层状结晶固体的体尺度应力-应变迟滞:石墨和Ti3SiC2的研究

IF 11.6 2区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
A.G. Westra , E.R. Pittman , M. De Graef , X. Zhao , M.W. Barsoum , L.E. Lamberson
{"title":"层状结晶固体的体尺度应力-应变迟滞:石墨和Ti3SiC2的研究","authors":"A.G. Westra ,&nbsp;E.R. Pittman ,&nbsp;M. De Graef ,&nbsp;X. Zhao ,&nbsp;M.W. Barsoum ,&nbsp;L.E. Lamberson","doi":"10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polycrystalline graphite and the MAX phase Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> are layered crystalline solids with similar deformation mechanisms, including basal slip, ripplocation boundaries (RBs), kink boundaries (KBs), and cracking. The interplay of these mechanisms, notably in energy dissipation, has been much discussed in the past twenty-five years. This study builds upon previous work, investigating deformation with a renewed emphasis on the bulk-scale and given recent findings concerning RBs. Our investigation compares the evolution of energy dissipation, nonlinear recoverable and irrecoverable strain, and damage upon increasing stress for graphite and Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. Benitez et al.’s (2016) methodology of compressive cyclic loading and post-mortem electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to assess the prevalence of kinking based on low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) was used. Strains were measured with digital image correlation and EBSD was conducted on Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> leveraging dictionary indexing, which was necessary herein to identify LAGBs accurately. The stress–strain stages of Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> agree with literature on Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>AlC. Damage and energy dissipation were more accelerated in graphite. No significant difference was observed in the fraction of LAGBs between pristine and unloaded Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. Trends observed and EBSD evidence that KBs were not dominant suggest that RBs are the primary dissipator of energy in both materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":262,"journal":{"name":"Carbon","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 120829"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bulk-scale stress–strain hysteresis in layered crystalline solids: A study of graphite and Ti3SiC2\",\"authors\":\"A.G. Westra ,&nbsp;E.R. Pittman ,&nbsp;M. De Graef ,&nbsp;X. Zhao ,&nbsp;M.W. Barsoum ,&nbsp;L.E. Lamberson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Polycrystalline graphite and the MAX phase Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> are layered crystalline solids with similar deformation mechanisms, including basal slip, ripplocation boundaries (RBs), kink boundaries (KBs), and cracking. The interplay of these mechanisms, notably in energy dissipation, has been much discussed in the past twenty-five years. This study builds upon previous work, investigating deformation with a renewed emphasis on the bulk-scale and given recent findings concerning RBs. Our investigation compares the evolution of energy dissipation, nonlinear recoverable and irrecoverable strain, and damage upon increasing stress for graphite and Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. Benitez et al.’s (2016) methodology of compressive cyclic loading and post-mortem electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to assess the prevalence of kinking based on low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) was used. Strains were measured with digital image correlation and EBSD was conducted on Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> leveraging dictionary indexing, which was necessary herein to identify LAGBs accurately. The stress–strain stages of Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> agree with literature on Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>AlC. Damage and energy dissipation were more accelerated in graphite. No significant difference was observed in the fraction of LAGBs between pristine and unloaded Ti<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>SiC<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. Trends observed and EBSD evidence that KBs were not dominant suggest that RBs are the primary dissipator of energy in both materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon\",\"volume\":\"246 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622325008450\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622325008450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多晶石墨和MAX相Ti3SiC2是层状结晶固体,具有相似的变形机制,包括基底滑移、波纹边界(RBs)、扭结边界(KBs)和开裂。这些机制的相互作用,特别是在能量耗散方面,在过去的25年里已经被讨论了很多。本研究建立在以前的工作基础上,研究变形,重新强调体积规模,并给出有关RBs的最新发现。本研究比较了石墨和Ti3SiC2的能量耗散、非线性可恢复应变和不可恢复应变以及应力增加时损伤的演变。Benitez等人(2016)的压缩循环加载和死后电子背散射衍射(EBSD)方法被用于评估基于低角度晶界(LAGBs)的扭结的流行程度。利用数字图像相关测量菌株,利用字典索引对Ti3SiC2进行EBSD,这是准确识别lagb所必需的。Ti3SiC2的应力-应变阶段与有关Ti2AlC的文献一致。在石墨中,损伤和能量耗散更快。未加载的Ti3SiC2和未加载的Ti3SiC2之间LAGBs的比例没有显著差异。观察到的趋势和EBSD证据表明,KBs不占主导地位,表明RBs是两种材料中主要的能量耗散体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bulk-scale stress–strain hysteresis in layered crystalline solids: A study of graphite and Ti3SiC2

Bulk-scale stress–strain hysteresis in layered crystalline solids: A study of graphite and Ti3SiC2
Polycrystalline graphite and the MAX phase Ti3SiC2 are layered crystalline solids with similar deformation mechanisms, including basal slip, ripplocation boundaries (RBs), kink boundaries (KBs), and cracking. The interplay of these mechanisms, notably in energy dissipation, has been much discussed in the past twenty-five years. This study builds upon previous work, investigating deformation with a renewed emphasis on the bulk-scale and given recent findings concerning RBs. Our investigation compares the evolution of energy dissipation, nonlinear recoverable and irrecoverable strain, and damage upon increasing stress for graphite and Ti3SiC2. Benitez et al.’s (2016) methodology of compressive cyclic loading and post-mortem electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to assess the prevalence of kinking based on low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) was used. Strains were measured with digital image correlation and EBSD was conducted on Ti3SiC2 leveraging dictionary indexing, which was necessary herein to identify LAGBs accurately. The stress–strain stages of Ti3SiC2 agree with literature on Ti2AlC. Damage and energy dissipation were more accelerated in graphite. No significant difference was observed in the fraction of LAGBs between pristine and unloaded Ti3SiC2. Trends observed and EBSD evidence that KBs were not dominant suggest that RBs are the primary dissipator of energy in both materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon
Carbon 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
7.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Carbon is an international multidisciplinary forum for communicating scientific advances in the field of carbon materials. It reports new findings related to the formation, structure, properties, behaviors, and technological applications of carbons. Carbons are a broad class of ordered or disordered solid phases composed primarily of elemental carbon, including but not limited to carbon black, carbon fibers and filaments, carbon nanotubes, diamond and diamond-like carbon, fullerenes, glassy carbon, graphite, graphene, graphene-oxide, porous carbons, pyrolytic carbon, and other sp2 and non-sp2 hybridized carbon systems. Carbon is the companion title to the open access journal Carbon Trends. Relevant application areas for carbon materials include biology and medicine, catalysis, electronic, optoelectronic, spintronic, high-frequency, and photonic devices, energy storage and conversion systems, environmental applications and water treatment, smart materials and systems, and structural and thermal applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信