大城市地区快速交通扩张的可持续性:改进决策的差距和解决方案

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Tamara Kondrachova, Eric J. Miller, Giovanni Grasselli
{"title":"大城市地区快速交通扩张的可持续性:改进决策的差距和解决方案","authors":"Tamara Kondrachova,&nbsp;Eric J. Miller,&nbsp;Giovanni Grasselli","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Focusing on sustainability, this paper explores the decision-making process adopted in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for delivery of rapid transit projects. The GTA represents the largest Canadian metropolitan area operating under democratic principles similar to other democracies across the globe. The term “public sector” in this context includes all government levels—municipal, provincial, and federal—and their agencies, which collectively utilize taxpayer funding to deliver essential public services. This study consolidates the evolution and outcomes of a 30-year decision-making process by compiling open-source internet data into two specialized databases. The analysis indicates that, over the last three decades, rapid transit projects have experienced steadily increasing delivery timelines and costs. These trends correlate with a slow expansion of rapid transit networks, averaging only 0.7–1.6 km/year across Canada. Notably, in the GTA, the average project delivery timeline has extended from 7 years to 12 years since the year 2000, while costs have escalated fourfold. Additionally, construction costs for water and wastewater pipelines and tunnels have risen by up to a factor of 20 relative to historical values. In response to these unsustainable trends, this study proposes a novel decision-making framework to evaluate the sustainability of rapid transit alternatives. The framework addresses the absence of comprehensive project planning tools that compare horizontal routes, vertical alignments, and feasible construction methods. By offering a systematic approach to select the most sustainable rapid transit solutions, this framework is particularly beneficial for large metropolitan areas experiencing rapid urbanization and a pressing need for long-term sustainable infrastructure. Furthermore, its adoption modernizes an outdated decision-making paradigm rooted in the 20th century, advancing toward a more sustainable, integrated approach for each public sector decision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107083"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of rapid-transit expansion in large metropolitan areas: Gaps and solutions for decision-making improvement\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Kondrachova,&nbsp;Eric J. Miller,&nbsp;Giovanni Grasselli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Focusing on sustainability, this paper explores the decision-making process adopted in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for delivery of rapid transit projects. The GTA represents the largest Canadian metropolitan area operating under democratic principles similar to other democracies across the globe. The term “public sector” in this context includes all government levels—municipal, provincial, and federal—and their agencies, which collectively utilize taxpayer funding to deliver essential public services. This study consolidates the evolution and outcomes of a 30-year decision-making process by compiling open-source internet data into two specialized databases. The analysis indicates that, over the last three decades, rapid transit projects have experienced steadily increasing delivery timelines and costs. These trends correlate with a slow expansion of rapid transit networks, averaging only 0.7–1.6 km/year across Canada. Notably, in the GTA, the average project delivery timeline has extended from 7 years to 12 years since the year 2000, while costs have escalated fourfold. Additionally, construction costs for water and wastewater pipelines and tunnels have risen by up to a factor of 20 relative to historical values. In response to these unsustainable trends, this study proposes a novel decision-making framework to evaluate the sustainability of rapid transit alternatives. The framework addresses the absence of comprehensive project planning tools that compare horizontal routes, vertical alignments, and feasible construction methods. By offering a systematic approach to select the most sustainable rapid transit solutions, this framework is particularly beneficial for large metropolitan areas experiencing rapid urbanization and a pressing need for long-term sustainable infrastructure. Furthermore, its adoption modernizes an outdated decision-making paradigm rooted in the 20th century, advancing toward a more sustainable, integrated approach for each public sector decision.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007217\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以可持续发展为重点,探讨了大多伦多地区(GTA)快速交通项目的决策过程。大多伦多地区是加拿大最大的都市区,在类似于全球其他民主国家的民主原则下运作。这里的“公共部门”包括市级、省级和联邦各级政府及其机构,它们共同利用纳税人的资金提供基本的公共服务。本研究通过将开源互联网数据汇编到两个专门的数据库中,整合了30年决策过程的演变和结果。分析表明,在过去三十年中,快速运输项目的交付时间和成本稳步增加。这些趋势与快速交通网络的缓慢扩张有关,在加拿大平均每年只有0.7-1.6公里。值得注意的是,在大多伦多地区,自2000年以来,平均项目交付时间从7年延长到12年,而成本则增加了4倍。此外,供水和污水管道和隧道的建设成本相对于历史价值上涨了20倍。为了应对这些不可持续的趋势,本研究提出了一个新的决策框架来评估快速交通替代方案的可持续性。该框架解决了缺乏综合项目规划工具来比较水平路线、垂直路线和可行的施工方法的问题。通过提供一种系统的方法来选择最可持续的快速交通解决方案,该框架特别有利于经历快速城市化和迫切需要长期可持续基础设施的大城市地区。此外,它的采用使植根于20世纪的过时决策范式现代化,朝着更可持续、更综合的公共部门决策方法迈进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability of rapid-transit expansion in large metropolitan areas: Gaps and solutions for decision-making improvement
Focusing on sustainability, this paper explores the decision-making process adopted in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for delivery of rapid transit projects. The GTA represents the largest Canadian metropolitan area operating under democratic principles similar to other democracies across the globe. The term “public sector” in this context includes all government levels—municipal, provincial, and federal—and their agencies, which collectively utilize taxpayer funding to deliver essential public services. This study consolidates the evolution and outcomes of a 30-year decision-making process by compiling open-source internet data into two specialized databases. The analysis indicates that, over the last three decades, rapid transit projects have experienced steadily increasing delivery timelines and costs. These trends correlate with a slow expansion of rapid transit networks, averaging only 0.7–1.6 km/year across Canada. Notably, in the GTA, the average project delivery timeline has extended from 7 years to 12 years since the year 2000, while costs have escalated fourfold. Additionally, construction costs for water and wastewater pipelines and tunnels have risen by up to a factor of 20 relative to historical values. In response to these unsustainable trends, this study proposes a novel decision-making framework to evaluate the sustainability of rapid transit alternatives. The framework addresses the absence of comprehensive project planning tools that compare horizontal routes, vertical alignments, and feasible construction methods. By offering a systematic approach to select the most sustainable rapid transit solutions, this framework is particularly beneficial for large metropolitan areas experiencing rapid urbanization and a pressing need for long-term sustainable infrastructure. Furthermore, its adoption modernizes an outdated decision-making paradigm rooted in the 20th century, advancing toward a more sustainable, integrated approach for each public sector decision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信