Shi Xue , Zhou Fang , Carena van Riper , Yang Bai , Wei He , Ting Wang , Qin Zhou , Changgao Cheng , Zhongde Huang
{"title":"追踪生态和经济效益的空间变化,以支持城市扩张期间的基本福利维度","authors":"Shi Xue , Zhou Fang , Carena van Riper , Yang Bai , Wei He , Ting Wang , Qin Zhou , Changgao Cheng , Zhongde Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities exist to support the multidimensional wellbeing of their residents. However, urban expansion has been accompanied by a rapid increase in economic benefits (EBs) and a decline in ecosystem services (ESs), both of which are essential for achieving multidimensional human wellbeing. Most existing studies have focused on regional-level changes in EBs and ESs due to the lack of reliable methods for spatially mapping the distribution of EBs. However, human activities and wellbeing are highly localized, shaped by fine-level environmental features and land use patterns. We propose a framework to trace spatial variations in EBs and ESs across analytical levels during urban development, aiming to identify win-win opportunities and support informed spatial planning. In Ordos, China, we found that EBs and ESs generally increased at the regional level, except for water purification. However, at the district level, a pronounced spatial imbalance emerged. In the eastern districts, urban expansion coincided with improvements in all EBs but reduced carbon storage and water purification. In contrast, the western districts showed ecological recovery despite substantial declines in economic supply capacity from 2010 to 2020. Grid-level analysis further revealed specific locations of trade-offs and synergies. Trade-offs were widely distributed across Ordos, particularly concentrated in parts of the east, while synergies were limited to small, clustered areas in the west. We suggest that future urban green infrastructure restoration and multi-functional community construction be prioritized in Ordos’ eastern districts, whereas natural vegetation replantation should take place in western ecologically fragile districts. Overall, our framework has the potential to guide sustainable urban development and reform within China and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 106846"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing spatial variations in ecological and economic benefits to support basic dimensions of wellbeing during urban expansion\",\"authors\":\"Shi Xue , Zhou Fang , Carena van Riper , Yang Bai , Wei He , Ting Wang , Qin Zhou , Changgao Cheng , Zhongde Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cities exist to support the multidimensional wellbeing of their residents. However, urban expansion has been accompanied by a rapid increase in economic benefits (EBs) and a decline in ecosystem services (ESs), both of which are essential for achieving multidimensional human wellbeing. Most existing studies have focused on regional-level changes in EBs and ESs due to the lack of reliable methods for spatially mapping the distribution of EBs. However, human activities and wellbeing are highly localized, shaped by fine-level environmental features and land use patterns. We propose a framework to trace spatial variations in EBs and ESs across analytical levels during urban development, aiming to identify win-win opportunities and support informed spatial planning. In Ordos, China, we found that EBs and ESs generally increased at the regional level, except for water purification. However, at the district level, a pronounced spatial imbalance emerged. In the eastern districts, urban expansion coincided with improvements in all EBs but reduced carbon storage and water purification. In contrast, the western districts showed ecological recovery despite substantial declines in economic supply capacity from 2010 to 2020. Grid-level analysis further revealed specific locations of trade-offs and synergies. Trade-offs were widely distributed across Ordos, particularly concentrated in parts of the east, while synergies were limited to small, clustered areas in the west. We suggest that future urban green infrastructure restoration and multi-functional community construction be prioritized in Ordos’ eastern districts, whereas natural vegetation replantation should take place in western ecologically fragile districts. Overall, our framework has the potential to guide sustainable urban development and reform within China and beyond.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221067072500719X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221067072500719X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tracing spatial variations in ecological and economic benefits to support basic dimensions of wellbeing during urban expansion
Cities exist to support the multidimensional wellbeing of their residents. However, urban expansion has been accompanied by a rapid increase in economic benefits (EBs) and a decline in ecosystem services (ESs), both of which are essential for achieving multidimensional human wellbeing. Most existing studies have focused on regional-level changes in EBs and ESs due to the lack of reliable methods for spatially mapping the distribution of EBs. However, human activities and wellbeing are highly localized, shaped by fine-level environmental features and land use patterns. We propose a framework to trace spatial variations in EBs and ESs across analytical levels during urban development, aiming to identify win-win opportunities and support informed spatial planning. In Ordos, China, we found that EBs and ESs generally increased at the regional level, except for water purification. However, at the district level, a pronounced spatial imbalance emerged. In the eastern districts, urban expansion coincided with improvements in all EBs but reduced carbon storage and water purification. In contrast, the western districts showed ecological recovery despite substantial declines in economic supply capacity from 2010 to 2020. Grid-level analysis further revealed specific locations of trade-offs and synergies. Trade-offs were widely distributed across Ordos, particularly concentrated in parts of the east, while synergies were limited to small, clustered areas in the west. We suggest that future urban green infrastructure restoration and multi-functional community construction be prioritized in Ordos’ eastern districts, whereas natural vegetation replantation should take place in western ecologically fragile districts. Overall, our framework has the potential to guide sustainable urban development and reform within China and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including:
1. Smart cities and resilient environments;
2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management;
3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management);
4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities;
5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments;
6. Green infrastructure and BMPs;
7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management;
8. Urban agriculture and forestry;
9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure;
10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy;
11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities;
12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities;
13. Health monitoring and improvement;
14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies;
15. Smart city governance;
16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society;
17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies;
18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems.
19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management;
20. Waste reduction and recycling;
21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling;
22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;