{"title":"巴西水务公司的私有化道路:财务地位的作用","authors":"Carlos Motta Nunes , Rui Cunha Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the 2020 reform of Brazil’s water supply and sanitation (WSS) sector, private provision of these services has expanded sharply. Major cities such as São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro are now served by private operators, primarily following the privatization of their state-owned companies, either by share sale or through concession contracts. Brazil is thus one of the most prominent markets for private WSS provision in the world. The objective of this study is to investigate the main factors associated with WSS privatization in Brazil, focusing on utility-level variables. While previous research has emphasized municipal-level factors such as fiscal health, economic efficiency, and party ideology, utility-level effects remain understudied. Drawing from the literature on privatization motivations, we hypothesize that municipalities served by utilities with greater investment needs, lower efficiency, and poorer service quality are more likely to privatize. Using a dataset covering 5397 municipalities from 2012 to 2023, we apply discrete-time duration analysis to account for time-varying factors. We find little evidence supporting our hypotheses. Instead, utility-level financial indicators emerge as the most relevant, suggesting privatization is more likely when its financial standing is strong. Our findings also confirm the importance of municipal-level factors. Using Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework, we argue that privatization in Brazil is more likely when there is a convergence of political, technical, and financial conditions, alongside private sector interest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102052"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privatization pathways in Brazilian water utilities: The role of financial standing\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Motta Nunes , Rui Cunha Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since the 2020 reform of Brazil’s water supply and sanitation (WSS) sector, private provision of these services has expanded sharply. Major cities such as São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro are now served by private operators, primarily following the privatization of their state-owned companies, either by share sale or through concession contracts. Brazil is thus one of the most prominent markets for private WSS provision in the world. The objective of this study is to investigate the main factors associated with WSS privatization in Brazil, focusing on utility-level variables. While previous research has emphasized municipal-level factors such as fiscal health, economic efficiency, and party ideology, utility-level effects remain understudied. Drawing from the literature on privatization motivations, we hypothesize that municipalities served by utilities with greater investment needs, lower efficiency, and poorer service quality are more likely to privatize. Using a dataset covering 5397 municipalities from 2012 to 2023, we apply discrete-time duration analysis to account for time-varying factors. We find little evidence supporting our hypotheses. Instead, utility-level financial indicators emerge as the most relevant, suggesting privatization is more likely when its financial standing is strong. Our findings also confirm the importance of municipal-level factors. Using Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework, we argue that privatization in Brazil is more likely when there is a convergence of political, technical, and financial conditions, alongside private sector interest.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Privatization pathways in Brazilian water utilities: The role of financial standing
Since the 2020 reform of Brazil’s water supply and sanitation (WSS) sector, private provision of these services has expanded sharply. Major cities such as São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro are now served by private operators, primarily following the privatization of their state-owned companies, either by share sale or through concession contracts. Brazil is thus one of the most prominent markets for private WSS provision in the world. The objective of this study is to investigate the main factors associated with WSS privatization in Brazil, focusing on utility-level variables. While previous research has emphasized municipal-level factors such as fiscal health, economic efficiency, and party ideology, utility-level effects remain understudied. Drawing from the literature on privatization motivations, we hypothesize that municipalities served by utilities with greater investment needs, lower efficiency, and poorer service quality are more likely to privatize. Using a dataset covering 5397 municipalities from 2012 to 2023, we apply discrete-time duration analysis to account for time-varying factors. We find little evidence supporting our hypotheses. Instead, utility-level financial indicators emerge as the most relevant, suggesting privatization is more likely when its financial standing is strong. Our findings also confirm the importance of municipal-level factors. Using Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework, we argue that privatization in Brazil is more likely when there is a convergence of political, technical, and financial conditions, alongside private sector interest.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.