S. Mohamed Illyas , A. MuthuManokar , A.E. Kabeel , V. Selvakumar
{"title":"以十水合硫酸钠和十水合碳酸钠为储能材料的半球形太阳能蒸馏器试验研究:环境与经济分析","authors":"S. Mohamed Illyas , A. MuthuManokar , A.E. Kabeel , V. Selvakumar","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study focuses on improving the performance of hemi spherical solar still (HSS) using hydrated salts – Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate (SSD), Sodium Carbonate Decahydrate (SCD) as energy storage materials and graphite plates. The performance of the modified solar still (MSS) is compared with the conventional solar still (CSS) in terms of clean water production, economics and environmental impact. The DSC curve shows a higher latent heat and broader melting-solidification range for SSD compared with SCD providing longer heat retention. The latent heat released by the salts in the MSS maintains a higher water temperature and vapor pressure than the CSS, creating a larger vapor pressure gradient that drives evaporation and results in 83.20 % increase in the evaporative heat transfer coefficient during 17.00–20.00 hrs. While the day time and night time distillate productivity of MSS-SSD is 15.20 % and 154.40 % respectively higher than CSS, the productivity of MSS-SCD is 12.80 % and 133.30 % higher when compared to CSS. The cost per liter for MSS-SSD is 19 % lower than CSS and it is 17 % cheaper for MSS-SCD. Enviro economic analysis shows that the net CO<sub>2</sub> emitted for CSS, MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD were estimated as 188.42, 313.54 and 311.16 kg respectively. The CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation potential is relatively higher for MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD which are mitigated 24 tons and 22.6 tons with over their life time compared with 16.8 tons from CSS. The carbon credit earned during the 5th year is $79.3 and an average value of $109.5 for the CSS and MSS respectively. The MSS accounts for an increase in carbon credit earning to 38 % in the 10th year and it is 39 % in 15th year when compared to CSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 104139"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of hemispherical solar still using sodium sulfate decahydrate and sodium carbonate decahydrate as energy storage materials: An enviro and economic analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Mohamed Illyas , A. MuthuManokar , A.E. Kabeel , V. Selvakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The present study focuses on improving the performance of hemi spherical solar still (HSS) using hydrated salts – Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate (SSD), Sodium Carbonate Decahydrate (SCD) as energy storage materials and graphite plates. The performance of the modified solar still (MSS) is compared with the conventional solar still (CSS) in terms of clean water production, economics and environmental impact. The DSC curve shows a higher latent heat and broader melting-solidification range for SSD compared with SCD providing longer heat retention. The latent heat released by the salts in the MSS maintains a higher water temperature and vapor pressure than the CSS, creating a larger vapor pressure gradient that drives evaporation and results in 83.20 % increase in the evaporative heat transfer coefficient during 17.00–20.00 hrs. While the day time and night time distillate productivity of MSS-SSD is 15.20 % and 154.40 % respectively higher than CSS, the productivity of MSS-SCD is 12.80 % and 133.30 % higher when compared to CSS. The cost per liter for MSS-SSD is 19 % lower than CSS and it is 17 % cheaper for MSS-SCD. Enviro economic analysis shows that the net CO<sub>2</sub> emitted for CSS, MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD were estimated as 188.42, 313.54 and 311.16 kg respectively. The CO<sub>2</sub> mitigation potential is relatively higher for MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD which are mitigated 24 tons and 22.6 tons with over their life time compared with 16.8 tons from CSS. The carbon credit earned during the 5th year is $79.3 and an average value of $109.5 for the CSS and MSS respectively. The MSS accounts for an increase in carbon credit earning to 38 % in the 10th year and it is 39 % in 15th year when compared to CSS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental study of hemispherical solar still using sodium sulfate decahydrate and sodium carbonate decahydrate as energy storage materials: An enviro and economic analysis
The present study focuses on improving the performance of hemi spherical solar still (HSS) using hydrated salts – Sodium Sulfate Decahydrate (SSD), Sodium Carbonate Decahydrate (SCD) as energy storage materials and graphite plates. The performance of the modified solar still (MSS) is compared with the conventional solar still (CSS) in terms of clean water production, economics and environmental impact. The DSC curve shows a higher latent heat and broader melting-solidification range for SSD compared with SCD providing longer heat retention. The latent heat released by the salts in the MSS maintains a higher water temperature and vapor pressure than the CSS, creating a larger vapor pressure gradient that drives evaporation and results in 83.20 % increase in the evaporative heat transfer coefficient during 17.00–20.00 hrs. While the day time and night time distillate productivity of MSS-SSD is 15.20 % and 154.40 % respectively higher than CSS, the productivity of MSS-SCD is 12.80 % and 133.30 % higher when compared to CSS. The cost per liter for MSS-SSD is 19 % lower than CSS and it is 17 % cheaper for MSS-SCD. Enviro economic analysis shows that the net CO2 emitted for CSS, MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD were estimated as 188.42, 313.54 and 311.16 kg respectively. The CO2 mitigation potential is relatively higher for MSS-SSD and MSS-SCD which are mitigated 24 tons and 22.6 tons with over their life time compared with 16.8 tons from CSS. The carbon credit earned during the 5th year is $79.3 and an average value of $109.5 for the CSS and MSS respectively. The MSS accounts for an increase in carbon credit earning to 38 % in the 10th year and it is 39 % in 15th year when compared to CSS.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.