生成式人工智能时代教师发展的重新构想：范围回顾

IF 3.9 1区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Teaching and Teacher Education Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2025.105236

Qi Tan

{"title":"生成式人工智能时代教师发展的重新构想：范围回顾","authors":"Qi Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2025.105236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative AI has great potential to revolutionize teacher development, yet reviews of its integration in this field remain limited. This scoping review analyzes 22 empirical studies, highlighting the underrepresentation of in-service teachers and small sample sizes, which raises concerns about bias. Key applications include resource development, personalized support, and creating learning environments, with intervention durations of 4–16 weeks. Seven outcomes were identified: improved learning, teacher knowledge, higher-order thinking, lesson design and implementation, self-worth and self-confidence, positive attitudes and usage intentions, and <span>AI</span> literacy. These insights can help design training programs to prepare teachers for effectively integrating generative AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 105236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining teacher development in the era of generative AI: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Qi Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tate.2025.105236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Generative AI has great potential to revolutionize teacher development, yet reviews of its integration in this field remain limited. This scoping review analyzes 22 empirical studies, highlighting the underrepresentation of in-service teachers and small sample sizes, which raises concerns about bias. Key applications include resource development, personalized support, and creating learning environments, with intervention durations of 4–16 weeks. Seven outcomes were identified: improved learning, teacher knowledge, higher-order thinking, lesson design and implementation, self-worth and self-confidence, positive attitudes and usage intentions, and <span>AI</span> literacy. These insights can help design training programs to prepare teachers for effectively integrating generative AI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25003130\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25003130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能具有革新教师发展的巨大潜力，但对其在这一领域的整合的评论仍然有限。本文分析了22项实证研究，强调了在职教师的代表性不足和样本量小，这引起了对偏见的担忧。主要应用包括资源开发、个性化支持和创造学习环境，干预持续时间为4-16周。确定了七个结果：改进学习，教师知识，高阶思维，课程设计和实施，自我价值和自信，积极的态度和使用意图，以及人工智能素养。这些见解可以帮助设计培训计划，为教师有效整合生成式人工智能做好准备。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reimagining teacher development in the era of generative AI: A scoping review

Generative AI has great potential to revolutionize teacher development, yet reviews of its integration in this field remain limited. This scoping review analyzes 22 empirical studies, highlighting the underrepresentation of in-service teachers and small sample sizes, which raises concerns about bias. Key applications include resource development, personalized support, and creating learning environments, with intervention durations of 4–16 weeks. Seven outcomes were identified: improved learning, teacher knowledge, higher-order thinking, lesson design and implementation, self-worth and self-confidence, positive attitudes and usage intentions, and AI literacy. These insights can help design training programs to prepare teachers for effectively integrating generative AI.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

12.80%

发文量

294

审稿时长

86 days

期刊介绍： Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.