用于控制猪繁殖的可注射或不可注射的GnRH类似物。系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q3 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Ahm Musleh Uddin , Gebremeskel Mamu Werid , Thien D. Van , Yunmei Song , Sanjay Garg , Roy N. Kirkwood , Kiro R. Petrovski
{"title":"用于控制猪繁殖的可注射或不可注射的GnRH类似物。系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Ahm Musleh Uddin ,&nbsp;Gebremeskel Mamu Werid ,&nbsp;Thien D. Van ,&nbsp;Yunmei Song ,&nbsp;Sanjay Garg ,&nbsp;Roy N. Kirkwood ,&nbsp;Kiro R. Petrovski","doi":"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are widely applied in swine production to synchronise ovulation and so facilitate fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Both injectable and non-injectable formulations are available; however, their comparative effects on reproductive performance remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, evaluated the impact of GnRH analogues on conception rate (CR), farrowing rate (FR), weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI), piglets born per litter (PBL), and piglets born alive (PBAL). Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and subgroup analyses compared injectable versus non-injectable regimens. The effect of a subgroup was analysed by administration route, insemination protocol, frequency, or AI method. Across the 27 included studies, GnRH analogue administration did not improve CR (MD = −0.00, 95 % CI: −0.05 to 0.05) or FR (MD = −0.02, 95 % CI: −0.06 to 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences between injectable and non-injectable routes for any outcome, and heterogeneity remained low (I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). A modest reduction in total PBL (MD = −0.33, 95 % CI –0.57 to −0.08) was evident without effect of subgroup. Although PBAL were slightly reduced (MD = −0.52, 95 % CI –0.82 to −0.22), particularly in subgroups by insemination protocol and insemination frequency there is no biological explanation for this finding. These findings suggest that while GnRH analogues are effective for synchronising ovulation, their influence on litter size is biologically modest. Importantly, non-injectable formulations demonstrated comparable outcomes to injectable approaches, supporting their potential as practical, less-invasive alternatives in commercial settings. To enable robust and parity-specific recommendations, further research should comprise adequately powered, parity-stratified randomised trials in gilts and primiparous (P1) sows. The effects of conventional and post-cervical routes on single FTAI should be assessed. Administration of standardised GnRH analogue dose and timing should be carried out to verify ovulation, control sperm numbers, and pre-specify outcomes (CR, FR, WEI, PBL, and PBAL).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23131,"journal":{"name":"Theriogenology","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 117681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injectable or non-injectable GnRH analogues for control of swine reproduction. A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ahm Musleh Uddin ,&nbsp;Gebremeskel Mamu Werid ,&nbsp;Thien D. Van ,&nbsp;Yunmei Song ,&nbsp;Sanjay Garg ,&nbsp;Roy N. Kirkwood ,&nbsp;Kiro R. Petrovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are widely applied in swine production to synchronise ovulation and so facilitate fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Both injectable and non-injectable formulations are available; however, their comparative effects on reproductive performance remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, evaluated the impact of GnRH analogues on conception rate (CR), farrowing rate (FR), weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI), piglets born per litter (PBL), and piglets born alive (PBAL). Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and subgroup analyses compared injectable versus non-injectable regimens. The effect of a subgroup was analysed by administration route, insemination protocol, frequency, or AI method. Across the 27 included studies, GnRH analogue administration did not improve CR (MD = −0.00, 95 % CI: −0.05 to 0.05) or FR (MD = −0.02, 95 % CI: −0.06 to 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences between injectable and non-injectable routes for any outcome, and heterogeneity remained low (I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). A modest reduction in total PBL (MD = −0.33, 95 % CI –0.57 to −0.08) was evident without effect of subgroup. Although PBAL were slightly reduced (MD = −0.52, 95 % CI –0.82 to −0.22), particularly in subgroups by insemination protocol and insemination frequency there is no biological explanation for this finding. These findings suggest that while GnRH analogues are effective for synchronising ovulation, their influence on litter size is biologically modest. Importantly, non-injectable formulations demonstrated comparable outcomes to injectable approaches, supporting their potential as practical, less-invasive alternatives in commercial settings. To enable robust and parity-specific recommendations, further research should comprise adequately powered, parity-stratified randomised trials in gilts and primiparous (P1) sows. The effects of conventional and post-cervical routes on single FTAI should be assessed. Administration of standardised GnRH analogue dose and timing should be carried out to verify ovulation, control sperm numbers, and pre-specify outcomes (CR, FR, WEI, PBL, and PBAL).