学习生态与创造力:基于利益相关者和学习者参与的开放学校项目类型

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Tasos Hovardas , Kyriaki Vakkou , Konstantina Arampatzi , Zacharias Zacharia , Evita Tasiopoulou , Agueda Gras-Velazquez , Georgios Mavromanolakis , Vasilis Liakopoulos , Pavlos Koulouris , Sofoklis Sotiriou , Stephanos Cherouvis , Katarina Stekić , Cristina Veiga Pires , Patricia Barella , Mary Deely , Laura Mentini , Eleni Chatzidaki , Michail Giannakos , Ruediger Tiemann , Melissa Horchemer , Mario Muscat
{"title":"学习生态与创造力:基于利益相关者和学习者参与的开放学校项目类型","authors":"Tasos Hovardas ,&nbsp;Kyriaki Vakkou ,&nbsp;Konstantina Arampatzi ,&nbsp;Zacharias Zacharia ,&nbsp;Evita Tasiopoulou ,&nbsp;Agueda Gras-Velazquez ,&nbsp;Georgios Mavromanolakis ,&nbsp;Vasilis Liakopoulos ,&nbsp;Pavlos Koulouris ,&nbsp;Sofoklis Sotiriou ,&nbsp;Stephanos Cherouvis ,&nbsp;Katarina Stekić ,&nbsp;Cristina Veiga Pires ,&nbsp;Patricia Barella ,&nbsp;Mary Deely ,&nbsp;Laura Mentini ,&nbsp;Eleni Chatzidaki ,&nbsp;Michail Giannakos ,&nbsp;Ruediger Tiemann ,&nbsp;Melissa Horchemer ,&nbsp;Mario Muscat","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the considerable funding of open schooling projects from the EU, relevant publications have been scarce. We present an analysis of open schooling initiatives launched within the frame of the STE(A)M Learning Ecologies – SLEs Project. SLEs offer opportunities to promote creativity of both learners and stakeholders engaged through innovative pedagogical design and the delivery of original learning artefacts (learning products). We gathered and analyzed several forms of data reflecting learner and stakeholder engagement associated with these initiatives. They included two templates completed with stakeholder input (participatory pedagogical design template; participatory scenario development template), learning products delivered by students in each SLE, interviews with stakeholders and responses to open-ended questionnaire items. Our data analysis revealed four types of SLEs: (1) Learner-experience oriented, (2) Master-product oriented, (3) End-user oriented, and (4) Citizen-science oriented.</div><div>We present similarities and differences of the various types of SLE with regard to stakeholder synthesis (diversity), learning objectives, female participation, career opportunities, their potential for transformative change, challenges encountered, and sustainability aspects. Based on the typology of SLEs and their characteristics, we identified a series of recommendations for future research and policy to optimize investment in and impact of open schooling projects. These include a focus on small wins to scale up SLEs, distributed leadership to empower teachers and increase availability of learning resources and learner support, and using learning products to decentralize formative assessment in SLEs and promote constructive stakeholder dialogue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102012"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STE(A)M Learning Ecologies and creativity: A typology of open schooling projects based on stakeholder and learner engagement\",\"authors\":\"Tasos Hovardas ,&nbsp;Kyriaki Vakkou ,&nbsp;Konstantina Arampatzi ,&nbsp;Zacharias Zacharia ,&nbsp;Evita Tasiopoulou ,&nbsp;Agueda Gras-Velazquez ,&nbsp;Georgios Mavromanolakis ,&nbsp;Vasilis Liakopoulos ,&nbsp;Pavlos Koulouris ,&nbsp;Sofoklis Sotiriou ,&nbsp;Stephanos Cherouvis ,&nbsp;Katarina Stekić ,&nbsp;Cristina Veiga Pires ,&nbsp;Patricia Barella ,&nbsp;Mary Deely ,&nbsp;Laura Mentini ,&nbsp;Eleni Chatzidaki ,&nbsp;Michail Giannakos ,&nbsp;Ruediger Tiemann ,&nbsp;Melissa Horchemer ,&nbsp;Mario Muscat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the considerable funding of open schooling projects from the EU, relevant publications have been scarce. We present an analysis of open schooling initiatives launched within the frame of the STE(A)M Learning Ecologies – SLEs Project. SLEs offer opportunities to promote creativity of both learners and stakeholders engaged through innovative pedagogical design and the delivery