Youmna Ahmed Abdelaal , Heba Talal Saeed , Malak Ahmad Elayyan , Sara Mahmoud Bkairat , Saif Youssef Dib
{"title":"大蒜提取物(Allium sativum)与氯己定漱口水的临床抗菌效果比较:系统综述","authors":"Youmna Ahmed Abdelaal , Heba Talal Saeed , Malak Ahmad Elayyan , Sara Mahmoud Bkairat , Saif Youssef Dib","doi":"10.1016/j.hermed.2025.101053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chlorhexidine is widely used as a gold standard mouthwash but is associated with side effects and concerns over antimicrobial resistance. Garlic (<em>Allium sativum</em>), known for natural antimicrobial properties, has emerged as a potential alternative, though clinical evidence remains limited. This systematic review compares the antimicrobial efficacy of garlic extract with chlorhexidine in clinical practice, assessing its viability as a herbal substitute.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines and utilized the PICO framework to establish the research question. A total of 389 articles were identified from six electronic databases in January 2024, and an additional 13 articles were included through manual citation searching. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, only five articles were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Studies, including randomized controlled trials and clinical studies, showed variable characteristics and low-to-moderate risks of bias. Garlic extract mouthwash showed comparable efficacy to chlorhexidine, particularly at higher concentrations. The effectiveness varied based on mouthwash concentration and duration of application, contributing to differences in outcomes. Some studies favored chlorhexidine for maintaining higher plaque/salivary pH, while others reported garlic extract to be more effective at certain concentrations. However, garlic mouthwash may cause greater discomfort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Garlic extract can serve as a viable alternative to chlorhexidine, especially at higher concentrations. However, side effects such as burning sensation and unpleasant taste may affect patient adherence. Further clinical studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and improve clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herbal Medicine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101053"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Antimicrobial Efficacy of Garlic Extract (Allium sativum) Compared to Chlorhexidine Mouthwash: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Youmna Ahmed Abdelaal , Heba Talal Saeed , Malak Ahmad Elayyan , Sara Mahmoud Bkairat , Saif Youssef Dib\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hermed.2025.101053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chlorhexidine is widely used as a gold standard mouthwash but is associated with side effects and concerns over antimicrobial resistance. Garlic (<em>Allium sativum</em>), known for natural antimicrobial properties, has emerged as a potential alternative, though clinical evidence remains limited. This systematic review compares the antimicrobial efficacy of garlic extract with chlorhexidine in clinical practice, assessing its viability as a herbal substitute.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines and utilized the PICO framework to establish the research question. A total of 389 articles were identified from six electronic databases in January 2024, and an additional 13 articles were included through manual citation searching. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, only five articles were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Studies, including randomized controlled trials and clinical studies, showed variable characteristics and low-to-moderate risks of bias. Garlic extract mouthwash showed comparable efficacy to chlorhexidine, particularly at higher concentrations. The effectiveness varied based on mouthwash concentration and duration of application, contributing to differences in outcomes. Some studies favored chlorhexidine for maintaining higher plaque/salivary pH, while others reported garlic extract to be more effective at certain concentrations. However, garlic mouthwash may cause greater discomfort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Garlic extract can serve as a viable alternative to chlorhexidine, especially at higher concentrations. However, side effects such as burning sensation and unpleasant taste may affect patient adherence. Further clinical studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and improve clinical applicability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Herbal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Herbal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803325000648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herbal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210803325000648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Clinical Antimicrobial Efficacy of Garlic Extract (Allium sativum) Compared to Chlorhexidine Mouthwash: A Systematic Review
Introduction
Chlorhexidine is widely used as a gold standard mouthwash but is associated with side effects and concerns over antimicrobial resistance. Garlic (Allium sativum), known for natural antimicrobial properties, has emerged as a potential alternative, though clinical evidence remains limited. This systematic review compares the antimicrobial efficacy of garlic extract with chlorhexidine in clinical practice, assessing its viability as a herbal substitute.
Methods
The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines and utilized the PICO framework to establish the research question. A total of 389 articles were identified from six electronic databases in January 2024, and an additional 13 articles were included through manual citation searching. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, only five articles were included.
Results
Studies, including randomized controlled trials and clinical studies, showed variable characteristics and low-to-moderate risks of bias. Garlic extract mouthwash showed comparable efficacy to chlorhexidine, particularly at higher concentrations. The effectiveness varied based on mouthwash concentration and duration of application, contributing to differences in outcomes. Some studies favored chlorhexidine for maintaining higher plaque/salivary pH, while others reported garlic extract to be more effective at certain concentrations. However, garlic mouthwash may cause greater discomfort.
Conclusions
Garlic extract can serve as a viable alternative to chlorhexidine, especially at higher concentrations. However, side effects such as burning sensation and unpleasant taste may affect patient adherence. Further clinical studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and improve clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Herbal Medicine, the official journal of the National Institute of Medical Herbalists, is a peer reviewed journal which aims to serve its readers as an authoritative resource on the profession and practice of herbal medicine. The content areas of the journal reflect the interests of Medical Herbalists and other health professionals interested in the clinical and professional application of botanical medicines. The objective is to strengthen the research and educational base of herbal medicine with research papers in the form of case studies, original research articles and reviews, monographs, clinical trials and relevant in vitro studies. It also publishes policy statements, opinion pieces, book reviews, conference proceedings and profession related information such as pharmacovigilance reports providing an information source for not only the Herbal Practitioner but any Health professional with an interest in phytotherapy.