关于远程办公对管理和商业影响的知识:一项概念性研究

IF 15.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Reyes Gonzalez, Jose Gasco, Juan Llopis, Susana De Juana-Espinosa
{"title":"关于远程办公对管理和商业影响的知识:一项概念性研究","authors":"Reyes Gonzalez,&nbsp;Jose Gasco,&nbsp;Juan Llopis,&nbsp;Susana De Juana-Espinosa","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The need remains for a review of the literature devoted to telework, due to the exponential growth of this work format, as well as to the consequent increase in the number of publications about it. For this reason, the aim sought with this study consists in analysing the literature on telework from a Management and Business perspective. For that purpose, we examined 156 articles taken from the Social Science Citation database of the Web of Science. A content analysis about the articles in question was likewise performed in order to determine the topics underlying the telework phenomenon as a whole. The journals related to Organisation, Psychology, Technological Innovation, Gender and even Ethics also discussed these themes, revealing the transversal nature and the manifold implications of this labour modality. The main limitation faced in this research has to do with the way to select the papers under study, which can leave aside important publications dealing with telework, insofar as books, papers presented at conferences and other types of non-academic works have not been considered. The model proposed from the literature review makes it possible to see that the implementation of teleworking has had both clearly positive consequences ―e.g. staff retention, innovation and flexibility― and negative ones, among them loss of privacy, higher discrimination, stress or the isolation of the teleworker, along with variables that present ambiguous values suggesting positive as well as negative effects, such as the relationships between telework and performance, or between the former and the work/life balance, or also between teleworking and the satisfaction/well-being of the individuals who carry out this activity. The model, which can be utilised and tested in future research works, includes effects which, due to their ambiguity, require further research and deeper understanding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 6","pages":"Article 100827"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge about the impact of telework on management and business: A conceptual study\",\"authors\":\"Reyes Gonzalez,&nbsp;Jose Gasco,&nbsp;Juan Llopis,&nbsp;Susana De Juana-Espinosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The need remains for a review of the literature devoted to telework, due to the exponential growth of this work format, as well as to the consequent increase in the number of publications about it. For this reason, the aim sought with this study consists in analysing the literature on telework from a Management and Business perspective. For that purpose, we examined 156 articles taken from the Social Science Citation database of the Web of Science. A content analysis about the articles in question was likewise performed in order to determine the topics underlying the telework phenomenon as a whole. The journals related to Organisation, Psychology, Technological Innovation, Gender and even Ethics also discussed these themes, revealing the transversal nature and the manifold implications of this labour modality. The main limitation faced in this research has to do with the way to select the papers under study, which can leave aside important publications dealing with telework, insofar as books, papers presented at conferences and other types of non-academic works have not been considered. The model proposed from the literature review makes it possible to see that the implementation of teleworking has had both clearly positive consequences ―e.g. staff retention, innovation and flexibility― and negative ones, among them loss of privacy, higher discrimination, stress or the isolation of the teleworker, along with variables that present ambiguous values suggesting positive as well as negative effects, such as the relationships between telework and performance, or between the former and the work/life balance, or also between teleworking and the satisfaction/well-being of the individuals who carry out this activity. The model, which can be utilised and tested in future research works, includes effects which, due to their ambiguity, require further research and deeper understanding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001726\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于这种工作形式的指数级增长,以及随之而来的关于远程工作的出版物数量的增加,仍然需要对专门研究远程工作的文献进行审查。出于这个原因,本研究的目的在于从管理和商业的角度分析远程办公的文献。为此,我们从Web of Science的社会科学引文数据库中检索了156篇文章。还对所讨论的文章进行了内容分析,以确定整个远程工作现象背后的主题。与组织、心理学、技术创新、性别甚至伦理相关的期刊也讨论了这些主题,揭示了这种劳动形态的横向性质和多种含义。本研究面临的主要限制与选择研究论文的方式有关,这些论文可以撇开处理远程工作的重要出版物,只要没有考虑书籍,会议上发表的论文和其他类型的非学术作品。从文献综述中提出的模型可以看出,远程办公的实施已经产生了明显的积极后果。员工保留、创新和灵活性——以及消极的因素,其中包括隐私丧失、歧视加剧、远程工作者的压力或孤立,以及一些变量,这些变量呈现出模糊的值,表明积极和消极的影响,例如远程工作与绩效之间的关系,或者前者与工作/生活平衡之间的关系,或者远程工作与开展这项活动的个人的满意度/幸福感之间的关系。该模型可以在未来的研究工作中使用和测试,其中包括由于其模糊性而需要进一步研究和深入理解的效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge about the impact of telework on management and business: A conceptual study
The need remains for a review of the literature devoted to telework, due to the exponential growth of this work format, as well as to the consequent increase in the number of publications about it. For this reason, the aim sought with this study consists in analysing the literature on telework from a Management and Business perspective. For that purpose, we examined 156 articles taken from the Social Science Citation database of the Web of Science. A content analysis about the articles in question was likewise performed in order to determine the topics underlying the telework phenomenon as a whole. The journals related to Organisation, Psychology, Technological Innovation, Gender and even Ethics also discussed these themes, revealing the transversal nature and the manifold implications of this labour modality. The main limitation faced in this research has to do with the way to select the papers under study, which can leave aside important publications dealing with telework, insofar as books, papers presented at conferences and other types of non-academic works have not been considered. The model proposed from the literature review makes it possible to see that the implementation of teleworking has had both clearly positive consequences ―e.g. staff retention, innovation and flexibility― and negative ones, among them loss of privacy, higher discrimination, stress or the isolation of the teleworker, along with variables that present ambiguous values suggesting positive as well as negative effects, such as the relationships between telework and performance, or between the former and the work/life balance, or also between teleworking and the satisfaction/well-being of the individuals who carry out this activity. The model, which can be utilised and tested in future research works, includes effects which, due to their ambiguity, require further research and deeper understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信