{"title":"南非农村的燃料堆积、住房质量和健康差距:双重机器学习方法","authors":"Nouran Zenelabden , Adeola Oyenubi , Johane Dikgang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between fuel type, housing quality, and health outcomes is examined in rural South Africa using the 2019 General Household Survey dataset from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). We apply double machine learning within a multivalued treatment effects framework to distinguish between clean, unclean, and mixed fuel types as treatment regimes, allowing us to infer health impacts from fuel-stacking behavior. Our findings show that using mixed fuels does not lead to health benefits from partially switching away from unclean fuels, which challenges common beliefs about “energy stacking” in low-income households. We also use Sorted Effects Analysis (SEA) to explore differences within the population and identify vulnerable groups most affected by the health risks of unclean fuel use. The SEA results reveal that the health effects of polluting fuels are not uniform, and there is some evidence that housing quality—such as roofing and walls—moderates the relationship between polluting fuels and health outcomes. These findings suggest that effective policies should consider the roles of fuel type, housing quality, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities to promote a fair and equitable transition to clean energy in rural South Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108926"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuel stacking, housing quality, and health disparities in rural South Africa: A double machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Nouran Zenelabden , Adeola Oyenubi , Johane Dikgang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The relationship between fuel type, housing quality, and health outcomes is examined in rural South Africa using the 2019 General Household Survey dataset from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). We apply double machine learning within a multivalued treatment effects framework to distinguish between clean, unclean, and mixed fuel types as treatment regimes, allowing us to infer health impacts from fuel-stacking behavior. Our findings show that using mixed fuels does not lead to health benefits from partially switching away from unclean fuels, which challenges common beliefs about “energy stacking” in low-income households. We also use Sorted Effects Analysis (SEA) to explore differences within the population and identify vulnerable groups most affected by the health risks of unclean fuel use. The SEA results reveal that the health effects of polluting fuels are not uniform, and there is some evidence that housing quality—such as roofing and walls—moderates the relationship between polluting fuels and health outcomes. These findings suggest that effective policies should consider the roles of fuel type, housing quality, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities to promote a fair and equitable transition to clean energy in rural South Africa.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007534\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fuel stacking, housing quality, and health disparities in rural South Africa: A double machine learning approach
The relationship between fuel type, housing quality, and health outcomes is examined in rural South Africa using the 2019 General Household Survey dataset from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). We apply double machine learning within a multivalued treatment effects framework to distinguish between clean, unclean, and mixed fuel types as treatment regimes, allowing us to infer health impacts from fuel-stacking behavior. Our findings show that using mixed fuels does not lead to health benefits from partially switching away from unclean fuels, which challenges common beliefs about “energy stacking” in low-income households. We also use Sorted Effects Analysis (SEA) to explore differences within the population and identify vulnerable groups most affected by the health risks of unclean fuel use. The SEA results reveal that the health effects of polluting fuels are not uniform, and there is some evidence that housing quality—such as roofing and walls—moderates the relationship between polluting fuels and health outcomes. These findings suggest that effective policies should consider the roles of fuel type, housing quality, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities to promote a fair and equitable transition to clean energy in rural South Africa.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.