God’sglory Isoken Braimoh, Faustina Idu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu
{"title":"远程眼保健:贝宁市患者和眼保健从业人员的观点和接受程度","authors":"God’sglory Isoken Braimoh, Faustina Idu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess awareness, acceptance, and perceived barriers to tele-eye care among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months among 332 patients attending clinics and 56 licensed eye care practitioners (optometrists and ophthalmologists). A structured questionnaire, adapted from prior studies, was administered via Google Forms. Practitioners received the survey through professional WhatsApp groups, while patients completed it during clinic visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square, <em>t</em>-tests, and logistic regression) to assess associations, with significance set at <em>p</em> < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Awareness of tele-eye care was modest among patients (47.6 %), and prior use was low (25.3 %), yet willingness to adopt mobile-based applications was high (88.6 %). Patients’ main concerns included reduced quality of care (81.3 %), limited personal interaction (53.0 %), and privacy risks (51.5 %). Most practitioners (93 %) were familiar with telemedicine, though only 32 % reported its use in their clinics. While 84 % believed it could expand access to care, concerns included diagnostic accuracy (67.9 %), restricted service applicability (73.2 %), and insufficient practitioner training (75 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both patients and practitioners in Benin City expressed strong interest in tele-eye care, though actual use remains limited. Adoption is constrained by service limitations, privacy concerns, and inadequate training. Targeted practitioner education, improved digital infrastructure, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate broader integration of tele-eye care into routine practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tele-eye care: Perspective and acceptance among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City\",\"authors\":\"God’sglory Isoken Braimoh, Faustina Idu, Clinton Ifeanyi Okechukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess awareness, acceptance, and perceived barriers to tele-eye care among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months among 332 patients attending clinics and 56 licensed eye care practitioners (optometrists and ophthalmologists). A structured questionnaire, adapted from prior studies, was administered via Google Forms. Practitioners received the survey through professional WhatsApp groups, while patients completed it during clinic visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square, <em>t</em>-tests, and logistic regression) to assess associations, with significance set at <em>p</em> < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Awareness of tele-eye care was modest among patients (47.6 %), and prior use was low (25.3 %), yet willingness to adopt mobile-based applications was high (88.6 %). Patients’ main concerns included reduced quality of care (81.3 %), limited personal interaction (53.0 %), and privacy risks (51.5 %). Most practitioners (93 %) were familiar with telemedicine, though only 32 % reported its use in their clinics. While 84 % believed it could expand access to care, concerns included diagnostic accuracy (67.9 %), restricted service applicability (73.2 %), and insufficient practitioner training (75 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both patients and practitioners in Benin City expressed strong interest in tele-eye care, though actual use remains limited. Adoption is constrained by service limitations, privacy concerns, and inadequate training. Targeted practitioner education, improved digital infrastructure, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate broader integration of tele-eye care into routine practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tele-eye care: Perspective and acceptance among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City
Purpose
To assess awareness, acceptance, and perceived barriers to tele-eye care among patients and eye care practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted over three months among 332 patients attending clinics and 56 licensed eye care practitioners (optometrists and ophthalmologists). A structured questionnaire, adapted from prior studies, was administered via Google Forms. Practitioners received the survey through professional WhatsApp groups, while patients completed it during clinic visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (chi-square, t-tests, and logistic regression) to assess associations, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
Awareness of tele-eye care was modest among patients (47.6 %), and prior use was low (25.3 %), yet willingness to adopt mobile-based applications was high (88.6 %). Patients’ main concerns included reduced quality of care (81.3 %), limited personal interaction (53.0 %), and privacy risks (51.5 %). Most practitioners (93 %) were familiar with telemedicine, though only 32 % reported its use in their clinics. While 84 % believed it could expand access to care, concerns included diagnostic accuracy (67.9 %), restricted service applicability (73.2 %), and insufficient practitioner training (75 %).
Conclusion
Both patients and practitioners in Benin City expressed strong interest in tele-eye care, though actual use remains limited. Adoption is constrained by service limitations, privacy concerns, and inadequate training. Targeted practitioner education, improved digital infrastructure, and clear regulatory frameworks are needed to facilitate broader integration of tele-eye care into routine practice.