Tamara Kondrachova, Eric J. Miller, Giovanni Grasselli
{"title":"大城市地区快速交通扩张的可持续性:改进决策的差距和解决方案","authors":"Tamara Kondrachova, Eric J. Miller, Giovanni Grasselli","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Focusing on sustainability, this paper explores the decision-making process adopted in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for delivery of rapid transit projects. The GTA represents the largest Canadian metropolitan area operating under democratic principles similar to other democracies across the globe. The term “public sector” in this context includes all government levels—municipal, provincial, and federal—and their agencies, which collectively utilize taxpayer funding to deliver essential public services. This study consolidates the evolution and outcomes of a 30-year decision-making process by compiling open-source internet data into two specialized databases. The analysis indicates that, over the last three decades, rapid transit projects have experienced steadily increasing delivery timelines and costs. These trends correlate with a slow expansion of rapid transit networks, averaging only 0.7–1.6 km/year across Canada. Notably, in the GTA, the average project delivery timeline has extended from 7 years to 12 years since the year 2000, while costs have escalated fourfold. Additionally, construction costs for water and wastewater pipelines and tunnels have risen by up to a factor of 20 relative to historical values. In response to these unsustainable trends, this study proposes a novel decision-making framework to evaluate the sustainability of rapid transit alternatives. The framework addresses the absence of comprehensive project planning tools that compare horizontal routes, vertical alignments, and feasible construction methods. By offering a systematic approach to select the most sustainable rapid transit solutions, this framework is particularly beneficial for large metropolitan areas experiencing rapid urbanization and a pressing need for long-term sustainable infrastructure. Furthermore, its adoption modernizes an outdated decision-making paradigm rooted in the 20th century, advancing toward a more sustainable, integrated approach for each public sector decision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107083"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of rapid-transit expansion in large metropolitan areas: Gaps and solutions for decision-making improvement\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Kondrachova, Eric J. Miller, Giovanni Grasselli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Focusing on sustainability, this paper explores the decision-making process adopted in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for delivery of rapid transit projects. The GTA represents the largest Canadian metropolitan area operating under democratic principles similar to other democracies across the globe. The term “public sector” in this context includes all government levels—municipal, provincial, and federal—and their agencies, which collectively utilize taxpayer funding to deliver essential public services. This study consolidates the evolution and outcomes of a 30-year decision-making process by compiling open-source internet data into two specialized databases. The analysis indicates that, over the last three decades, rapid transit projects have experienced steadily increasing delivery timelines and costs. These trends correlate with a slow expansion of rapid transit networks, averaging only 0.7–1.6 km/year across Canada. Notably, in the GTA, the average project delivery timeline has extended from 7 years to 12 years since the year 2000, while costs have escalated fourfold. Additionally, construction costs for water and wastewater pipelines and tunnels have risen by up to a factor of 20 relative to historical values. In response to these unsustainable trends, this study proposes a novel decision-making framework to evaluate the sustainability of rapid transit alternatives. The framework addresses the absence of comprehensive project planning tools that compare horizontal routes, vertical alignments, and feasible construction methods. By offering a systematic approach to select the most sustainable rapid transit solutions, this framework is particularly beneficial for large metropolitan areas experiencing rapid urbanization and a pressing need for long-term sustainable infrastructure. Furthermore, its adoption modernizes an outdated decision-making paradigm rooted in the 20th century, advancing toward a more sustainable, integrated approach for each public sector decision.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007217\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sustainability of rapid-transit expansion in large metropolitan areas: Gaps and solutions for decision-making improvement
Focusing on sustainability, this paper explores the decision-making process adopted in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) for delivery of rapid transit projects. The GTA represents the largest Canadian metropolitan area operating under democratic principles similar to other democracies across the globe. The term “public sector” in this context includes all government levels—municipal, provincial, and federal—and their agencies, which collectively utilize taxpayer funding to deliver essential public services. This study consolidates the evolution and outcomes of a 30-year decision-making process by compiling open-source internet data into two specialized databases. The analysis indicates that, over the last three decades, rapid transit projects have experienced steadily increasing delivery timelines and costs. These trends correlate with a slow expansion of rapid transit networks, averaging only 0.7–1.6 km/year across Canada. Notably, in the GTA, the average project delivery timeline has extended from 7 years to 12 years since the year 2000, while costs have escalated fourfold. Additionally, construction costs for water and wastewater pipelines and tunnels have risen by up to a factor of 20 relative to historical values. In response to these unsustainable trends, this study proposes a novel decision-making framework to evaluate the sustainability of rapid transit alternatives. The framework addresses the absence of comprehensive project planning tools that compare horizontal routes, vertical alignments, and feasible construction methods. By offering a systematic approach to select the most sustainable rapid transit solutions, this framework is particularly beneficial for large metropolitan areas experiencing rapid urbanization and a pressing need for long-term sustainable infrastructure. Furthermore, its adoption modernizes an outdated decision-making paradigm rooted in the 20th century, advancing toward a more sustainable, integrated approach for each public sector decision.
期刊介绍:
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.