生物氢生产的战略选址:通过农业生物质提高农村的可持续性

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Mehmet Seyhan , Himmet Erdi Tanürün , Nezir Aydin , Ertugrul Ayyildiz
{"title":"生物氢生产的战略选址:通过农业生物质提高农村的可持续性","authors":"Mehmet Seyhan ,&nbsp;Himmet Erdi Tanürün ,&nbsp;Nezir Aydin ,&nbsp;Ertugrul Ayyildiz","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a systematic multi-criteria decision-making framework to identify optimal sites for biomass-based hydrogen production facilities, emphasizing sustainability and rural development in developing countries. We introduce a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach that integrates the Best–Worst Method (BWM) for criteria weighting with Pythagorean Fuzzy COmbinative Distance-based ASsessment (PF-CODAS) for alternative ranking, enabling robust evaluation under uncertainty. The criteria are structured as a five-pillar framework consisting of economic market factors, environmental sustainability, resource utilization, process efficiency, and safety considerations, operationalized via 29 sub-criteria and informed by seven domain experts. Applying this approach in Türkiye, five rural locations (Konya, Adana, Balıkesir, Şanlıurfa, Samsun) were assessed, using agricultural residues as the primary feedstock context. Konya ranked first and Adana second, reflecting strong logistics and market conditions and biomass availability alongside environmental performance. BWM results highlight GHG Emission Reduction as the highest weighted sub-criterion with Water Resource Utilization, and within process efficiency, Thermal Optimization is also prominent. A sensitivity analysis showed stable rankings for the top alternative, and comparative benchmarking against two well-known methods yielded consistent top two results, underscoring methodological robustness. This study highlights the significant potential of strategically located biomass-to‑hydrogen facilities to improve rural livelihoods, support local economies, and contribute to global sustainability goals by offering a viable alternative to traditional biomass use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101838"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic site selection for biohydrogen production: Enhancing rural sustainability through agricultural biomass\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Seyhan ,&nbsp;Himmet Erdi Tanürün ,&nbsp;Nezir Aydin ,&nbsp;Ertugrul Ayyildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study develops a systematic multi-criteria decision-making framework to identify optimal sites for biomass-based hydrogen production facilities, emphasizing sustainability and rural development in developing countries. We introduce a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach that integrates the Best–Worst Method (BWM) for criteria weighting with Pythagorean Fuzzy COmbinative Distance-based ASsessment (PF-CODAS) for alternative ranking, enabling robust evaluation under uncertainty. The criteria are structured as a five-pillar framework consisting of economic market factors, environmental sustainability, resource utilization, process efficiency, and safety considerations, operationalized via 29 sub-criteria and informed by seven domain experts. Applying this approach in Türkiye, five rural locations (Konya, Adana, Balıkesir, Şanlıurfa, Samsun) were assessed, using agricultural residues as the primary feedstock context. Konya ranked first and Adana second, reflecting strong logistics and market conditions and biomass availability alongside environmental performance. BWM results highlight GHG Emission Reduction as the highest weighted sub-criterion with Water Resource Utilization, and within process efficiency, Thermal Optimization is also prominent. A sensitivity analysis showed stable rankings for the top alternative, and comparative benchmarking against two well-known methods yielded consistent top two results, underscoring methodological robustness. This study highlights the significant potential of strategically located biomass-to‑hydrogen facilities to improve rural livelihoods, support local economies, and contribute to global sustainability goals by offering a viable alternative to traditional biomass use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001887\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究开发了一个系统的多标准决策框架,以确定生物质制氢设施的最佳地点,强调发展中国家的可持续性和农村发展。我们引入了一种混合多标准决策(MCDM)方法,该方法将用于标准加权的最佳-最差方法(BWM)与用于备选排序的毕达哥拉斯模糊组合距离评估(PF-CODAS)相结合,实现了不确定性下的稳健评估。该标准是由经济市场因素、环境可持续性、资源利用、流程效率和安全因素组成的五支柱框架,通过29个子标准进行操作,并由7位领域专家提供信息。将这一方法应用于 rkiye省的五个农村地区(Konya、Adana、Balıkesir、Şanlıurfa、Samsun),以农业残留物作为主要原料进行评估。Konya排名第一,Adana排名第二,这反映了强大的物流和市场条件、生物质可用性以及环境绩效。BWM结果强调温室气体减排是水资源利用加权最高的子标准,在过程效率中,热优化也很突出。敏感性分析显示,最佳选择的排名稳定,与两种知名方法的比较基准产生一致的前两名结果,强调了方法的稳健性。本研究强调了具有战略意义的生物质制氢设施的巨大潜力,通过提供传统生物质利用的可行替代方案,可以改善农村生计,支持当地经济,并为实现全球可持续发展目标做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic site selection for biohydrogen production: Enhancing rural sustainability through agricultural biomass
This study develops a systematic multi-criteria decision-making framework to identify optimal sites for biomass-based hydrogen production facilities, emphasizing sustainability and rural development in developing countries. We introduce a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach that integrates the Best–Worst Method (BWM) for criteria weighting with Pythagorean Fuzzy COmbinative Distance-based ASsessment (PF-CODAS) for alternative ranking, enabling robust evaluation under uncertainty. The criteria are structured as a five-pillar framework consisting of economic market factors, environmental sustainability, resource utilization, process efficiency, and safety considerations, operationalized via 29 sub-criteria and informed by seven domain experts. Applying this approach in Türkiye, five rural locations (Konya, Adana, Balıkesir, Şanlıurfa, Samsun) were assessed, using agricultural residues as the primary feedstock context. Konya ranked first and Adana second, reflecting strong logistics and market conditions and biomass availability alongside environmental performance. BWM results highlight GHG Emission Reduction as the highest weighted sub-criterion with Water Resource Utilization, and within process efficiency, Thermal Optimization is also prominent. A sensitivity analysis showed stable rankings for the top alternative, and comparative benchmarking against two well-known methods yielded consistent top two results, underscoring methodological robustness. This study highlights the significant potential of strategically located biomass-to‑hydrogen facilities to improve rural livelihoods, support local economies, and contribute to global sustainability goals by offering a viable alternative to traditional biomass use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信