Nicole Tan , Yiyun Shou , Junwen Chen , Bruce K. Christensen
{"title":"状态焦虑对社交焦虑中跳脱结论偏见的影响:一项实验和计算模型研究","authors":"Nicole Tan , Yiyun Shou , Junwen Chen , Bruce K. Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research indicates that the tendency to make hasty decisions based on minimal information, also known as the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias, may be linked to social anxiety and could be exacerbated under high state anxiety, but this relationship is inconclusive due to a lack of consistent findings. The present study applied a Bayesian computational modelling approach alongside frequentist hypothesis testing to investigate the relationships between trait and state social anxiety and the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias across various beads tasks. An online experimental study involving 131 participants experiencing subclinical social anxiety revealed that higher trait social anxiety significantly attenuated one's belief updating in neutral situations when exposed to a state social anxiety induction. Conversely, higher trait social anxiety significantly increased belief updating about one's social performance, but this depended on the state social anxiety induction. No significant associations were found between trait and state social anxiety and observed dependent variables measured in the beads tasks. The implications are explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 104859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of state anxiety on jumping-to-conclusions bias in social anxiety: An experimental and computational modelling study\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Tan , Yiyun Shou , Junwen Chen , Bruce K. Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research indicates that the tendency to make hasty decisions based on minimal information, also known as the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias, may be linked to social anxiety and could be exacerbated under high state anxiety, but this relationship is inconclusive due to a lack of consistent findings. The present study applied a Bayesian computational modelling approach alongside frequentist hypothesis testing to investigate the relationships between trait and state social anxiety and the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias across various beads tasks. An online experimental study involving 131 participants experiencing subclinical social anxiety revealed that higher trait social anxiety significantly attenuated one's belief updating in neutral situations when exposed to a state social anxiety induction. Conversely, higher trait social anxiety significantly increased belief updating about one's social performance, but this depended on the state social anxiety induction. No significant associations were found between trait and state social anxiety and observed dependent variables measured in the beads tasks. The implications are explored.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001810\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of state anxiety on jumping-to-conclusions bias in social anxiety: An experimental and computational modelling study
Research indicates that the tendency to make hasty decisions based on minimal information, also known as the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias, may be linked to social anxiety and could be exacerbated under high state anxiety, but this relationship is inconclusive due to a lack of consistent findings. The present study applied a Bayesian computational modelling approach alongside frequentist hypothesis testing to investigate the relationships between trait and state social anxiety and the Jumping-to-Conclusions bias across various beads tasks. An online experimental study involving 131 participants experiencing subclinical social anxiety revealed that higher trait social anxiety significantly attenuated one's belief updating in neutral situations when exposed to a state social anxiety induction. Conversely, higher trait social anxiety significantly increased belief updating about one's social performance, but this depended on the state social anxiety induction. No significant associations were found between trait and state social anxiety and observed dependent variables measured in the beads tasks. The implications are explored.
期刊介绍:
The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.