农业利用泥炭地厌氧分解对温室气体排放的高贡献

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Jim Boonman , Duygu Tolunay , Joost Keuskamp , Liam Heffernan , Alexander J.V. Buzacott , Sarah Faye Harpenslager , Gijs van Dijk , Mariet Hefting , Ype van der Velde
{"title":"农业利用泥炭地厌氧分解对温室气体排放的高贡献","authors":"Jim Boonman ,&nbsp;Duygu Tolunay ,&nbsp;Joost Keuskamp ,&nbsp;Liam Heffernan ,&nbsp;Alexander J.V. Buzacott ,&nbsp;Sarah Faye Harpenslager ,&nbsp;Gijs van Dijk ,&nbsp;Mariet Hefting ,&nbsp;Ype van der Velde","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, peatlands store one third of global soil carbon. Peatlands accumulate carbon under waterlogged anoxic conditions, but current drainage increases oxygen availability enhancing degradation of these carbon reserves. Therefore, drainage is responsible for ∼ 2 % of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. GHG emission estimates from drained peatlands are often based on hydrological proxies, but these methods are known to result in consistent inaccuracies. In this research, we propose to improve these estimates by using the redox potential that controls peat degradation more directly as compared to hydrological proxies. We aimed to quantify in-situ (net) soil production rates of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> by combining in-situ redox potential measurements with corresponding laboratory basal respiration rates scaled to in-situ soil temperature. Using this approach, we estimated soil CO<sub>2</sub> and net CH<sub>4</sub> production rates at 12 field sites over multiple years and validated these estimates by comparing them to aboveground Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB) measurements using continuously operating chambers (for CO<sub>2</sub>) and eddy covariance measurements (for CH<sub>4</sub>) over the same sites and timeframes. We hypothesized that (1) laboratory incubation measurements can serve as a basis to estimate field-scale CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, (2) compared to water table depth, the redox potential is a more reliable parameter for estimating soil CO<sub>2</sub> production, and (3) anaerobic respiration processes contribute substantially to peat decomposition and soil CO<sub>2</sub> production. Averaged soil production estimates over multipole years for all sites of CO<sub>2</sub> showed strong agreement with measured NECBs (concordance correlation coefficient, CCC = 0.80) and net soil production estimates of CH<sub>4</sub> showed moderately strong agreement (CCC = 0.65) with CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Using water table depth instead of soil redox condition to calculate soil CO<sub>2</sub> production rates resulted in a very low agreement with measured NECBs (CCC = 0.08) due to overestimation of the prevalence of oxic conditions. Shorter term comparisons generally resulted in lower CCC values, likely due to (bio)chemical legacy effects that balanced out over longer timescales. Anaerobic respiration processes accounted for 68 % of total soil CO<sub>2</sub> production over all sites, with 61 % originating from soil layers that were exposed to oxygen within the past 1.5 years, also likely influenced by biological and chemical legacy effects. By bridging the gap between laboratory and field-scale, our approach provides a valuable tool for assessing GHG emissions from drained peatlands and enhances our understanding of aerobic and anaerobic peat decomposition processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 117521"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High contributions of anaerobic decomposition to greenhouse gas emissions of agriculturally used peatlands\",\"authors\":\"Jim Boonman ,&nbsp;Duygu Tolunay ,&nbsp;Joost Keuskamp ,&nbsp;Liam Heffernan ,&nbsp;Alexander J.V. Buzacott ,&nbsp;Sarah Faye Harpenslager ,&nbsp;Gijs van Dijk ,&nbsp;Mariet Hefting ,&nbsp;Ype van der Velde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Globally, peatlands store one third of global soil carbon. Peatlands accumulate carbon under waterlogged anoxic conditions, but current drainage increases oxygen availability enhancing degradation of these carbon reserves. Therefore, drainage is responsible for ∼ 2 % of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. GHG emission estimates from drained peatlands are often based on hydrological proxies, but these methods are known to result in consistent inaccuracies. In this research, we propose to improve these estimates by using the redox potential that controls peat degradation more directly as compared to hydrological proxies. We aimed to quantify in-situ (net) soil production rates of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> by combining in-situ redox potential measurements with corresponding laboratory basal respiration rates scaled to in-situ soil temperature. Using this approach, we estimated soil CO<sub>2</sub> and net CH<sub>4</sub> production rates at 12 field sites over multiple years and validated these estimates by comparing them to aboveground Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB) measurements using continuously operating chambers (for CO<sub>2</sub>) and eddy covariance measurements (for CH<sub>4</sub>) over the same sites and timeframes. We hypothesized that (1) laboratory incubation measurements can serve as a basis to estimate field-scale CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, (2) compared to water table depth, the redox potential is a more reliable parameter for estimating soil CO<sub>2</sub> production, and (3) anaerobic respiration processes contribute substantially to peat decomposition and soil CO<sub>2</sub> production. Averaged soil production estimates over multipole years for all sites of CO<sub>2</sub> showed strong agreement with measured NECBs (concordance correlation coefficient, CCC = 0.80) and net soil production estimates of CH<sub>4</sub> showed moderately strong agreement (CCC = 0.65) with CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Using water table depth instead of soil redox condition to calculate soil CO<sub>2</sub> production rates resulted in a very low agreement with measured NECBs (CCC = 0.08) due to overestimation of the prevalence of oxic conditions. Shorter term comparisons generally resulted in lower CCC values, likely due to (bio)chemical legacy effects that balanced out over longer timescales. Anaerobic respiration processes accounted for 68 % of total soil CO<sub>2</sub> production over all sites, with 61 % originating from soil layers that were exposed to oxygen within the past 1.5 years, also likely influenced by biological and chemical legacy effects. By bridging the gap between laboratory and field-scale, our approach provides a valuable tool for assessing GHG emissions from drained peatlands and enhances our understanding of aerobic and anaerobic peat decomposition processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma\",\"volume\":\"462 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003623\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,泥炭地储存了全球三分之一的土壤碳。泥炭地在淹水缺氧条件下积累碳,但目前的排水增加了氧气的可用性,促进了这些碳储量的降解。因此,排水占人为温室气体(GHG)排放的约2%。排水泥炭地的温室气体排放估算通常基于水文代用物,但已知这些方法会导致一贯的不准确性。在这项研究中,我们建议通过使用与水文代理相比更直接控制泥炭退化的氧化还原电位来改进这些估计。我们旨在通过结合原位氧化还原电位测量和相应的按原位土壤温度缩放的实验室基础呼吸速率来量化原位(净)土壤CO2和CH4的产生速率。利用这种方法,我们估计了12个野外地点多年来的土壤CO2和净CH4产出率,并通过将它们与地面上的净生态系统碳平衡(NECB)测量值进行比较,验证了这些估计,这些测量值使用连续操作室(用于CO2)和涡动相关方差测量(用于CH4),在相同的地点和时间框架内。我们假设:(1)实验室孵化测量可以作为估算野外规模CO2和CH4排放量的基础;(2)与地下水位深度相比,氧化还原电位是估算土壤CO2产量的更可靠参数;(3)厌氧呼吸过程对泥炭分解和土壤CO2产量有重要贡献。在多极年期间,所有CO2站点的平均土壤产量估计值与测量的necb(一致性相关系数,CCC = 0.80)具有很强的一致性,而CH4的净土壤产量估计值与CH4排放量具有中等强的一致性(CCC = 0.65)。使用地下水位深度而不是土壤氧化还原条件来计算土壤二氧化碳产出率,由于高估了氧化条件的普遍性,结果与测量的necb的一致性非常低(CCC = 0.08)。短期比较通常导致较低的CCC值,可能是由于(生物)化学遗留效应在较长的时间尺度上平衡。厌氧呼吸过程占所有站点土壤总二氧化碳产量的68%,其中61%来自过去1.5年内暴露于氧气的土层,也可能受到生物和化学遗留效应的影响。通过弥合实验室和现场规模之间的差距,我们的方法为评估排水泥炭地的温室气体排放提供了一个有价值的工具,并增强了我们对好氧和厌氧泥炭分解过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High contributions of anaerobic decomposition to greenhouse gas emissions of agriculturally used peatlands
Globally, peatlands store one third of global soil carbon. Peatlands accumulate carbon under waterlogged anoxic conditions, but current drainage increases oxygen availability enhancing degradation of these carbon reserves. Therefore, drainage is responsible for ∼ 2 % of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. GHG emission estimates from drained peatlands are often based on hydrological proxies, but these methods are known to result in consistent inaccuracies. In this research, we propose to improve these estimates by using the redox potential that controls peat degradation more directly as compared to hydrological proxies. We aimed to quantify in-situ (net) soil production rates of CO2 and CH4 by combining in-situ redox potential measurements with corresponding laboratory basal respiration rates scaled to in-situ soil temperature. Using this approach, we estimated soil CO2 and net CH4 production rates at 12 field sites over multiple years and validated these estimates by comparing them to aboveground Net Ecosystem Carbon Balance (NECB) measurements using continuously operating chambers (for CO2) and eddy covariance measurements (for CH4) over the same sites and timeframes. We hypothesized that (1) laboratory incubation measurements can serve as a basis to estimate field-scale CO2 and CH4 emissions, (2) compared to water table depth, the redox potential is a more reliable parameter for estimating soil CO2 production, and (3) anaerobic respiration processes contribute substantially to peat decomposition and soil CO2 production. Averaged soil production estimates over multipole years for all sites of CO2 showed strong agreement with measured NECBs (concordance correlation coefficient, CCC = 0.80) and net soil production estimates of CH4 showed moderately strong agreement (CCC = 0.65) with CH4 emissions. Using water table depth instead of soil redox condition to calculate soil CO2 production rates resulted in a very low agreement with measured NECBs (CCC = 0.08) due to overestimation of the prevalence of oxic conditions. Shorter term comparisons generally resulted in lower CCC values, likely due to (bio)chemical legacy effects that balanced out over longer timescales. Anaerobic respiration processes accounted for 68 % of total soil CO2 production over all sites, with 61 % originating from soil layers that were exposed to oxygen within the past 1.5 years, also likely influenced by biological and chemical legacy effects. By bridging the gap between laboratory and field-scale, our approach provides a valuable tool for assessing GHG emissions from drained peatlands and enhances our understanding of aerobic and anaerobic peat decomposition processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信