以十水合硫酸钠和十水合碳酸钠为储能材料的半球形太阳能蒸馏器试验研究:环境与经济分析

IF 5.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
S. Mohamed Illyas , A. MuthuManokar , A.E. Kabeel , V. Selvakumar
{"title":"以十水合硫酸钠和十水合碳酸钠为储能材料的半球形太阳能蒸馏器试验研究:环境与经济分析","authors":"S. Mohamed Illyas ,&nbsp;A. MuthuManokar ,&nbsp;A.E. Kabeel ,&nbsp;V. Selvakumar","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study focuses on improving the performance of hemi spherical solar still (HSS) using hydrated salts – Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate (SSD), Sodium Carbonate Decahydrate (SCD) as energy storage materials and graphite plates. The performance of the modified solar still (MSS) is compared with the conventional solar still (CSS) in terms of clean water production, economics and environmental impact. The DSC curve shows a higher latent heat and broader melting-solidification range for SSD compared with SCD providing longer heat retention. The latent heat released by the salts in the MSS maintains a higher water temperature and vapor pressure than the CSS, creating a larger vapor pressure gradient that drives evaporation and results in 83.20 % increase in the evaporative heat transfer coefficient during 17.00–20.00 hrs. While the day time and night time distillate productivity of MSS-SSD is 15.20 % and 154.40 % respectively higher than CSS, the productivity of MSS-SCD is 12.80 % and 133.30 % higher when compared to CSS. The cost per liter for MSS-SSD is 19 % lower than CSS and it is 17 % cheaper for MSS-SCD. Enviro economic analysis shows that the net CO<sub>2</sub> emitted for CSS, MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD were estimated as 188.42, 313.54 and 311.16 kg respectively. The CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation potential is relatively higher for MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD which are mitigated 24 tons and 22.6 tons with over their life time compared with 16.8 tons from CSS. The carbon credit earned during the 5th year is $79.3 and an average value of $109.5 for the CSS and MSS respectively. The MSS accounts for an increase in carbon credit earning to 38 % in the 10th year and it is 39 % in 15th year when compared to CSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 104139"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of hemispherical solar still using sodium sulfate decahydrate and sodium carbonate decahydrate as energy storage materials: An enviro and economic analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Mohamed Illyas ,&nbsp;A. MuthuManokar ,&nbsp;A.E. Kabeel ,&nbsp;V. Selvakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The present study focuses on improving the performance of hemi spherical solar still (HSS) using hydrated salts – Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate (SSD), Sodium Carbonate Decahydrate (SCD) as energy storage materials and graphite plates. The performance of the modified solar still (MSS) is compared with the conventional solar still (CSS) in terms of clean water production, economics and environmental impact. The DSC curve shows a higher latent heat and broader melting-solidification range for SSD compared with SCD providing longer heat retention. The latent heat released by the salts in the MSS maintains a higher water temperature and vapor pressure than the CSS, creating a larger vapor pressure gradient that drives evaporation and results in 83.20 % increase in the evaporative heat transfer coefficient during 17.00–20.00 hrs. While the day time and night time distillate productivity of MSS-SSD is 15.20 % and 154.40 % respectively higher than CSS, the productivity of MSS-SCD is 12.80 % and 133.30 % higher when compared to CSS. The cost per liter for MSS-SSD is 19 % lower than CSS and it is 17 % cheaper for MSS-SCD. Enviro economic analysis shows that the net CO<sub>2</sub> emitted for CSS, MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD were estimated as 188.42, 313.54 and 311.16 kg respectively. The CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation potential is relatively higher for MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD which are mitigated 24 tons and 22.6 tons with over their life time compared with 16.8 tons from CSS. The carbon credit earned during the 5th year is $79.3 and an average value of $109.5 for the CSS and MSS respectively. The MSS accounts for an increase in carbon credit earning to 38 % in the 10th year and it is 39 % in 15th year when compared to CSS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用水合盐——十水硫酸钠(SSD)、十水碳酸钠(SCD)作为储能材料和石墨板,研究了提高半球形太阳能蒸馏器(HSS)性能的方法。从清洁产水、经济性和环境影响等方面,比较了改性太阳能蒸馏器(MSS)与传统太阳能蒸馏器(CSS)的性能。DSC曲线显示固态固态合金具有更高的潜热和更宽的熔融凝固范围,且具有更长的保温时间。在17.00 ~ 20.00 h内,盐类释放的潜热维持了比CSS更高的水温和蒸汽压,形成了更大的蒸汽压梯度,推动了蒸发,蒸发换热系数增加了83.20%。MSS-SSD的白天和夜间馏分率分别比CSS高15.20%和154.40%,而MSS-SCD的白天和夜间馏分率分别比CSS高12.80%和133.30%。MSS-SSD的每升成本比CSS低19%,MSS-SCD的每升成本低17%。环境经济分析表明,CSS、MSS-SSD和MSS-SCD的净CO2排放量分别为188.42、313.54和311.16 kg。与CSS的16.8吨相比,MSS-SSD和MSS-SCD的二氧化碳减排潜力相对较高,在其寿命期内分别减少了24吨和22.6吨。第5年获得的碳信用额为79.3美元,CSS和MSS的平均价值分别为109.5美元。与CSS相比,MSS在第10年增加了38%的碳信用收入,在第15年增加了39%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study of hemispherical solar still using sodium sulfate decahydrate and sodium carbonate decahydrate as energy storage materials: An enviro and economic analysis
The present study focuses on improving the performance of hemi spherical solar still (HSS) using hydrated salts – Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate (SSD), Sodium Carbonate Decahydrate (SCD) as energy storage materials and graphite plates. The performance of the modified solar still (MSS) is compared with the conventional solar still (CSS) in terms of clean water production, economics and environmental impact. The DSC curve shows a higher latent heat and broader melting-solidification range for SSD compared with SCD providing longer heat retention. The latent heat released by the salts in the MSS maintains a higher water temperature and vapor pressure than the CSS, creating a larger vapor pressure gradient that drives evaporation and results in 83.20 % increase in the evaporative heat transfer coefficient during 17.00–20.00 hrs. While the day time and night time distillate productivity of MSS-SSD is 15.20 % and 154.40 % respectively higher than CSS, the productivity of MSS-SCD is 12.80 % and 133.30 % higher when compared to CSS. The cost per liter for MSS-SSD is 19 % lower than CSS and it is 17 % cheaper for MSS-SCD. Enviro economic analysis shows that the net CO2 emitted for CSS, MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD were estimated as 188.42, 313.54 and 311.16 kg respectively. The CO2 mitigation potential is relatively higher for MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD which are mitigated 24 tons and 22.6 tons with over their life time compared with 16.8 tons from CSS. The carbon credit earned during the 5th year is $79.3 and an average value of $109.5 for the CSS and MSS respectively. The MSS accounts for an increase in carbon credit earning to 38 % in the 10th year and it is 39 % in 15th year when compared to CSS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
327
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信