华盛顿特区机动车碰撞伤害的趋势和差异

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Ryan S.D. Calder , Claire Summa , Rachel Clark
{"title":"华盛顿特区机动车碰撞伤害的趋势和差异","authors":"Ryan S.D. Calder ,&nbsp;Claire Summa ,&nbsp;Rachel Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nonfatal traffic injuries are ~40 times more frequent than traffic fatalities in the United States, but little is known about racial or ethnic disparities in injury-only collisions because commonly used databases report racial/ethnic data only for fatalities. Crash data from police departments (e.g., Vision Zero) are subject to error and bias arising from changing patterns of police intervention and increased use of alternative or automated traffic enforcement. Here, we leverage Trauma Registry data to quantify racial/ethnic, temporal, and spatial patterns of trauma injuries from motor vehicle collisions among adults in Washington, D.C. and compare results to the commonly used Vision Zero database. We report results by year (2019–2023), road user type (motorists, pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users), and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) to identify primary contributors to total injury rates and racial/ethnic disparities. Between 2019 and 2023, the overall incidence rate (IR) rose from 69 to 132 per 100,000 persons per year and increased among all road user types and races/ethnicities. Compared to white people, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was ≥4.3 among Black/African American people and ≥2.9 among Hispanic/Latino people. The IRR between Black/African American vs. white motorists is ≥9.9. Disparities were observed across 21 of 26 ZCTAs, revealing that disparities cannot be explained by solely by higher minority populations in ZCTAs with more hazardous infrastructure. The commonly used Vision Zero dashboard suggests a downward trend in injury-only crashes, but our analysis suggests that this trend is the result of a bias from reduced police intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108243"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends and disparities in motor vehicle collision injuries in Washington, DC\",\"authors\":\"Ryan S.D. Calder ,&nbsp;Claire Summa ,&nbsp;Rachel Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nonfatal traffic injuries are ~40 times more frequent than traffic fatalities in the United States, but little is known about racial or ethnic disparities in injury-only collisions because commonly used databases report racial/ethnic data only for fatalities. Crash data from police departments (e.g., Vision Zero) are subject to error and bias arising from changing patterns of police intervention and increased use of alternative or automated traffic enforcement. Here, we leverage Trauma Registry data to quantify racial/ethnic, temporal, and spatial patterns of trauma injuries from motor vehicle collisions among adults in Washington, D.C. and compare results to the commonly used Vision Zero database. We report results by year (2019–2023), road user type (motorists, pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users), and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) to identify primary contributors to total injury rates and racial/ethnic disparities. Between 2019 and 2023, the overall incidence rate (IR) rose from 69 to 132 per 100,000 persons per year and increased among all road user types and races/ethnicities. Compared to white people, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was ≥4.3 among Black/African American people and ≥2.9 among Hispanic/Latino people. The IRR between Black/African American vs. white motorists is ≥9.9. Disparities were observed across 21 of 26 ZCTAs, revealing that disparities cannot be explained by solely by higher minority populations in ZCTAs with more hazardous infrastructure. The commonly used Vision Zero dashboard suggests a downward trend in injury-only crashes, but our analysis suggests that this trend is the result of a bias from reduced police intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003318\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,非致命交通伤害的发生率是交通死亡事故的40倍,但由于通常使用的数据库只报告死亡事故的种族/民族数据,因此对仅伤害事故的种族或民族差异知之甚少。来自警察部门(例如Vision Zero)的碰撞数据可能会因警察干预模式的改变和替代或自动化交通执法的增加而产生错误和偏见。在这里,我们利用创伤登记处的数据来量化华盛顿特区成年人机动车碰撞造成的创伤的种族/民族、时间和空间模式,并将结果与常用的Vision Zero数据库进行比较。我们按年度(2019-2023)、道路使用者类型(驾车者、行人、骑自行车者和其他弱势道路使用者)和邮政编码制表区域(ZCTA)报告结果,以确定造成总伤害率和种族/民族差异的主要因素。在2019年至2023年期间,总发病率(IR)从每年每10万人69人上升到132人,所有道路使用者类型和种族/族裔都有所增加。与白人相比,黑人/非裔美国人的发病率比(IRR)≥4.3,西班牙裔/拉丁裔人的发病率比≥2.9。黑人/非裔美国人与白人驾驶者之间的IRR≥9.9。在26个zcta中,有21个观察到差异,表明差异不能仅仅用具有更危险基础设施的zcta中少数民族人口较多来解释。常用的Vision Zero仪表盘显示,仅造成伤害的撞车事故呈下降趋势,但我们的分析表明,这种趋势是警察干预减少的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends and disparities in motor vehicle collision injuries in Washington, DC
Nonfatal traffic injuries are ~40 times more frequent than traffic fatalities in the United States, but little is known about racial or ethnic disparities in injury-only collisions because commonly used databases report racial/ethnic data only for fatalities. Crash data from police departments (e.g., Vision Zero) are subject to error and bias arising from changing patterns of police intervention and increased use of alternative or automated traffic enforcement. Here, we leverage Trauma Registry data to quantify racial/ethnic, temporal, and spatial patterns of trauma injuries from motor vehicle collisions among adults in Washington, D.C. and compare results to the commonly used Vision Zero database. We report results by year (2019–2023), road user type (motorists, pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users), and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) to identify primary contributors to total injury rates and racial/ethnic disparities. Between 2019 and 2023, the overall incidence rate (IR) rose from 69 to 132 per 100,000 persons per year and increased among all road user types and races/ethnicities. Compared to white people, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was ≥4.3 among Black/African American people and ≥2.9 among Hispanic/Latino people. The IRR between Black/African American vs. white motorists is ≥9.9. Disparities were observed across 21 of 26 ZCTAs, revealing that disparities cannot be explained by solely by higher minority populations in ZCTAs with more hazardous infrastructure. The commonly used Vision Zero dashboard suggests a downward trend in injury-only crashes, but our analysis suggests that this trend is the result of a bias from reduced police intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信