{"title":"不同储能理念的能源社区运行的经济激励基础","authors":"Bernadette Fina , David Ribo-Perez","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reasons why community energy storages (CES) are, despite technological maturity, yet not widespread in energy communities (ECs) are manifold, and encompass questionable economic viability, absence of tailored regulation, and missing transparent operational processes leading to a lack of social acceptance. This work aims to tackle the increased uptake of CES concepts by framing the economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of ECs with central community storage as well as stationary and mobile swarm storage. Thereby, non-strategic behaviour as well as strategic operation procedures are investigated. Our analysis shows that variable retail energy prices cause a range of situations with different economic incentives for individual EC entities (e.g. prosumers, consumers, CES). We learn that economic operation incentives do not necessarily align with system- or grid-friendly behaviour, and can even lead to ’unnatural’ behaviour of ECs, such as minimising self-consumption instead of maximising it. This shows the necessity to consider a much more complex incentive structure at the community level in the future, addressing both, the possibilities as well as drawbacks and gaps identified within this study. We conclude that a range of legislative amendments will be inevitable, both at EU and national level, to foster a basis for CES integration that aligns economic goals of ECs with the needs of the energy system and the electricity grid, and avoids contradictory or unnatural behavioural incentives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108896"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of energy communities with different storage concepts\",\"authors\":\"Bernadette Fina , David Ribo-Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The reasons why community energy storages (CES) are, despite technological maturity, yet not widespread in energy communities (ECs) are manifold, and encompass questionable economic viability, absence of tailored regulation, and missing transparent operational processes leading to a lack of social acceptance. This work aims to tackle the increased uptake of CES concepts by framing the economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of ECs with central community storage as well as stationary and mobile swarm storage. Thereby, non-strategic behaviour as well as strategic operation procedures are investigated. Our analysis shows that variable retail energy prices cause a range of situations with different economic incentives for individual EC entities (e.g. prosumers, consumers, CES). We learn that economic operation incentives do not necessarily align with system- or grid-friendly behaviour, and can even lead to ’unnatural’ behaviour of ECs, such as minimising self-consumption instead of maximising it. This shows the necessity to consider a much more complex incentive structure at the community level in the future, addressing both, the possibilities as well as drawbacks and gaps identified within this study. We conclude that a range of legislative amendments will be inevitable, both at EU and national level, to foster a basis for CES integration that aligns economic goals of ECs with the needs of the energy system and the electricity grid, and avoids contradictory or unnatural behavioural incentives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of energy communities with different storage concepts
The reasons why community energy storages (CES) are, despite technological maturity, yet not widespread in energy communities (ECs) are manifold, and encompass questionable economic viability, absence of tailored regulation, and missing transparent operational processes leading to a lack of social acceptance. This work aims to tackle the increased uptake of CES concepts by framing the economic incentive fundamentals for the operation of ECs with central community storage as well as stationary and mobile swarm storage. Thereby, non-strategic behaviour as well as strategic operation procedures are investigated. Our analysis shows that variable retail energy prices cause a range of situations with different economic incentives for individual EC entities (e.g. prosumers, consumers, CES). We learn that economic operation incentives do not necessarily align with system- or grid-friendly behaviour, and can even lead to ’unnatural’ behaviour of ECs, such as minimising self-consumption instead of maximising it. This shows the necessity to consider a much more complex incentive structure at the community level in the future, addressing both, the possibilities as well as drawbacks and gaps identified within this study. We conclude that a range of legislative amendments will be inevitable, both at EU and national level, to foster a basis for CES integration that aligns economic goals of ECs with the needs of the energy system and the electricity grid, and avoids contradictory or unnatural behavioural incentives.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.