不同储能理念的能源社区运行的经济激励基础

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Bernadette Fina , David Ribo-Perez
{"title":"不同储能理念的能源社区运行的经济激励基础","authors":"Bernadette Fina ,&nbsp;David Ribo-Perez","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reasons why community energy storages (CES) are, despite technological maturity, yet not widespread in energy communities (ECs) are manifold, and encompass questionable economic viability, absence of tailored regulation, and missing transparent operational processes leading to a lack of social acceptance. This work aims to tackle the increased uptake of CES concepts by framing the economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of ECs with central community storage as well as stationary and mobile swarm storage. Thereby, non-strategic behaviour as well as strategic operation procedures are investigated. Our analysis shows that variable retail energy prices cause a range of situations with different economic incentives for individual EC entities (e.g. prosumers, consumers, CES). We learn that economic operation incentives do not necessarily align with system- or grid-friendly behaviour, and can even lead to ’unnatural’ behaviour of ECs, such as minimising self-consumption instead of maximising it. This shows the necessity to consider a much more complex incentive structure at the community level in the future, addressing both, the possibilities as well as drawbacks and gaps identified within this study. We conclude that a range of legislative amendments will be inevitable, both at EU and national level, to foster a basis for CES integration that aligns economic goals of ECs with the needs of the energy system and the electricity grid, and avoids contradictory or unnatural behavioural incentives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108896"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of energy communities with different storage concepts\",\"authors\":\"Bernadette Fina ,&nbsp;David Ribo-Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The reasons why community energy storages (CES) are, despite technological maturity, yet not widespread in energy communities (ECs) are manifold, and encompass questionable economic viability, absence of tailored regulation, and missing transparent operational processes leading to a lack of social acceptance. This work aims to tackle the increased uptake of CES concepts by framing the economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of ECs with central community storage as well as stationary and mobile swarm storage. Thereby, non-strategic behaviour as well as strategic operation procedures are investigated. Our analysis shows that variable retail energy prices cause a range of situations with different economic incentives for individual EC entities (e.g. prosumers, consumers, CES). We learn that economic operation incentives do not necessarily align with system- or grid-friendly behaviour, and can even lead to ’unnatural’ behaviour of ECs, such as minimising self-consumption instead of maximising it. This shows the necessity to consider a much more complex incentive structure at the community level in the future, addressing both, the possibilities as well as drawbacks and gaps identified within this study. We conclude that a range of legislative amendments will be inevitable, both at EU and national level, to foster a basis for CES integration that aligns economic goals of ECs with the needs of the energy system and the electricity grid, and avoids contradictory or unnatural behavioural incentives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管技术成熟,但社区储能(CES)在能源社区(ec)中尚未普及的原因是多方面的,包括经济可行性问题、缺乏量身定制的监管以及缺乏透明的操作流程,导致缺乏社会接受度。这项工作旨在通过构建具有中央社区存储以及固定和移动群体存储的ec运行的经济激励基础来解决CES概念的日益普及问题。因此,非战略行为以及战略操作程序进行了调查。我们的分析表明,可变的零售能源价格对单个EC实体(如生产消费者、消费者、消费电子展)造成了一系列具有不同经济激励的情况。我们了解到,经济运行激励并不一定与系统或电网友好的行为相一致,甚至可能导致ec的“不自然”行为,例如最小化自我消耗而不是最大化自我消耗。这表明将来有必要在社区一级考虑一个更为复杂的激励结构,解决这两方面的问题,以及本研究中确定的可能性以及缺点和差距。我们的结论是,在欧盟和国家层面上,一系列的立法修正案将是不可避免的,以促进CES整合的基础,使ec的经济目标与能源系统和电网的需求保持一致,并避免相互矛盾或不自然的行为激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of energy communities with different storage concepts
The reasons why community energy storages (CES) are, despite technological maturity, yet not widespread in energy communities (ECs) are manifold, and encompass questionable economic viability, absence of tailored regulation, and missing transparent operational processes leading to a lack of social acceptance. This work aims to tackle the increased uptake of CES concepts by framing the economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of ECs with central community storage as well as stationary and mobile swarm storage. Thereby, non-strategic behaviour as well as strategic operation procedures are investigated. Our analysis shows that variable retail energy prices cause a range of situations with different economic incentives for individual EC entities (e.g. prosumers, consumers, CES). We learn that economic operation incentives do not necessarily align with system- or grid-friendly behaviour, and can even lead to ’unnatural’ behaviour of ECs, such as minimising self-consumption instead of maximising it. This shows the necessity to consider a much more complex incentive structure at the community level in the future, addressing both, the possibilities as well as drawbacks and gaps identified within this study. We conclude that a range of legislative amendments will be inevitable, both at EU and national level, to foster a basis for CES integration that aligns economic goals of ECs with the needs of the energy system and the electricity grid, and avoids contradictory or unnatural behavioural incentives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信