{"title":"不注意阴影下的定价:住宅太阳能电价产消不注意的信息论模型","authors":"Sreelatha Aihloor Subramanyam, Xuewei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2025.107503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As distributed solar energy reshapes the dynamics of residential electricity markets, traditional pricing mechanisms are increasingly strained by behavioral realities on the ground. This article advances the field by integrating prosumer inattentiveness, a factor too often omitted from prevailing models, into a unified pricing framework grounded in information theory. Drawing on Shannon’s entropy to represent bounded attention, the paper present a generalized model that evaluates the welfare, prosumers’ utility and electric company’s profitability outcomes of three widely used solar tariffs: Feed-in Tariff (FIT), Net Metering (Net M), and Net Purchase and Sale (Net P&S). The findings are analytically rigorous and empirically validated using real-world data from Texas, revealing that behavioral frictions materially affect tariff performance. In particular, Net M and Net P&S outperform FIT in terms of social welfare under finite attention, while FIT offers greater revenue stability for electrical retail companies. These insights are timely and policy relevant, underscoring the imperative to align solar pricing strategies with actual user behavior. For regulators, electrical retail companies, and scholars alike, this work makes a compelling case for incorporating behavioral economics into energy tariff design. This is a necessary step toward achieving equitable, efficient, and resilient energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 107503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing in the shadows of inattention: An information-theoretic model of prosumer inattention in residential solar tariff\",\"authors\":\"Sreelatha Aihloor Subramanyam, Xuewei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tej.2025.107503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As distributed solar energy reshapes the dynamics of residential electricity markets, traditional pricing mechanisms are increasingly strained by behavioral realities on the ground. This article advances the field by integrating prosumer inattentiveness, a factor too often omitted from prevailing models, into a unified pricing framework grounded in information theory. Drawing on Shannon’s entropy to represent bounded attention, the paper present a generalized model that evaluates the welfare, prosumers’ utility and electric company’s profitability outcomes of three widely used solar tariffs: Feed-in Tariff (FIT), Net Metering (Net M), and Net Purchase and Sale (Net P&S). The findings are analytically rigorous and empirically validated using real-world data from Texas, revealing that behavioral frictions materially affect tariff performance. In particular, Net M and Net P&S outperform FIT in terms of social welfare under finite attention, while FIT offers greater revenue stability for electrical retail companies. These insights are timely and policy relevant, underscoring the imperative to align solar pricing strategies with actual user behavior. For regulators, electrical retail companies, and scholars alike, this work makes a compelling case for incorporating behavioral economics into energy tariff design. This is a necessary step toward achieving equitable, efficient, and resilient energy transitions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 107503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electricity Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104061902500048X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104061902500048X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pricing in the shadows of inattention: An information-theoretic model of prosumer inattention in residential solar tariff
As distributed solar energy reshapes the dynamics of residential electricity markets, traditional pricing mechanisms are increasingly strained by behavioral realities on the ground. This article advances the field by integrating prosumer inattentiveness, a factor too often omitted from prevailing models, into a unified pricing framework grounded in information theory. Drawing on Shannon’s entropy to represent bounded attention, the paper present a generalized model that evaluates the welfare, prosumers’ utility and electric company’s profitability outcomes of three widely used solar tariffs: Feed-in Tariff (FIT), Net Metering (Net M), and Net Purchase and Sale (Net P&S). The findings are analytically rigorous and empirically validated using real-world data from Texas, revealing that behavioral frictions materially affect tariff performance. In particular, Net M and Net P&S outperform FIT in terms of social welfare under finite attention, while FIT offers greater revenue stability for electrical retail companies. These insights are timely and policy relevant, underscoring the imperative to align solar pricing strategies with actual user behavior. For regulators, electrical retail companies, and scholars alike, this work makes a compelling case for incorporating behavioral economics into energy tariff design. This is a necessary step toward achieving equitable, efficient, and resilient energy transitions.
Electricity JournalBusiness, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍:
The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.