高炉中富氢燃料喷射的材料和火用驱动的比较评估:可行性信封和碳减排

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Xiaohui Zhang , Nan Wang , Wenjun Duan , Haifeng Li , Min Chen
{"title":"高炉中富氢燃料喷射的材料和火用驱动的比较评估:可行性信封和碳减排","authors":"Xiaohui Zhang ,&nbsp;Nan Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Duan ,&nbsp;Haifeng Li ,&nbsp;Min Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the urgent need for decarbonization in ironmaking, this study investigates the sustainable co-injection of hydrogen-rich fuels, including hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), coke oven gas (COG), and natural gas (NG) with pulverized coal into blast furnaces. Based on a comprehensive mass-energy-exergy balance model incorporating the Rist operation line, a systematic evaluation model has been developed. This model enables synergistic assessment of technical indicators, CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction, and optimization of the matching relationship among hydrogen-rich fuels, pulverized coal, and oxygen enrichment ratio at a critical raceway adiabatic flame temperature (RAFT) of 2050 °C and reasonable top gas temperature. Under optimal operating conditions, the maximum injection rates for H<sub>2</sub>, COG, and NG are determined to be 165, 97, and 85 m<sup>3</sup>/THM, respectively, while the maximum carbon reduction amount with pulverized coal and H<sub>2</sub> co-injection reaches 9.03 %. In comparison to a traditional blast furnace, the input exergy of pulverized coal for H<sub>2</sub>, COG, and NG co-injection decreases by 7.11, 8.98 and 12.47 %, whereas the output exergy of blast furnace gas (BFG) increases by 20.29, 17.28 and 24.41 %, respectively. Furthermore, hydrogen-rich blast furnaces exhibit favorable performance in terms of energy efficiency and thermodynamic perfection degree. However, maintaining a constant RAFT in hydrogen-rich blast furnaces requires higher exergy input. This study provides a quantitative framework for optimizing the hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces, establishing decarbonization roadmaps for achieving low-carbon ironmaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"337 ","pages":"Article 138659"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material and exergy-driven comparative assessment of hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces: Feasibility envelope and carbon reduction\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohui Zhang ,&nbsp;Nan Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Duan ,&nbsp;Haifeng Li ,&nbsp;Min Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To address the urgent need for decarbonization in ironmaking, this study investigates the sustainable co-injection of hydrogen-rich fuels, including hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), coke oven gas (COG), and natural gas (NG) with pulverized coal into blast furnaces. Based on a comprehensive mass-energy-exergy balance model incorporating the Rist operation line, a systematic evaluation model has been developed. This model enables synergistic assessment of technical indicators, CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction, and optimization of the matching relationship among hydrogen-rich fuels, pulverized coal, and oxygen enrichment ratio at a critical raceway adiabatic flame temperature (RAFT) of 2050 °C and reasonable top gas temperature. Under optimal operating conditions, the maximum injection rates for H<sub>2</sub>, COG, and NG are determined to be 165, 97, and 85 m<sup>3</sup>/THM, respectively, while the maximum carbon reduction amount with pulverized coal and H<sub>2</sub> co-injection reaches 9.03 %. In comparison to a traditional blast furnace, the input exergy of pulverized coal for H<sub>2</sub>, COG, and NG co-injection decreases by 7.11, 8.98 and 12.47 %, whereas the output exergy of blast furnace gas (BFG) increases by 20.29, 17.28 and 24.41 %, respectively. Furthermore, hydrogen-rich blast furnaces exhibit favorable performance in terms of energy efficiency and thermodynamic perfection degree. However, maintaining a constant RAFT in hydrogen-rich blast furnaces requires higher exergy input. This study provides a quantitative framework for optimizing the hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces, establishing decarbonization roadmaps for achieving low-carbon ironmaking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy\",\"volume\":\"337 \",\"pages\":\"Article 138659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225043014\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225043014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决炼铁过程中脱碳的迫切需要,本研究研究了富氢燃料,包括氢(H2)、焦炉气(COG)和天然气(NG)与煤粉在高炉中的可持续共喷。在纳入Rist作业线的质能能综合平衡模型的基础上,建立了系统的评价模型。该模型能够在2050℃的临界滚道绝热火焰温度(RAFT)和合理的顶气温度下,协同评价技术指标和CO2减排,优化富氢燃料、煤粉和富氧比的匹配关系。在最佳工况下,H2、COG和NG的最大喷注速率分别为165、97和85 m3/THM,煤粉和H2共喷的最大减碳量为9.03%。与传统高炉相比,共喷H2、COG和NG的煤粉输入火用分别降低了7.11%、8.98%和12.47%,而高炉煤气输出火用分别增加了20.29%、17.28%和24.41%。此外,富氢高炉在能源效率和热力学完善度方面表现出良好的性能。然而,在富氢高炉中保持恒定的RAFT需要更高的火用输入。本研究为优化高炉富氢燃料喷注提供了定量框架,为实现低碳炼铁建立了脱碳路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Material and exergy-driven comparative assessment of hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces: Feasibility envelope and carbon reduction

Material and exergy-driven comparative assessment of hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces: Feasibility envelope and carbon reduction
To address the urgent need for decarbonization in ironmaking, this study investigates the sustainable co-injection of hydrogen-rich fuels, including hydrogen (H2), coke oven gas (COG), and natural gas (NG) with pulverized coal into blast furnaces. Based on a comprehensive mass-energy-exergy balance model incorporating the Rist operation line, a systematic evaluation model has been developed. This model enables synergistic assessment of technical indicators, CO2 emission reduction, and optimization of the matching relationship among hydrogen-rich fuels, pulverized coal, and oxygen enrichment ratio at a critical raceway adiabatic flame temperature (RAFT) of 2050 °C and reasonable top gas temperature. Under optimal operating conditions, the maximum injection rates for H2, COG, and NG are determined to be 165, 97, and 85 m3/THM, respectively, while the maximum carbon reduction amount with pulverized coal and H2 co-injection reaches 9.03 %. In comparison to a traditional blast furnace, the input exergy of pulverized coal for H2, COG, and NG co-injection decreases by 7.11, 8.98 and 12.47 %, whereas the output exergy of blast furnace gas (BFG) increases by 20.29, 17.28 and 24.41 %, respectively. Furthermore, hydrogen-rich blast furnaces exhibit favorable performance in terms of energy efficiency and thermodynamic perfection degree. However, maintaining a constant RAFT in hydrogen-rich blast furnaces requires higher exergy input. This study provides a quantitative framework for optimizing the hydrogen-rich fuels injection in blast furnaces, establishing decarbonization roadmaps for achieving low-carbon ironmaking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信