评价生态红线政策:将多情景土地利用模拟与生态网络分析相结合

IF 3.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Yan Zhang , Xinyi Yin , Yufei Li , Junqing Wei , Haofeng Wang , Peiheng Yu , Yiyun Chen
{"title":"评价生态红线政策:将多情景土地利用模拟与生态网络分析相结合","authors":"Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Yin ,&nbsp;Yufei Li ,&nbsp;Junqing Wei ,&nbsp;Haofeng Wang ,&nbsp;Peiheng Yu ,&nbsp;Yiyun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological redlines (ERLs) are vital for conserving key ecological spaces and maintaining ecosystem connectivity. While existing research has focused primarily on ERLs delineation, less attention has been paid to assessing their impacts. To address this gap, we proposed an innovative framework integrating multi-scenario land use simulation and ecological network analysis to evaluate ERLs policy effectiveness. Using Wuhan as a case study, we simulated land use under four scenarios: business-as-usual (BAU), ecological baseline (EBL), ecological development line (EDL), and ecological redline (ERL). Subsequently, ecological network construction and connectivity analysis were implemented. The results revealed that: (1) ERLs implementation significantly protects cultivated land and curbs urban expansion. (2) Different ERLs vary in effectiveness: The EBL scenario optimizes large-scale ecological source protection; the EDL scenario features the highest number and longest total corridor length; the ERL scenario minimizes the number and area of ecological barrier points. (3) ERLs implementation does not significantly enhance overall network connectivity. (4) Most network indicators under the ERL scenario fall between the EBL and EDL results, demonstrating policy trade-offs in ecological protection. This study provides scientific references for the delineation, evaluation and optimization of ecological policy for sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"510 ","pages":"Article 111357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating ecological redline policies: Integrating multi-scenario land use simulation with ecological network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Yin ,&nbsp;Yufei Li ,&nbsp;Junqing Wei ,&nbsp;Haofeng Wang ,&nbsp;Peiheng Yu ,&nbsp;Yiyun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ecological redlines (ERLs) are vital for conserving key ecological spaces and maintaining ecosystem connectivity. While existing research has focused primarily on ERLs delineation, less attention has been paid to assessing their impacts. To address this gap, we proposed an innovative framework integrating multi-scenario land use simulation and ecological network analysis to evaluate ERLs policy effectiveness. Using Wuhan as a case study, we simulated land use under four scenarios: business-as-usual (BAU), ecological baseline (EBL), ecological development line (EDL), and ecological redline (ERL). Subsequently, ecological network construction and connectivity analysis were implemented. The results revealed that: (1) ERLs implementation significantly protects cultivated land and curbs urban expansion. (2) Different ERLs vary in effectiveness: The EBL scenario optimizes large-scale ecological source protection; the EDL scenario features the highest number and longest total corridor length; the ERL scenario minimizes the number and area of ecological barrier points. (3) ERLs implementation does not significantly enhance overall network connectivity. (4) Most network indicators under the ERL scenario fall between the EBL and EDL results, demonstrating policy trade-offs in ecological protection. This study provides scientific references for the delineation, evaluation and optimization of ecological policy for sustainable development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"510 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003436\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025003436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态红线对于保护关键生态空间和维持生态系统连通性至关重要。虽然现有的研究主要集中在erl的描述上,但对评估其影响的关注较少。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了一个整合多场景土地利用模拟和生态网络分析的创新框架来评估ERLs政策的有效性。以武汉市为例,模拟了四种情景下的土地利用:照常经营(BAU)、生态基线(EBL)、生态发展线(EDL)和生态红线(ERL)。随后进行生态网络构建和连通性分析。结果表明:(1)实施ERLs对耕地保护和城市扩张具有显著的抑制作用。(2)不同erl的有效性存在差异:EBL情景优化了大规模的生态资源保护;EDL情景的走廊数量最多,总长度最长;ERL情景使生态屏障点的数量和面积最小化。(3) ERLs的实施并未显著提升整体网络连通性。(4) ERL情景下大多数网络指标介于EBL和EDL结果之间,体现了生态保护的政策权衡。该研究为可持续发展生态政策的划定、评价和优化提供了科学参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating ecological redline policies: Integrating multi-scenario land use simulation with ecological network analysis
Ecological redlines (ERLs) are vital for conserving key ecological spaces and maintaining ecosystem connectivity. While existing research has focused primarily on ERLs delineation, less attention has been paid to assessing their impacts. To address this gap, we proposed an innovative framework integrating multi-scenario land use simulation and ecological network analysis to evaluate ERLs policy effectiveness. Using Wuhan as a case study, we simulated land use under four scenarios: business-as-usual (BAU), ecological baseline (EBL), ecological development line (EDL), and ecological redline (ERL). Subsequently, ecological network construction and connectivity analysis were implemented. The results revealed that: (1) ERLs implementation significantly protects cultivated land and curbs urban expansion. (2) Different ERLs vary in effectiveness: The EBL scenario optimizes large-scale ecological source protection; the EDL scenario features the highest number and longest total corridor length; the ERL scenario minimizes the number and area of ecological barrier points. (3) ERLs implementation does not significantly enhance overall network connectivity. (4) Most network indicators under the ERL scenario fall between the EBL and EDL results, demonstrating policy trade-offs in ecological protection. This study provides scientific references for the delineation, evaluation and optimization of ecological policy for sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信