Mona Bassleer , Stijn Schelfhout , Lot Fonteyne , Wouter Duyck , Nicolas Dirix
{"title":"反馈自我效能感在学生反馈参与中的作用","authors":"Mona Bassleer , Stijn Schelfhout , Lot Fonteyne , Wouter Duyck , Nicolas Dirix","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational feedback research is shifting from feedback provision to feedback reception, but more theory-based studies on student feedback engagement are still needed for targeted interventions. In higher education, promoting feedback engagement can streamline study trajectories and reduce fail and dropout rates. This study focused on first-year university students (<em>N</em> = 392) receiving feedback on their program-specific validated academic achievement prediction, based on various background/(non-)cognitive variables, along with remediation and competence training recommendations. Using a Theory of Planned Behavior model, we analyzed students' intentional (IFE) and behavioral (BFE) feedback engagement, as well as their feedback self-efficacy (FSE) and received feedback. Results show IFE positively influences BFE, while FSE positively affects IFE. Feedback indicating a higher chance of study success increases FSE. IFE fully mediates the relationship between FSE and BFE, and FSE between students’ received feedback and IFE. We discuss directing educational interventions towards enhancing FSE to promote student feedback engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of feedback self-efficacy in student feedback engagement\",\"authors\":\"Mona Bassleer , Stijn Schelfhout , Lot Fonteyne , Wouter Duyck , Nicolas Dirix\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Educational feedback research is shifting from feedback provision to feedback reception, but more theory-based studies on student feedback engagement are still needed for targeted interventions. In higher education, promoting feedback engagement can streamline study trajectories and reduce fail and dropout rates. This study focused on first-year university students (<em>N</em> = 392) receiving feedback on their program-specific validated academic achievement prediction, based on various background/(non-)cognitive variables, along with remediation and competence training recommendations. Using a Theory of Planned Behavior model, we analyzed students' intentional (IFE) and behavioral (BFE) feedback engagement, as well as their feedback self-efficacy (FSE) and received feedback. Results show IFE positively influences BFE, while FSE positively affects IFE. Feedback indicating a higher chance of study success increases FSE. IFE fully mediates the relationship between FSE and BFE, and FSE between students’ received feedback and IFE. We discuss directing educational interventions towards enhancing FSE to promote student feedback engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X2500077X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X2500077X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of feedback self-efficacy in student feedback engagement
Educational feedback research is shifting from feedback provision to feedback reception, but more theory-based studies on student feedback engagement are still needed for targeted interventions. In higher education, promoting feedback engagement can streamline study trajectories and reduce fail and dropout rates. This study focused on first-year university students (N = 392) receiving feedback on their program-specific validated academic achievement prediction, based on various background/(non-)cognitive variables, along with remediation and competence training recommendations. Using a Theory of Planned Behavior model, we analyzed students' intentional (IFE) and behavioral (BFE) feedback engagement, as well as their feedback self-efficacy (FSE) and received feedback. Results show IFE positively influences BFE, while FSE positively affects IFE. Feedback indicating a higher chance of study success increases FSE. IFE fully mediates the relationship between FSE and BFE, and FSE between students’ received feedback and IFE. We discuss directing educational interventions towards enhancing FSE to promote student feedback engagement.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.