公共交通的开环支付偏好:为无银行账户的乘客探索现金的替代方案

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Susan Pike
{"title":"公共交通的开环支付偏好:为无银行账户的乘客探索现金的替代方案","authors":"Susan Pike","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transit providers in the US and abroad are adopting open-loop payments; these systems accept credit and debit cards as well as other digital forms of payment at boarding or fare gates and do not require an agency-specific card or app. Fares are paid directly from a traveler’s existing account or card. Though these systems offer improved convenience and efficiencies, they might not be accessible to those who do not have credit or debit cards, or traditional bank accounts, i.e., the unbanked. At the same time, those who are unbanked are more likely to be lower income and of racial minorities. Similarly, these groups have higher proportions of transit-reliant individuals and households. This paper investigates the factors contributing to payment preferences of transit travelers when considering an open-loop payments system. In particular, the role of being unbanked in preferences for alternatives to cash. Using intercept survey data collected from approximately 200 individuals in Northern California, this study evaluates the payment preferences of transit users, paying particular attention to how being unbanked factors into preferences related to using various means of payment for public transit – at boarding. The results presented here suggest that being unbanked impacts the payment preferences of individuals, but familiarity, measured by past use, with different payment tools is also an important predictor. As more agencies adopt open-loop payments, recognizing the preferences and the abilities of unbanked travelers will help ensure that new systems are accessible to all travelers, even those with fewer financial tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 101652"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-loop payment preferences in public transit: Exploring alternatives to cash for unbanked riders\",\"authors\":\"Susan Pike\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transit providers in the US and abroad are adopting open-loop payments; these systems accept credit and debit cards as well as other digital forms of payment at boarding or fare gates and do not require an agency-specific card or app. Fares are paid directly from a traveler’s existing account or card. Though these systems offer improved convenience and efficiencies, they might not be accessible to those who do not have credit or debit cards, or traditional bank accounts, i.e., the unbanked. At the same time, those who are unbanked are more likely to be lower income and of racial minorities. Similarly, these groups have higher proportions of transit-reliant individuals and households. This paper investigates the factors contributing to payment preferences of transit travelers when considering an open-loop payments system. In particular, the role of being unbanked in preferences for alternatives to cash. Using intercept survey data collected from approximately 200 individuals in Northern California, this study evaluates the payment preferences of transit users, paying particular attention to how being unbanked factors into preferences related to using various means of payment for public transit – at boarding. The results presented here suggest that being unbanked impacts the payment preferences of individuals, but familiarity, measured by past use, with different payment tools is also an important predictor. As more agencies adopt open-loop payments, recognizing the preferences and the abilities of unbanked travelers will help ensure that new systems are accessible to all travelers, even those with fewer financial tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225003318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225003318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国和海外的交通服务提供商正在采用开环支付;这些系统在登机或检票口接受信用卡和借记卡以及其他数字支付方式,不需要特定的旅行社卡或应用程序。票价直接从旅客现有的账户或卡中支付。虽然这些系统提供了更好的便利和效率,但对于那些没有信用卡或借记卡或传统银行账户的人,即没有银行账户的人来说,它们可能无法使用。与此同时,那些没有银行账户的人更有可能是低收入和少数族裔。同样,这些群体有较高比例的依赖过境的个人和家庭。本文研究了当考虑开环支付系统时,影响过境旅客支付偏好的因素。特别是,没有银行账户的人在选择现金替代品方面的作用。本研究利用从北加州约200名个人收集的拦截调查数据,评估了公共交通用户的支付偏好,特别关注无银行账户因素如何影响与使用各种公共交通支付方式相关的偏好。本文的研究结果表明,没有银行账户会影响个人的支付偏好,但根据过去的使用情况衡量,对不同支付工具的熟悉程度也是一个重要的预测因素。随着越来越多的旅行社采用开环支付,认识到没有银行账户的旅行者的偏好和能力,将有助于确保所有旅行者都能使用新系统,即使是那些金融工具较少的旅行者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open-loop payment preferences in public transit: Exploring alternatives to cash for unbanked riders
Transit providers in the US and abroad are adopting open-loop payments; these systems accept credit and debit cards as well as other digital forms of payment at boarding or fare gates and do not require an agency-specific card or app. Fares are paid directly from a traveler’s existing account or card. Though these systems offer improved convenience and efficiencies, they might not be accessible to those who do not have credit or debit cards, or traditional bank accounts, i.e., the unbanked. At the same time, those who are unbanked are more likely to be lower income and of racial minorities. Similarly, these groups have higher proportions of transit-reliant individuals and households. This paper investigates the factors contributing to payment preferences of transit travelers when considering an open-loop payments system. In particular, the role of being unbanked in preferences for alternatives to cash. Using intercept survey data collected from approximately 200 individuals in Northern California, this study evaluates the payment preferences of transit users, paying particular attention to how being unbanked factors into preferences related to using various means of payment for public transit – at boarding. The results presented here suggest that being unbanked impacts the payment preferences of individuals, but familiarity, measured by past use, with different payment tools is also an important predictor. As more agencies adopt open-loop payments, recognizing the preferences and the abilities of unbanked travelers will help ensure that new systems are accessible to all travelers, even those with fewer financial tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信