小行星带的枯竭和地球的撞击史

IF 3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Julio A. Fernández
{"title":"小行星带的枯竭和地球的撞击史","authors":"Julio A. Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We have evaluated the rate at which the asteroid belt is losing material, and how it splits between macroscopic bodies and meteoritic dust. The mass loss process is due to the injection of asteroid fragments into unstable dynamical regions, associated to mean-motion resonances with Jupiter, Saturn and Mars or secular resonances, from where they are scattered either to the region of the terrestrial planets or to the vicinity of Jupiter’s orbit. Asteroid fragments that do not escape from the belt are ground down by mutual collisions to meteoritic dust. Under the assumption that 25% of the zodiacal dust mass is of asteroidal origin, we find that the asteroid belt is currently losing a fraction of about <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>o</mi></mrow></msub><mo>≃</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> Ma<sup>−1</sup> of its collisionally-active mass (without the primordial objects Ceres, Vesta and Pallas), about 20% as macroscopic bodies, and 80% as dust particles that feed the zodiacal dust cloud. Extrapolation of the current mass loss rate to the past suggests only a moderate increase of the asteroid belt mass and the mass loss rate around 3.0−3.5 Ga ago (by about 50% and a factor of two respectively). Yet, should the computed <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>o</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> be somewhat underestimated owing to the different uncertainties associated to its computation, the extrapolation to the past would lead to quite different results. For instance, a moderate increase in the computed <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>o</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, say by a factor of three, would lead to an exponential increase of the asteroid mass and mass loss rate about 3.5 Ga ago. A greater asteroid mass loss rate in the past should be correlated with a more intense impact rate of the Earth, Moon and the other terrestrial planets, which is indeed what suggests the geologic record (Hartmann et al., 2007).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13199,"journal":{"name":"Icarus","volume":"445 ","pages":"Article 116824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The depletion of the asteroid belt and the impact history of the Earth\",\"authors\":\"Julio A. Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We have evaluated the rate at which the asteroid belt is losing material, and how it splits between macroscopic bodies and meteoritic dust. The mass loss process is due to the injection of asteroid fragments into unstable dynamical regions, associated to mean-motion resonances with Jupiter, Saturn and Mars or secular resonances, from where they are scattered either to the region of the terrestrial planets or to the vicinity of Jupiter’s orbit. Asteroid fragments that do not escape from the belt are ground down by mutual collisions to meteoritic dust. Under the assumption that 25% of the zodiacal dust mass is of asteroidal origin, we find that the asteroid belt is currently losing a fraction of about <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>o</mi></mrow></msub><mo>≃</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><msup><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> Ma<sup>−1</sup> of its collisionally-active mass (without the primordial objects Ceres, Vesta and Pallas), about 20% as macroscopic bodies, and 80% as dust particles that feed the zodiacal dust cloud. Extrapolation of the current mass loss rate to the past suggests only a moderate increase of the asteroid belt mass and the mass loss rate around 3.0−3.5 Ga ago (by about 50% and a factor of two respectively). Yet, should the computed <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>o</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> be somewhat underestimated owing to the different uncertainties associated to its computation, the extrapolation to the past would lead to quite different results. For instance, a moderate increase in the computed <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>o</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, say by a factor of three, would lead to an exponential increase of the asteroid mass and mass loss rate about 3.5 Ga ago. A greater asteroid mass loss rate in the past should be correlated with a more intense impact rate of the Earth, Moon and the other terrestrial planets, which is indeed what suggests the geologic record (Hartmann et al., 2007).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Icarus\",\"volume\":\"445 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Icarus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103525003720\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icarus","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103525003720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们已经评估了小行星带失去物质的速度,以及它是如何在宏观天体和陨石尘埃之间分裂的。质量损失的过程是由于小行星碎片注入不稳定的动力区域,与木星、土星和火星的平均运动共振或长期共振有关,从那里它们被分散到类地行星区域或木星轨道附近。没有从带中逃脱的小行星碎片通过相互碰撞被磨成陨石尘埃。假设黄道带尘埃质量的25%来自小行星,我们发现小行星带目前损失了大约μo≃8.8×10−5 Ma−1的碰撞活跃质量(不包括谷神星、灶神星和神神星),大约20%为宏观天体,80%为黄道带尘埃云的尘埃颗粒。将目前的质量损失率外推到过去表明,小行星带的质量和质量损失率在3.0 - 3.5 Ga以前只有适度的增加(分别约为50%和两倍)。然而,如果计算的μo由于与其计算相关的不同的不确定性而有所低估,那么对过去的外推将导致完全不同的结果。例如,计算得到的μo适度增加,比如增加三倍,将导致大约3.5亿年前小行星的质量和质量损失率呈指数增长。过去小行星的质量损失率越高,对地球、月球和其他类地行星的撞击率就越高,这确实是地质记录所表明的(Hartmann et al., 2007)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The depletion of the asteroid belt and the impact history of the Earth
We have evaluated the rate at which the asteroid belt is losing material, and how it splits between macroscopic bodies and meteoritic dust. The mass loss process is due to the injection of asteroid fragments into unstable dynamical regions, associated to mean-motion resonances with Jupiter, Saturn and Mars or secular resonances, from where they are scattered either to the region of the terrestrial planets or to the vicinity of Jupiter’s orbit. Asteroid fragments that do not escape from the belt are ground down by mutual collisions to meteoritic dust. Under the assumption that 25% of the zodiacal dust mass is of asteroidal origin, we find that the asteroid belt is currently losing a fraction of about μo8.8×105 Ma−1 of its collisionally-active mass (without the primordial objects Ceres, Vesta and Pallas), about 20% as macroscopic bodies, and 80% as dust particles that feed the zodiacal dust cloud. Extrapolation of the current mass loss rate to the past suggests only a moderate increase of the asteroid belt mass and the mass loss rate around 3.0−3.5 Ga ago (by about 50% and a factor of two respectively). Yet, should the computed μo be somewhat underestimated owing to the different uncertainties associated to its computation, the extrapolation to the past would lead to quite different results. For instance, a moderate increase in the computed μo, say by a factor of three, would lead to an exponential increase of the asteroid mass and mass loss rate about 3.5 Ga ago. A greater asteroid mass loss rate in the past should be correlated with a more intense impact rate of the Earth, Moon and the other terrestrial planets, which is indeed what suggests the geologic record (Hartmann et al., 2007).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Icarus
Icarus 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
356
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Icarus is devoted to the publication of original contributions in the field of Solar System studies. Manuscripts reporting the results of new research - observational, experimental, or theoretical - concerning the astronomy, geology, meteorology, physics, chemistry, biology, and other scientific aspects of our Solar System or extrasolar systems are welcome. The journal generally does not publish papers devoted exclusively to the Sun, the Earth, celestial mechanics, meteoritics, or astrophysics. Icarus does not publish papers that provide "improved" versions of Bode''s law, or other numerical relations, without a sound physical basis. Icarus does not publish meeting announcements or general notices. Reviews, historical papers, and manuscripts describing spacecraft instrumentation may be considered, but only with prior approval of the editor. An entire issue of the journal is occasionally devoted to a single subject, usually arising from a conference on the same topic. The language of publication is English. American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信