of original learning artefacts (learning products). We gathered and analyzed several forms of data reflecting learner and stakeholder engagement associated with these initiatives. They included two templates completed with stakeholder input (participatory pedagogical design template; participatory scenario development template), learning products delivered by students in each SLE, interviews with stakeholders and responses to open-ended questionnaire items. Our data analysis revealed four types of SLEs: (1) Learner-experience oriented, (2) Master-product oriented, (3) End-user oriented, and (4) Citizen-science oriented.</div><div>We present similarities and differences of the various types of SLE with regard to stakeholder synthesis (diversity), learning objectives, female participation, career opportunities, their potential for transformative change, challenges encountered, and sustainability aspects. Based on the typology of SLEs and their characteristics, we identified a series of recommendations for future research and policy to optimize investment in and impact of open schooling projects. These include a focus on small wins to scale up SLEs, distributed leadership to empower teachers and increase availability of learning resources and learner support, and using learning products to decentralize formative assessment in SLEs and promote constructive stakeholder dialogue.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125002603\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125002603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管欧盟为开放学校项目提供了大量资金,但相关的出版物却很少。我们对STE(A)M学习生态- SLEs项目框架内启动的开放学校计划进行了分析。SLEs通过创新的教学设计和原创学习产品(学习产品)的交付,为学习者和利益相关者提供了促进创造力的机会。我们收集并分析了几种形式的数据,反映了与这些计划相关的学习者和利益相关者的参与情况。它们包括两个由利益相关者输入完成的模板(参与式教学设计模板;参与式情景开发模板)、每个SLE中学生交付的学习产品、与利益相关者的访谈以及对开放式问卷项目的回答。我们的数据分析显示了四种类型的SLEs:(1)以学习者体验为导向,(2)以主产品为导向,(3)以终端用户为导向,(4)以公民科学为导向。我们在利益相关者综合(多样性)、学习目标、女性参与、职业机会、变革潜力、遇到的挑战和可持续性方面展示了不同类型SLE的异同。基于SLEs的类型及其特征,我们为未来的研究和政策提出了一系列建议,以优化开放学校项目的投资和影响。这些措施包括:注重小胜利,扩大SLEs的规模;分布式领导,赋予教师权力,增加学习资源的可用性和对学习者的支持;使用学习产品,分散SLEs中的形成性评估,促进建设性的利益相关者对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STE(A)M Learning Ecologies and creativity: A typology of open schooling projects based on stakeholder and learner engagement
Despite the considerable funding of open schooling projects from the EU, relevant publications have been scarce. We present an analysis of open schooling initiatives launched within the frame of the STE(A)M Learning Ecologies – SLEs Project. SLEs offer opportunities to promote creativity of both learners and stakeholders engaged through innovative pedagogical design and the delivery of original learning artefacts (learning products). We gathered and analyzed several forms of data reflecting learner and stakeholder engagement associated with these initiatives. They included two templates completed with stakeholder input (participatory pedagogical design template; participatory scenario development template), learning products delivered by students in each SLE, interviews with stakeholders and responses to open-ended questionnaire items. Our data analysis revealed four types of SLEs: (1) Learner-experience oriented, (2) Master-product oriented, (3) End-user oriented, and (4) Citizen-science oriented.
We present similarities and differences of the various types of SLE with regard to stakeholder synthesis (diversity), learning objectives, female participation, career opportunities, their potential for transformative change, challenges encountered, and sustainability aspects. Based on the typology of SLEs and their characteristics, we identified a series of recommendations for future research and policy to optimize investment in and impact of open schooling projects. These include a focus on small wins to scale up SLEs, distributed leadership to empower teachers and increase availability of learning resources and learner support, and using learning products to decentralize formative assessment in SLEs and promote constructive stakeholder dialogue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信