利用土壤结构视觉评价(VESS)评价喀麦隆西部高地土壤物理退化

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Alain N. Choullin , Francis B.T. Silatsa , Etienne Mboua , Martin Jemo , Georges M. Ndzana , Dieudonne Bitondo
{"title":"利用土壤结构视觉评价(VESS)评价喀麦隆西部高地土壤物理退化","authors":"Alain N. Choullin ,&nbsp;Francis B.T. Silatsa ,&nbsp;Etienne Mboua ,&nbsp;Martin Jemo ,&nbsp;Georges M. Ndzana ,&nbsp;Dieudonne Bitondo","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identifying key soil physical indicators is crucial for strengthening efforts to conserve fragile ecosystems and ensure food security. This study investigates the effects of land use, topographic position, and soil texture on the variation of physical soil indicators in the highland of Cameroon. The Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) was the primary proxy for assessing structural soil quality. A stratified nested random sampling design was used to sample soils across land use types, specifically the forest (FS), Agroforestry systems (AGF), natural fallow (FLW), Eucalyptus fields (ECP), Crop fields (CRL), and Grazing land (GRL). We found that many soil's physical indicators differed based on land use and textural classes, as did the soil structure, with FS and AGF showing the best values, whilst GRL, CRL, and ECP exhibited the lowest. A deviation of about 50 % emerged between the FS reference and many other land uses for many soil indicators, witnessing a high soil structural swing in the landscape. However, the topographic position did not show a significant variability (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) of any soil physical indicators, implying that soil variability is mainly anthropogenic. The soil physical quality index (SQI) sequence for land use is FS &gt; AGF &gt; CRL &gt; FLW &gt; ECP &gt; GRL, with the highest value (0.56) in FS and the lowest in GRL (0.34). The SQI and VESS Scores are strongly and negatively related. The VESS method can serve as a valuable tool for quickly assessing physical land degradation conditions, monitoring soil degradation, and providing decision support in highland agroecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 106881"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appraising soil physical degradation using the Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) in the Western Highlands, Cameroon\",\"authors\":\"Alain N. Choullin ,&nbsp;Francis B.T. Silatsa ,&nbsp;Etienne Mboua ,&nbsp;Martin Jemo ,&nbsp;Georges M. Ndzana ,&nbsp;Dieudonne Bitondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Identifying key soil physical indicators is crucial for strengthening efforts to conserve fragile ecosystems and ensure food security. This study investigates the effects of land use, topographic position, and soil texture on the variation of physical soil indicators in the highland of Cameroon. The Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) was the primary proxy for assessing structural soil quality. A stratified nested random sampling design was used to sample soils across land use types, specifically the forest (FS), Agroforestry systems (AGF), natural fallow (FLW), Eucalyptus fields (ECP), Crop fields (CRL), and Grazing land (GRL). We found that many soil's physical indicators differed based on land use and textural classes, as did the soil structure, with FS and AGF showing the best values, whilst GRL, CRL, and ECP exhibited the lowest. A deviation of about 50 % emerged between the FS reference and many other land uses for many soil indicators, witnessing a high soil structural swing in the landscape. However, the topographic position did not show a significant variability (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) of any soil physical indicators, implying that soil variability is mainly anthropogenic. The soil physical quality index (SQI) sequence for land use is FS &gt; AGF &gt; CRL &gt; FLW &gt; ECP &gt; GRL, with the highest value (0.56) in FS and the lowest in GRL (0.34). The SQI and VESS Scores are strongly and negatively related. The VESS method can serve as a valuable tool for quickly assessing physical land degradation conditions, monitoring soil degradation, and providing decision support in highland agroecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725004350\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725004350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定关键土壤物理指标对于加强保护脆弱生态系统和确保粮食安全的努力至关重要。本文研究了喀麦隆高原土地利用、地形位置和土壤质地对土壤物理指标变化的影响。土壤结构目视评价(VESS)是评价结构性土壤质量的主要指标。采用分层嵌套随机抽样设计,对不同土地利用类型的土壤进行采样,包括森林(FS)、农林复合系统(AGF)、自然休耕(FLW)、桉树田(ECP)、农田(CRL)和放牧地(GRL)。研究发现,不同土地利用、不同质地、不同结构的土壤理化指标存在差异,其中FS和AGF表现最佳,而GRL、CRL和ECP表现最差。在许多土壤指标中,FS参考值与许多其他土地用途之间的偏差约为50% %,表明景观中的土壤结构波动很大。然而,地形位置对土壤物理指标均未表现出显著的变异(p >; 0.05),表明土壤变异主要是人为的。土地利用土壤物理质量指数(SQI)排序为FS >; AGF >; CRL >; FLW >; ECP >; GRL, FS最高(0.56),GRL最低(0.34)。SQI与VESS得分呈显著负相关。VESS方法可作为一种有价值的工具,用于快速评估土地自然退化状况,监测土壤退化,并为高原农业生态系统提供决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appraising soil physical degradation using the Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) in the Western Highlands, Cameroon
Identifying key soil physical indicators is crucial for strengthening efforts to conserve fragile ecosystems and ensure food security. This study investigates the effects of land use, topographic position, and soil texture on the variation of physical soil indicators in the highland of Cameroon. The Visual Evaluation of Soil Structure (VESS) was the primary proxy for assessing structural soil quality. A stratified nested random sampling design was used to sample soils across land use types, specifically the forest (FS), Agroforestry systems (AGF), natural fallow (FLW), Eucalyptus fields (ECP), Crop fields (CRL), and Grazing land (GRL). We found that many soil's physical indicators differed based on land use and textural classes, as did the soil structure, with FS and AGF showing the best values, whilst GRL, CRL, and ECP exhibited the lowest. A deviation of about 50 % emerged between the FS reference and many other land uses for many soil indicators, witnessing a high soil structural swing in the landscape. However, the topographic position did not show a significant variability (p > 0.05) of any soil physical indicators, implying that soil variability is mainly anthropogenic. The soil physical quality index (SQI) sequence for land use is FS > AGF > CRL > FLW > ECP > GRL, with the highest value (0.56) in FS and the lowest in GRL (0.34). The SQI and VESS Scores are strongly and negatively related. The VESS method can serve as a valuable tool for quickly assessing physical land degradation conditions, monitoring soil degradation, and providing decision support in highland agroecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信