诊断能力在专家服务市场中的作用

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Fang Liu , Alexander Rasch , Marco A. Schwarz , Christian Waibel
{"title":"诊断能力在专家服务市场中的作用","authors":"Fang Liu ,&nbsp;Alexander Rasch ,&nbsp;Marco A. Schwarz ,&nbsp;Christian Waibel","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. They may then exploit their informational advantage by defrauding customers. Market institutions have been shown theoretically to be effective in mitigating fraudulent expert behavior. We analyze whether this positive result carries over to a situation in which experts are heterogeneous in their diagnostic abilities. We find that efficient market outcomes are always possible. Inefficient equilibria, however, can also exist. If, in equilibrium, experts provide diagnosis-independent treatments, an increase in the experts’ ability or in the probability of high-ability experts might not improve market efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of diagnostic ability in markets for expert services\",\"authors\":\"Fang Liu ,&nbsp;Alexander Rasch ,&nbsp;Marco A. Schwarz ,&nbsp;Christian Waibel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. They may then exploit their informational advantage by defrauding customers. Market institutions have been shown theoretically to be effective in mitigating fraudulent expert behavior. We analyze whether this positive result carries over to a situation in which experts are heterogeneous in their diagnostic abilities. We find that efficient market outcomes are always possible. Inefficient equilibria, however, can also exist. If, in equilibrium, experts provide diagnosis-independent treatments, an increase in the experts’ ability or in the probability of high-ability experts might not improve market efficiency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001429212500176X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001429212500176X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在信用商品市场,专家比他们的顾客更了解适当的治疗质量。然后,他们可能利用自己的信息优势欺骗客户。从理论上讲,市场制度在减轻欺诈专家行为方面是有效的。我们分析这种积极的结果是否延续到专家在他们的诊断能力是异质的情况。我们发现,有效的市场结果总是可能的。然而,低效均衡也可能存在。如果在均衡状态下,专家提供独立于诊断的治疗,那么专家能力的提高或高能力专家出现的概率的增加可能不会提高市场效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of diagnostic ability in markets for expert services
In credence goods markets, experts have better information about the appropriate quality of treatment than their customers. They may then exploit their informational advantage by defrauding customers. Market institutions have been shown theoretically to be effective in mitigating fraudulent expert behavior. We analyze whether this positive result carries over to a situation in which experts are heterogeneous in their diagnostic abilities. We find that efficient market outcomes are always possible. Inefficient equilibria, however, can also exist. If, in equilibrium, experts provide diagnosis-independent treatments, an increase in the experts’ ability or in the probability of high-ability experts might not improve market efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信