远程眼保健:贝宁市患者和眼保健从业人员的观点和接受程度

God’sglory Isoken Braimoh, Faustina Idu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu
{"title":"远程眼保健:贝宁市患者和眼保健从业人员的观点和接受程度","authors":"God’sglory Isoken Braimoh,&nbsp;Faustina Idu,&nbsp;Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess awareness, acceptance, and perceived barriers to tele-eye care among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months among 332 patients attending clinics and 56 licensed eye care practitioners (optometrists and ophthalmologists). A structured questionnaire, adapted from prior studies, was administered via Google Forms. Practitioners received the survey through professional WhatsApp groups, while patients completed it during clinic visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square, <em>t</em>-tests, and logistic regression) to assess associations, with significance set at <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Awareness of tele-eye care was modest among patients (47.6 %), and prior use was low (25.3 %), yet willingness to adopt mobile-based applications was high (88.6 %). Patients’ main concerns included reduced quality of care (81.3 %), limited personal interaction (53.0 %), and privacy risks (51.5 %). Most practitioners (93 %) were familiar with telemedicine, though only 32 % reported its use in their clinics. While 84 % believed it could expand access to care, concerns included diagnostic accuracy (67.9 %), restricted service applicability (73.2 %), and insufficient practitioner training (75 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both patients and practitioners in Benin City expressed strong interest in tele-eye care, though actual use remains limited. Adoption is constrained by service limitations, privacy concerns, and inadequate training. Targeted practitioner education, improved digital infrastructure, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate broader integration of tele-eye care into routine practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tele-eye care: Perspective and acceptance among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City\",\"authors\":\"God’sglory Isoken Braimoh,&nbsp;Faustina Idu,&nbsp;Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess awareness, acceptance, and perceived barriers to tele-eye care among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months among 332 patients attending clinics and 56 licensed eye care practitioners (optometrists and ophthalmologists). A structured questionnaire, adapted from prior studies, was administered via Google Forms. Practitioners received the survey through professional WhatsApp groups, while patients completed it during clinic visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square, <em>t</em>-tests, and logistic regression) to assess associations, with significance set at <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Awareness of tele-eye care was modest among patients (47.6 %), and prior use was low (25.3 %), yet willingness to adopt mobile-based applications was high (88.6 %). Patients’ main concerns included reduced quality of care (81.3 %), limited personal interaction (53.0 %), and privacy risks (51.5 %). Most practitioners (93 %) were familiar with telemedicine, though only 32 % reported its use in their clinics. While 84 % believed it could expand access to care, concerns included diagnostic accuracy (67.9 %), restricted service applicability (73.2 %), and insufficient practitioner training (75 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both patients and practitioners in Benin City expressed strong interest in tele-eye care, though actual use remains limited. Adoption is constrained by service limitations, privacy concerns, and inadequate training. Targeted practitioner education, improved digital infrastructure, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate broader integration of tele-eye care into routine practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估尼日利亚贝宁市患者和眼科医生对远程眼保健的认识、接受程度和感知障碍。方法对就诊的332例患者和56名眼科执业医师(验光师和眼科医生)进行为期3个月的横断面调查。通过谷歌表格进行结构化问卷调查,该问卷改编自先前的研究。从业人员通过专业的WhatsApp群接受调查,而患者在诊所就诊时完成调查。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理检验(卡方检验、t检验和逻辑回归)来评估相关性,显著性设置为p <; 0.05。结果患者对远程眼保健的认知度一般(47.6%),既往使用过的比例较低(25.3%),但采用移动端应用程序的意愿较高(88.6%)。患者的主要担忧包括护理质量下降(81.3%)、人际互动有限(53.0%)和隐私风险(51.5%)。大多数从业者(93%)熟悉远程医疗,尽管只有32%的人报告在他们的诊所使用了远程医疗。虽然84%的人认为它可以扩大获得医疗服务的机会,但他们担心的问题包括诊断准确性(67.9%)、服务适用性受限(73.2%)和从业人员培训不足(75%)。结论贝宁市的患者和医生都对远程眼保健表达了浓厚的兴趣,但实际应用仍然有限。采用受到服务限制、隐私问题和培训不足的限制。需要有针对性的从业者教育、改进的数字基础设施和明确的监管框架,以促进将远程眼科护理更广泛地纳入日常实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tele-eye care: Perspective and acceptance among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City

Purpose

To assess awareness, acceptance, and perceived barriers to tele-eye care among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months among 332 patients attending clinics and 56 licensed eye care practitioners (optometrists and ophthalmologists). A structured questionnaire, adapted from prior studies, was administered via Google Forms. Practitioners received the survey through professional WhatsApp groups, while patients completed it during clinic visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square, t-tests, and logistic regression) to assess associations, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

Awareness of tele-eye care was modest among patients (47.6 %), and prior use was low (25.3 %), yet willingness to adopt mobile-based applications was high (88.6 %). Patients’ main concerns included reduced quality of care (81.3 %), limited personal interaction (53.0 %), and privacy risks (51.5 %). Most practitioners (93 %) were familiar with telemedicine, though only 32 % reported its use in their clinics. While 84 % believed it could expand access to care, concerns included diagnostic accuracy (67.9 %), restricted service applicability (73.2 %), and insufficient practitioner training (75 %).

Conclusion

Both patients and practitioners in Benin City expressed strong interest in tele-eye care, though actual use remains limited. Adoption is constrained by service limitations, privacy concerns, and inadequate training. Targeted practitioner education, improved digital infrastructure, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate broader integration of tele-eye care into routine practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信