebral block was determined to be more effective in the operative and postoperative analgesia of patients who underwent heart surgery via median sternotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (BJBAS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. This journal welcomes submissions of original research, literature reviews, and editorials in its respected fields of fundamental science, applied science (with a particular focus on the fields of applied nanotechnology and biotechnology), medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, and engineering. The multidisciplinary aspects of the journal encourage global collaboration between researchers in multiple fields and provide cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信