增强现实对生物多样性学习影响的实验研究

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Julien Mercier , Laura Leon Perez , Catherine Audrin , Erwan Bocher , Olivier Ertz , Emmanuel Sander
{"title":"增强现实对生物多样性学习影响的实验研究","authors":"Julien Mercier ,&nbsp;Laura Leon Perez ,&nbsp;Catherine Audrin ,&nbsp;Erwan Bocher ,&nbsp;Olivier Ertz ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Sander","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Learning about biodiversity – both conceptually and in practice – is key to fostering pro-environmental behaviors, yet it is difficult to teach because it spans multiple disciplines and meanings. Augmented reality (AR) can enhance engagement, motivation, and learning, while outdoor experiences are known to strengthen environmental affects. We therefore examined whether location-based AR is more effective than a non-digital resource for biodiversity learning within an analogical-reasoning teaching sequence. In a crossover experiment, 169 French-speaking Swiss pupils (aged 12–17) explored two nature areas containing differentiated content. Each pupil used AR in one area and a paper-based resource in the other; footsteps were measured with pedometers, and pupils completed multiple-choice questionnaires and psychometric scales. Relative to the non-digital condition, location-based AR led to higher theoretical knowledge scores and greater nature exploration (footsteps). However, we observed no significant differences in environmental affects. These findings contribute empirical evidence on AR for biodiversity education that can help educators develop learning activities that meet their pedagogical goals: location-based AR can bolster knowledge and exploration, yet – under the present design – it may not translate into broad affective change. We discuss implications for aligning AR design with motivational scaffolds and nature connectedness goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100801"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of augmented reality on biodiversity learning: An experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Julien Mercier ,&nbsp;Laura Leon Perez ,&nbsp;Catherine Audrin ,&nbsp;Erwan Bocher ,&nbsp;Olivier Ertz ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Sander\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Learning about biodiversity – both conceptually and in practice – is key to fostering pro-environmental behaviors, yet it is difficult to teach because it spans multiple disciplines and meanings. Augmented reality (AR) can enhance engagement, motivation, and learning, while outdoor experiences are known to strengthen environmental affects. We therefore examined whether location-based AR is more effective than a non-digital resource for biodiversity learning within an analogical-reasoning teaching sequence. In a crossover experiment, 169 French-speaking Swiss pupils (aged 12–17) explored two nature areas containing differentiated content. Each pupil used AR in one area and a paper-based resource in the other; footsteps were measured with pedometers, and pupils completed multiple-choice questionnaires and psychometric scales. Relative to the non-digital condition, location-based AR led to higher theoretical knowledge scores and greater nature exploration (footsteps). However, we observed no significant differences in environmental affects. These findings contribute empirical evidence on AR for biodiversity education that can help educators develop learning activities that meet their pedagogical goals: location-based AR can bolster knowledge and exploration, yet – under the present design – it may not translate into broad affective change. We discuss implications for aligning AR design with motivational scaffolds and nature connectedness goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825002167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825002167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解生物多样性——无论是在概念上还是在实践上——是培养亲环境行为的关键,但是很难教授,因为它跨越了多个学科和意义。增强现实(AR)可以增强参与度、积极性和学习能力,而户外体验则可以增强环境影响。因此,我们研究了在类比推理教学序列中,基于位置的AR是否比非数字资源更有效地用于生物多样性学习。在一项交叉实验中,169名说法语的瑞士学生(12-17岁)探索了两个包含不同内容的自然区域。每个学生在一个区域使用AR,在另一个区域使用纸质资源;学生们用计步器测量他们的脚步,并完成多项选择问卷和心理测量量表。相对于非数字条件,基于位置的AR导致更高的理论知识得分和更多的自然探索(脚步)。然而,我们没有观察到环境影响的显著差异。这些发现为生物多样性教育的AR提供了经验证据,可以帮助教育者开发满足其教学目标的学习活动:基于位置的AR可以增强知识和探索,但在目前的设计下,它可能无法转化为广泛的情感变化。我们讨论了将AR设计与动机支架和自然连接目标对齐的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of augmented reality on biodiversity learning: An experimental study
Learning about biodiversity – both conceptually and in practice – is key to fostering pro-environmental behaviors, yet it is difficult to teach because it spans multiple disciplines and meanings. Augmented reality (AR) can enhance engagement, motivation, and learning, while outdoor experiences are known to strengthen environmental affects. We therefore examined whether location-based AR is more effective than a non-digital resource for biodiversity learning within an analogical-reasoning teaching sequence. In a crossover experiment, 169 French-speaking Swiss pupils (aged 12–17) explored two nature areas containing differentiated content. Each pupil used AR in one area and a paper-based resource in the other; footsteps were measured with pedometers, and pupils completed multiple-choice questionnaires and psychometric scales. Relative to the non-digital condition, location-based AR led to higher theoretical knowledge scores and greater nature exploration (footsteps). However, we observed no significant differences in environmental affects. These findings contribute empirical evidence on AR for biodiversity education that can help educators develop learning activities that meet their pedagogical goals: location-based AR can bolster knowledge and exploration, yet – under the present design – it may not translate into broad affective change. We discuss implications for aligning AR design with motivational scaffolds and nature connectedness goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信