{"title":"作为战略回应的数字创新:拥有非正式权力的CEO如何处理不一致的绩效反馈","authors":"Weiwei Wu , Xue Li , Yexin Liu , Yanggi Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital innovation has emerged as a crucial organizational strategy. Existing research on the antecedents of digital innovation often overlooks its inherent attributes as strategic response. According to the behavior theory of firm (BTOF), managers perceive and assessment from performance feedback and thereby critically shape organizational responses. This subjectivity means that managerial cognition fundamentally influences how performance feedback is understood and acted upon. Thus, this study explores how CEO informal power—to interpret inconsistent feedback—influences the impact of inconsistent feedback (that is, negative feedback and positive prospects) on digital innovation. Using Chinese manufacturing firms during 2015–2020, this study revealed that firms engage in less digital innovation as a response to inconsistent feedback when the firm's CEO has more prestige power or expert power. Further, the negative impact of the CEO prestige power on the relationship between inconsistent feedback and digital innovation is greater when CEO expert power is high. This study highlights the significance of individual-level mechanisms within the BTOF framework. It also advances BTOF in backward-and forward-looking reference points research and heterogeneity in performance feedback. Besides, it contributes to the literature on digital innovation as strategic response behavior by identifying the driving mechanism of organizational adaptation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 124354"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital innovation as strategic response: How CEO with informal power deal with inconsistent performance feedback\",\"authors\":\"Weiwei Wu , Xue Li , Yexin Liu , Yanggi Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digital innovation has emerged as a crucial organizational strategy. Existing research on the antecedents of digital innovation often overlooks its inherent attributes as strategic response. According to the behavior theory of firm (BTOF), managers perceive and assessment from performance feedback and thereby critically shape organizational responses. This subjectivity means that managerial cognition fundamentally influences how performance feedback is understood and acted upon. Thus, this study explores how CEO informal power—to interpret inconsistent feedback—influences the impact of inconsistent feedback (that is, negative feedback and positive prospects) on digital innovation. Using Chinese manufacturing firms during 2015–2020, this study revealed that firms engage in less digital innovation as a response to inconsistent feedback when the firm's CEO has more prestige power or expert power. Further, the negative impact of the CEO prestige power on the relationship between inconsistent feedback and digital innovation is greater when CEO expert power is high. This study highlights the significance of individual-level mechanisms within the BTOF framework. It also advances BTOF in backward-and forward-looking reference points research and heterogeneity in performance feedback. Besides, it contributes to the literature on digital innovation as strategic response behavior by identifying the driving mechanism of organizational adaptation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003853\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003853","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital innovation as strategic response: How CEO with informal power deal with inconsistent performance feedback
Digital innovation has emerged as a crucial organizational strategy. Existing research on the antecedents of digital innovation often overlooks its inherent attributes as strategic response. According to the behavior theory of firm (BTOF), managers perceive and assessment from performance feedback and thereby critically shape organizational responses. This subjectivity means that managerial cognition fundamentally influences how performance feedback is understood and acted upon. Thus, this study explores how CEO informal power—to interpret inconsistent feedback—influences the impact of inconsistent feedback (that is, negative feedback and positive prospects) on digital innovation. Using Chinese manufacturing firms during 2015–2020, this study revealed that firms engage in less digital innovation as a response to inconsistent feedback when the firm's CEO has more prestige power or expert power. Further, the negative impact of the CEO prestige power on the relationship between inconsistent feedback and digital innovation is greater when CEO expert power is high. This study highlights the significance of individual-level mechanisms within the BTOF framework. It also advances BTOF in backward-and forward-looking reference points research and heterogeneity in performance feedback. Besides, it contributes to the literature on digital innovation as strategic response behavior by identifying the driving mechanism of organizational adaptation.
期刊介绍:
Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors.
In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.