地下结构抗震弹性评价方法及验证

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yang Fan , Zhuang Haiyang , Yun Long , Wang Dianpeng , Xu Zigang
{"title":"地下结构抗震弹性评价方法及验证","authors":"Yang Fan ,&nbsp;Zhuang Haiyang ,&nbsp;Yun Long ,&nbsp;Wang Dianpeng ,&nbsp;Xu Zigang","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A subway station is a crucial part of a city's subway system, and its recovery following an earthquake can significantly impact the overall resilience of the entire system. However, the post-earthquake repair of underground subway stations is complex, time-consuming, and costly, and the existing seismic resilience evaluation methods based on superstructures cannot be directly applied to underground structures. Therefore, this study builds upon previous fragility research, introducing the economic loss correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>L, i</em></sub> under different seismic performance levels and the recovery time correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> to account for the unique challenges of post-earthquake repair in underground stations. This approach enhances the resilience evaluation method for underground station structures, analyzing the influence of recovery functions and site classifications on their resilience. The results indicated that the revised resilience evaluation method, which accounts for the particularities of economic loss and recovery time, can accurately assess the resilience loss of underground station structures. The correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> should be determined based on the structural form, specifically, <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 1.7 for a one-story, two-span structure, and <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 4.0 for a two-story, three-span structure. Resilience loss is highly dependent on site classification and recovery strategies, with stations located on harder sites exhibiting lower resilience loss. Additionally, stations employing a rapid recovery strategy (exponential recovery) demonstrate reduced resilience loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation method for seismic resilience of underground structures and its verification\",\"authors\":\"Yang Fan ,&nbsp;Zhuang Haiyang ,&nbsp;Yun Long ,&nbsp;Wang Dianpeng ,&nbsp;Xu Zigang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A subway station is a crucial part of a city's subway system, and its recovery following an earthquake can significantly impact the overall resilience of the entire system. However, the post-earthquake repair of underground subway stations is complex, time-consuming, and costly, and the existing seismic resilience evaluation methods based on superstructures cannot be directly applied to underground structures. Therefore, this study builds upon previous fragility research, introducing the economic loss correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>L, i</em></sub> under different seismic performance levels and the recovery time correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> to account for the unique challenges of post-earthquake repair in underground stations. This approach enhances the resilience evaluation method for underground station structures, analyzing the influence of recovery functions and site classifications on their resilience. The results indicated that the revised resilience evaluation method, which accounts for the particularities of economic loss and recovery time, can accurately assess the resilience loss of underground station structures. The correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> should be determined based on the structural form, specifically, <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 1.7 for a one-story, two-span structure, and <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 4.0 for a two-story, three-span structure. Resilience loss is highly dependent on site classification and recovery strategies, with stations located on harder sites exhibiting lower resilience loss. Additionally, stations employing a rapid recovery strategy (exponential recovery) demonstrate reduced resilience loss.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地铁站是城市地铁系统的重要组成部分,它在地震后的恢复会对整个系统的整体恢复能力产生重大影响。然而,地铁地下车站的灾后修复复杂、耗时、成本高,现有的基于上部结构的抗震弹性评价方法不能直接应用于地下结构。因此,本研究在前人脆弱性研究的基础上,引入不同抗震性能水平下的经济损失校正因子λL, i和恢复时间校正因子λt,以考虑地下车站震后修复的独特挑战。该方法对地下车站结构弹性评价方法进行了改进,分析了恢复功能和场地分类对地下车站结构弹性的影响。结果表明,修正后的恢复力评价方法考虑了经济损失和恢复时间的特殊性,能较准确地评价地下车站结构的恢复力损失。修正系数λt应根据结构形式确定,一层两跨结构时λt = 1.7,两层三跨结构时λt = 4.0。弹性损失高度依赖于站点分类和恢复策略,位于较硬站点的站点表现出较低的弹性损失。此外,采用快速恢复策略(指数恢复)的站点显示弹性损失减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation method for seismic resilience of underground structures and its verification
A subway station is a crucial part of a city's subway system, and its recovery following an earthquake can significantly impact the overall resilience of the entire system. However, the post-earthquake repair of underground subway stations is complex, time-consuming, and costly, and the existing seismic resilience evaluation methods based on superstructures cannot be directly applied to underground structures. Therefore, this study builds upon previous fragility research, introducing the economic loss correction factor λL, i under different seismic performance levels and the recovery time correction factor λt to account for the unique challenges of post-earthquake repair in underground stations. This approach enhances the resilience evaluation method for underground station structures, analyzing the influence of recovery functions and site classifications on their resilience. The results indicated that the revised resilience evaluation method, which accounts for the particularities of economic loss and recovery time, can accurately assess the resilience loss of underground station structures. The correction factor λt should be determined based on the structural form, specifically, λt = 1.7 for a one-story, two-span structure, and λt = 4.0 for a two-story, three-span structure. Resilience loss is highly dependent on site classification and recovery strategies, with stations located on harder sites exhibiting lower resilience loss. Additionally, stations employing a rapid recovery strategy (exponential recovery) demonstrate reduced resilience loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信