倡导行动:认可整个学术界的体验式教育教育者

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sara N. Trovinger , Andrea Murzello , Jessica Lendoiro , Keith DelMonte , Samantha Champion
{"title":"倡导行动:认可整个学术界的体验式教育教育者","authors":"Sara N. Trovinger ,&nbsp;Andrea Murzello ,&nbsp;Jessica Lendoiro ,&nbsp;Keith DelMonte ,&nbsp;Samantha Champion","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The 2024 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Profile of Pharmacy Faculty survey highlights potential rank disparities for directors and coordinators of experiential education (EE) compared to traditional faculty.(American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, 2024<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span><sup>)</sup> Challenges stem from promotion guidelines favoring research and teaching, despite the critical contributions of EE professionals, which deserve equal recognition in academic pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>The Doctor of Pharmacy's experiential education expansion has increased faculty roles for EE directors and coordinators, yet promotion disparities persist. EE directors face challenges due to administrative duties, traditional metrics favoring research, and undervalued teaching roles.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Institutions should revise promotion guidelines, if appropriate, to include non-traditional faculty roles. Education sessions aimed at stakeholders outside of the specialty would bring awareness to the issue and offer actionable solutions that would benefit all members of the pharmacy education community. Involving EE professionals ensures parity, celebrates faculty strengths, and promotes diverse contributions to enrich and advance the academic and professional community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 102486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advocating for action: Recognizing experiential education educators across academia\",\"authors\":\"Sara N. Trovinger ,&nbsp;Andrea Murzello ,&nbsp;Jessica Lendoiro ,&nbsp;Keith DelMonte ,&nbsp;Samantha Champion\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The 2024 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Profile of Pharmacy Faculty survey highlights potential rank disparities for directors and coordinators of experiential education (EE) compared to traditional faculty.(American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, 2024<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span><sup>)</sup> Challenges stem from promotion guidelines favoring research and teaching, despite the critical contributions of EE professionals, which deserve equal recognition in academic pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>The Doctor of Pharmacy's experiential education expansion has increased faculty roles for EE directors and coordinators, yet promotion disparities persist. EE directors face challenges due to administrative duties, traditional metrics favoring research, and undervalued teaching roles.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Institutions should revise promotion guidelines, if appropriate, to include non-traditional faculty roles. Education sessions aimed at stakeholders outside of the specialty would bring awareness to the issue and offer actionable solutions that would benefit all members of the pharmacy education community. Involving EE professionals ensures parity, celebrates faculty strengths, and promotes diverse contributions to enrich and advance the academic and professional community.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725002072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725002072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2024年美国药学院协会(AACP)药学院概况调查强调了与传统教师相比,体验式教育(EE)主任和协调员的潜在排名差异。(American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, 20241)尽管情感表达专业人士做出了重要贡献,但挑战来自于倾向于研究和教学的晋升指导方针,他们在学术药学领域应该得到同等的认可。视角药学博士的体验式教育扩展增加了EE主任和协调员的教师角色,但晋升差距仍然存在。由于行政职责、传统的研究指标和被低估的教学角色,EE主任面临着挑战。院校应酌情修订晋升指引,纳入非传统的教师角色。针对专业以外的利益相关者的教育会议将使人们意识到这个问题,并提供可操作的解决方案,这将使药学教育界的所有成员受益。参与EE专业人员确保了平等,颂扬了教师的优势,并促进了多样化的贡献,以丰富和推进学术和专业社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advocating for action: Recognizing experiential education educators across academia

Introduction

The 2024 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Profile of Pharmacy Faculty survey highlights potential rank disparities for directors and coordinators of experiential education (EE) compared to traditional faculty.(American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, 20241) Challenges stem from promotion guidelines favoring research and teaching, despite the critical contributions of EE professionals, which deserve equal recognition in academic pharmacy.

Perspective

The Doctor of Pharmacy's experiential education expansion has increased faculty roles for EE directors and coordinators, yet promotion disparities persist. EE directors face challenges due to administrative duties, traditional metrics favoring research, and undervalued teaching roles.

Implications

Institutions should revise promotion guidelines, if appropriate, to include non-traditional faculty roles. Education sessions aimed at stakeholders outside of the specialty would bring awareness to the issue and offer actionable solutions that would benefit all members of the pharmacy education community. Involving EE professionals ensures parity, celebrates faculty strengths, and promotes diverse contributions to enrich and advance the academic and professional community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信