具有定性或半定量数据的常微分方程模型的可辨识性和不确定性

IF 2.2 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Domagoj Dorešić , Dilan Pathirana , Daniel Weindl , Jan Hasenauer
{"title":"具有定性或半定量数据的常微分方程模型的可辨识性和不确定性","authors":"Domagoj Dorešić ,&nbsp;Dilan Pathirana ,&nbsp;Daniel Weindl ,&nbsp;Jan Hasenauer","doi":"10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The estimation of unknown parameters is a key step in the development of mechanistic dynamical models for biological processes. While quantitative measurements are typically used for model calibration, in many applications, only semiquantitative or qualitative observations are available, posing unique challenges for parameter estimation.</div><div>Specialized approaches have been developed to integrate such data, offering trade-offs in bias, flexibility, and computational efficiency. Most of these approaches involve a recording function that maps the quantitative model onto nonabsolute data; however, this introduces additional degrees of freedom that can contribute to non-identifiability. Reliable calibration therefore requires structural and practical identifiability analysis, alongside robust uncertainty quantification.</div><div>In this work, we provide an overview of available methods, critically examine them with respect to identifiability and uncertainty considerations, identify methodological gaps, outline strategies to improve computational efficiency, and advocate for the development of standardized benchmarking frameworks to support informed method selection and best practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37400,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifiability and uncertainty for ordinary differential equation models with qualitative or semiquantitative data\",\"authors\":\"Domagoj Dorešić ,&nbsp;Dilan Pathirana ,&nbsp;Daniel Weindl ,&nbsp;Jan Hasenauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The estimation of unknown parameters is a key step in the development of mechanistic dynamical models for biological processes. While quantitative measurements are typically used for model calibration, in many applications, only semiquantitative or qualitative observations are available, posing unique challenges for parameter estimation.</div><div>Specialized approaches have been developed to integrate such data, offering trade-offs in bias, flexibility, and computational efficiency. Most of these approaches involve a recording function that maps the quantitative model onto nonabsolute data; however, this introduces additional degrees of freedom that can contribute to non-identifiability. Reliable calibration therefore requires structural and practical identifiability analysis, alongside robust uncertainty quantification.</div><div>In this work, we provide an overview of available methods, critically examine them with respect to identifiability and uncertainty considerations, identify methodological gaps, outline strategies to improve computational efficiency, and advocate for the development of standardized benchmarking frameworks to support informed method selection and best practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Systems Biology\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Systems Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310025000186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310025000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未知参数的估计是建立生物过程动力学模型的关键步骤。虽然定量测量通常用于模型校准,但在许多应用中,只能获得半定量或定性观测,这对参数估计提出了独特的挑战。已经开发出专门的方法来集成这些数据,在偏差、灵活性和计算效率方面提供折衷。这些方法大多涉及一个记录功能,将定量模型映射到非绝对数据;然而,这引入了额外的自由度,可能导致不可识别性。因此,可靠的校准需要结构和实际的可识别性分析,以及稳健的不确定度量化。在这项工作中,我们概述了可用方法,根据可识别性和不确定性因素对其进行批判性检查,确定方法差距,概述提高计算效率的策略,并倡导开发标准化基准框架,以支持明智的方法选择和最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifiability and uncertainty for ordinary differential equation models with qualitative or semiquantitative data

Identifiability and uncertainty for ordinary differential equation models with qualitative or semiquantitative data
The estimation of unknown parameters is a key step in the development of mechanistic dynamical models for biological processes. While quantitative measurements are typically used for model calibration, in many applications, only semiquantitative or qualitative observations are available, posing unique challenges for parameter estimation.
Specialized approaches have been developed to integrate such data, offering trade-offs in bias, flexibility, and computational efficiency. Most of these approaches involve a recording function that maps the quantitative model onto nonabsolute data; however, this introduces additional degrees of freedom that can contribute to non-identifiability. Reliable calibration therefore requires structural and practical identifiability analysis, alongside robust uncertainty quantification.
In this work, we provide an overview of available methods, critically examine them with respect to identifiability and uncertainty considerations, identify methodological gaps, outline strategies to improve computational efficiency, and advocate for the development of standardized benchmarking frameworks to support informed method selection and best practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Systems Biology
Current Opinion in Systems Biology Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Systems Biology is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up-to-date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Systems Biology. It publishes polished, concise and timely systematic reviews and opinion articles. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion on the topics discussed. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year. The following areas will be covered by Current Opinion in Systems Biology: -Genomics and Epigenomics -Gene Regulation -Metabolic Networks -Cancer and Systemic Diseases -Mathematical Modelling -Big Data Acquisition and Analysis -Systems Pharmacology and Physiology -Synthetic Biology -Stem Cells, Development, and Differentiation -Systems Biology of Mold Organisms -Systems Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interaction -Systems Ecology and Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信