{"title":"怀疑论的怀疑，主要依据，启发式和理性规范","authors":"Jonathan Ichikawa","doi":"10.1007/s44204-025-00299-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A critical dicussion of Ángel Pinillos’s (2023) <i>Why We Doubt</i>, focusing on questions about delineating the boundaries of skeptical doubt, the nature of evidence and its connections to sensitivity conditions, specifying principal bases for beliefs, and the connections Pinillos posits between skeptical intuitions and Bayesian norms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeptical doubt, principal bases, and heuristics and rational norms\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Ichikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44204-025-00299-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A critical dicussion of Ángel Pinillos’s (2023) <i>Why We Doubt</i>, focusing on questions about delineating the boundaries of skeptical doubt, the nature of evidence and its connections to sensitivity conditions, specifying principal bases for beliefs, and the connections Pinillos posits between skeptical intuitions and Bayesian norms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00299-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00299-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Skeptical doubt, principal bases, and heuristics and rational norms
A critical dicussion of Ángel Pinillos’s (2023) Why We Doubt, focusing on questions about delineating the boundaries of skeptical doubt, the nature of evidence and its connections to sensitivity conditions, specifying principal bases for beliefs, and the connections Pinillos posits between skeptical intuitions and Bayesian norms.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
