Diwakar Y. Dube , Mathy Vandhana Sannasi , Markos Kyritsis , Stephen R. Gulliver
{"title":"基于特征损失媒介的面部情感识别:人类与机器学习算法","authors":"Diwakar Y. Dube , Mathy Vandhana Sannasi , Markos Kyritsis , Stephen R. Gulliver","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The automatic identification of human emotion, from low-resolution cameras is important for remote monitoring, interactive software, pro-active marketing, and dynamic customer experience management. Even though facial identification and emotion classification are active fields of research, no studies, to the best of our knowledge, have compared the performance of humans and Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) when classifying facial emotions from media suffering from systematic feature loss. In this study, we used singular value decomposition to systematically reduce the number of features contained within facial emotion images. Human participants were then asked to identify the facial emotion contained within the onscreen images, where image granularity was varied in a stepwise manner (from low to high). By clicking a button, participants added feature vectors until they were confident that they could categorise the emotion. The results of the human performance trials were compared against those of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which classified facial emotions from the same media images. Findings showed that human participants were able to cope with significantly greater levels of granularity, achieving 85 % accuracy with only three singular image vectors. Humans were also more rapid when classifying happy faces. CNNs are as accurate as humans when given mid- and high-resolution images; with 80 % accuracy at twelve singular image vectors or above. The authors believe that this comparison concerning the differences and limitations of human and MLAs is critical to (i) the effective use of CNN with lower-resolution video, and (ii) the development of useable facial recognition heuristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 108806"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facial emotion recognition from feature loss media: Human versus machine learning algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Diwakar Y. Dube , Mathy Vandhana Sannasi , Markos Kyritsis , Stephen R. Gulliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The automatic identification of human emotion, from low-resolution cameras is important for remote monitoring, interactive software, pro-active marketing, and dynamic customer experience management. Even though facial identification and emotion classification are active fields of research, no studies, to the best of our knowledge, have compared the performance of humans and Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) when classifying facial emotions from media suffering from systematic feature loss. In this study, we used singular value decomposition to systematically reduce the number of features contained within facial emotion images. Human participants were then asked to identify the facial emotion contained within the onscreen images, where image granularity was varied in a stepwise manner (from low to high). By clicking a button, participants added feature vectors until they were confident that they could categorise the emotion. The results of the human performance trials were compared against those of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which classified facial emotions from the same media images. Findings showed that human participants were able to cope with significantly greater levels of granularity, achieving 85 % accuracy with only three singular image vectors. Humans were also more rapid when classifying happy faces. CNNs are as accurate as humans when given mid- and high-resolution images; with 80 % accuracy at twelve singular image vectors or above. The authors believe that this comparison concerning the differences and limitations of human and MLAs is critical to (i) the effective use of CNN with lower-resolution video, and (ii) the development of useable facial recognition heuristics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002535\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Facial emotion recognition from feature loss media: Human versus machine learning algorithms
The automatic identification of human emotion, from low-resolution cameras is important for remote monitoring, interactive software, pro-active marketing, and dynamic customer experience management. Even though facial identification and emotion classification are active fields of research, no studies, to the best of our knowledge, have compared the performance of humans and Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) when classifying facial emotions from media suffering from systematic feature loss. In this study, we used singular value decomposition to systematically reduce the number of features contained within facial emotion images. Human participants were then asked to identify the facial emotion contained within the onscreen images, where image granularity was varied in a stepwise manner (from low to high). By clicking a button, participants added feature vectors until they were confident that they could categorise the emotion. The results of the human performance trials were compared against those of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which classified facial emotions from the same media images. Findings showed that human participants were able to cope with significantly greater levels of granularity, achieving 85 % accuracy with only three singular image vectors. Humans were also more rapid when classifying happy faces. CNNs are as accurate as humans when given mid- and high-resolution images; with 80 % accuracy at twelve singular image vectors or above. The authors believe that this comparison concerning the differences and limitations of human and MLAs is critical to (i) the effective use of CNN with lower-resolution video, and (ii) the development of useable facial recognition heuristics.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.