Yang Fan , Zhuang Haiyang , Yun Long , Wang Dianpeng , Xu Zigang
{"title":"地下结构抗震弹性评价方法及验证","authors":"Yang Fan , Zhuang Haiyang , Yun Long , Wang Dianpeng , Xu Zigang","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A subway station is a crucial part of a city's subway system, and its recovery following an earthquake can significantly impact the overall resilience of the entire system. However, the post-earthquake repair of underground subway stations is complex, time-consuming, and costly, and the existing seismic resilience evaluation methods based on superstructures cannot be directly applied to underground structures. Therefore, this study builds upon previous fragility research, introducing the economic loss correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>L, i</em></sub> under different seismic performance levels and the recovery time correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> to account for the unique challenges of post-earthquake repair in underground stations. This approach enhances the resilience evaluation method for underground station structures, analyzing the influence of recovery functions and site classifications on their resilience. The results indicated that the revised resilience evaluation method, which accounts for the particularities of economic loss and recovery time, can accurately assess the resilience loss of underground station structures. The correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> should be determined based on the structural form, specifically, <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 1.7 for a one-story, two-span structure, and <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 4.0 for a two-story, three-span structure. Resilience loss is highly dependent on site classification and recovery strategies, with stations located on harder sites exhibiting lower resilience loss. Additionally, stations employing a rapid recovery strategy (exponential recovery) demonstrate reduced resilience loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation method for seismic resilience of underground structures and its verification\",\"authors\":\"Yang Fan , Zhuang Haiyang , Yun Long , Wang Dianpeng , Xu Zigang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A subway station is a crucial part of a city's subway system, and its recovery following an earthquake can significantly impact the overall resilience of the entire system. However, the post-earthquake repair of underground subway stations is complex, time-consuming, and costly, and the existing seismic resilience evaluation methods based on superstructures cannot be directly applied to underground structures. Therefore, this study builds upon previous fragility research, introducing the economic loss correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>L, i</em></sub> under different seismic performance levels and the recovery time correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> to account for the unique challenges of post-earthquake repair in underground stations. This approach enhances the resilience evaluation method for underground station structures, analyzing the influence of recovery functions and site classifications on their resilience. The results indicated that the revised resilience evaluation method, which accounts for the particularities of economic loss and recovery time, can accurately assess the resilience loss of underground station structures. The correction factor <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> should be determined based on the structural form, specifically, <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 1.7 for a one-story, two-span structure, and <em>λ</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 4.0 for a two-story, three-span structure. Resilience loss is highly dependent on site classification and recovery strategies, with stations located on harder sites exhibiting lower resilience loss. Additionally, stations employing a rapid recovery strategy (exponential recovery) demonstrate reduced resilience loss.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation method for seismic resilience of underground structures and its verification
A subway station is a crucial part of a city's subway system, and its recovery following an earthquake can significantly impact the overall resilience of the entire system. However, the post-earthquake repair of underground subway stations is complex, time-consuming, and costly, and the existing seismic resilience evaluation methods based on superstructures cannot be directly applied to underground structures. Therefore, this study builds upon previous fragility research, introducing the economic loss correction factor λL, i under different seismic performance levels and the recovery time correction factor λt to account for the unique challenges of post-earthquake repair in underground stations. This approach enhances the resilience evaluation method for underground station structures, analyzing the influence of recovery functions and site classifications on their resilience. The results indicated that the revised resilience evaluation method, which accounts for the particularities of economic loss and recovery time, can accurately assess the resilience loss of underground station structures. The correction factor λt should be determined based on the structural form, specifically, λt = 1.7 for a one-story, two-span structure, and λt = 4.0 for a two-story, three-span structure. Resilience loss is highly dependent on site classification and recovery strategies, with stations located on harder sites exhibiting lower resilience loss. Additionally, stations employing a rapid recovery strategy (exponential recovery) demonstrate reduced resilience loss.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering.
Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.