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theriogenology\",\"volume\":\"250 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theriogenology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X25004078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theriogenology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X25004078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)类似物被广泛应用于猪生产中,以同步排卵,从而促进固定时间人工授精(FTAI)。可注射和非注射制剂;然而,它们对生殖性能的比较影响尚不清楚。根据PRISMA指南进行的这项系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了GnRH类似物对受胎率(CR)、产仔率(FR)、断奶至发情间隔(WEI)、每窝产仔数(PBL)和活产仔数(PBAL)的影响。随机效应模型用于估计95%置信区间(ci)的汇总平均差异(MDs)。采用I2统计量评估异质性,亚组分析比较注射与非注射方案。通过给药途径、授精方案、频率或人工授精方法分析亚组的效果。在纳入的27项研究中,GnRH类似物给药并没有改善CR (MD = - 0.00, 95% CI: - 0.05至0.05)或FR (MD = - 0.02, 95% CI: - 0.06至0.01)。亚组分析显示,对于任何结果,注射和非注射途径之间没有显著差异,异质性仍然很低(I2 = 0%)。总的PBL有适度的降低(MD = - 0.33, 95% CI -0.57至- 0.08),没有亚组的影响。虽然PBAL略有降低(MD = - 0.52, 95% CI -0.82至- 0.22),特别是在人工授精方案和人工授精频率的亚组中,但这一发现没有生物学解释。这些发现表明,虽然GnRH类似物对同步排卵有效,但它们对产仔数的影响在生物学上是有限的。重要的是,非注射制剂显示出与注射方法相当的结果,支持它们在商业环境中作为实用、低侵入性替代方案的潜力。为了提供可靠的胎次特异性建议,进一步的研究应包括在后备母猪和初产母猪(P1)中进行的充分有力的胎次分层随机试验。应评估传统路线和经颈后路线对单次FTAI的影响。应进行标准化GnRH类似物剂量和时间的管理,以验证排卵,控制精子数量,并预先指定结果(CR, FR, WEI, PBL和PBAL)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Injectable or non-injectable GnRH analogues for control of swine reproduction. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are widely applied in swine production to synchronise ovulation and so facilitate fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). Both injectable and non-injectable formulations are available; however, their comparative effects on reproductive performance remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, evaluated the impact of GnRH analogues on conception rate (CR), farrowing rate (FR), weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI), piglets born per litter (PBL), and piglets born alive (PBAL). Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and subgroup analyses compared injectable versus non-injectable regimens. The effect of a subgroup was analysed by administration route, insemination protocol, frequency, or AI method. Across the 27 included studies, GnRH analogue administration did not improve CR (MD = −0.00, 95 % CI: −0.05 to 0.05) or FR (MD = −0.02, 95 % CI: −0.06 to 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences between injectable and non-injectable routes for any outcome, and heterogeneity remained low (I2 = 0 %). A modest reduction in total PBL (MD = −0.33, 95 % CI –0.57 to −0.08) was evident without effect of subgroup. Although PBAL were slightly reduced (MD = −0.52, 95 % CI –0.82 to −0.22), particularly in subgroups by insemination protocol and insemination frequency there is no biological explanation for this finding. These findings suggest that while GnRH analogues are effective for synchronising ovulation, their influence on litter size is biologically modest. Importantly, non-injectable formulations demonstrated comparable outcomes to injectable approaches, supporting their potential as practical, less-invasive alternatives in commercial settings. To enable robust and parity-specific recommendations, further research should comprise adequately powered, parity-stratified randomised trials in gilts and primiparous (P1) sows. The effects of conventional and post-cervical routes on single FTAI should be assessed. Administration of standardised GnRH analogue dose and timing should be carried out to verify ovulation, control sperm numbers, and pre-specify outcomes (CR, FR, WEI, PBL, and PBAL).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theriogenology
Theriogenology 农林科学-生殖生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
387
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Theriogenology provides an international forum for researchers, clinicians, and industry professionals in animal reproductive biology. This acclaimed journal publishes articles on a wide range of topics in reproductive and developmental biology, of domestic mammal, avian, and aquatic species as well as wild species which are the object of veterinary care in research or conservation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信