高海拔的火星羽状物很可能是一种普通的黄昏云

IF 3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
M.M.J. Crismani , M.S. Chaffin , K. Connour , N.M. Schneider , S. Curry , J. Deighan , R. Fitzpatrick , S. Jain , G. Liuzzi , M. Slipski , G.L. Villanueva
{"title":"高海拔的火星羽状物很可能是一种普通的黄昏云","authors":"M.M.J. Crismani ,&nbsp;M.S. Chaffin ,&nbsp;K. Connour ,&nbsp;N.M. Schneider ,&nbsp;S. Curry ,&nbsp;J. Deighan ,&nbsp;R. Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;S. Jain ,&nbsp;G. Liuzzi ,&nbsp;M. Slipski ,&nbsp;G.L. Villanueva","doi":"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead, more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13199,"journal":{"name":"Icarus","volume":"444 ","pages":"Article 116823"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-altitude Martian plume is likely an ordinary twilight cloud\",\"authors\":\"M.M.J. Crismani ,&nbsp;M.S. Chaffin ,&nbsp;K. Connour ,&nbsp;N.M. Schneider ,&nbsp;S. Curry ,&nbsp;J. Deighan ,&nbsp;R. Fitzpatrick ,&nbsp;S. Jain ,&nbsp;G. Liuzzi ,&nbsp;M. Slipski ,&nbsp;G.L. Villanueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead, more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Icarus\",\"volume\":\"444 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116823\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Icarus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103525003719\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icarus","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103525003719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Sánchez-Lavega等人(2015)分析了火星的地基和天基图像,他们认为这些图像显示了两个高空羽流。他们得出的羽流高度为200至250公里或更高,这与当时已知的大气过程不符。从那以后的十年里,尽管目前绕地球运行的航天器舰队进行了大量观测,但没有发表任何支持观测结果。相反,最近的观察结果对当时提出的解释提供了强有力的限制。因此,我们重新分析了该工作中使用的图像,并审查了Sánchez-Lavega等人(2015)采用的方法。我们已经确定了原始数据处理中可能影响高度确定的几个问题,包括地物配准、黑电平选择、彩色图像对齐、不一致的地图网格、未知图像预处理以及系统不确定性的传播。我们的独立分析表明,这些图像中的特征与高度在50至100公里之间的后终结云一致。这种云在火星上相对常见,不需要新的大气物理学或化学来理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-altitude Martian plume is likely an ordinary twilight cloud
Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015) analyzed ground-based and space-based images of Mars that they interpreted as showing two high-altitude plumes. Their derived plume altitudes of 200 to 250 km or higher defied atmospheric processes known at the time. No supporting observations have been published in the decade since, despite ample observations by the fleet of spacecraft currently orbiting the planet. Instead, more recent observations provide strong constraints against the interpretations proposed at the time. We therefore reanalyzed the images used in that work and reviewed the methods employed by Sánchez-Lavega et al. (2015). We have identified several issues in the original data processing that may have affected the altitude determination, including surface-feature registration, black-level selection, color-image alignment, inconsistent map gridding, unknown image preprocessing, and the propagation of systematic uncertainties. Our independent analysis indicates that the features in these images are consistent with post-terminator clouds with altitudes between 50 and 100 km. Such clouds are relatively common at Mars and require no new atmospheric physics or chemistry to understand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Icarus
Icarus 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
356
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Icarus is devoted to the publication of original contributions in the field of Solar System studies. Manuscripts reporting the results of new research - observational, experimental, or theoretical - concerning the astronomy, geology, meteorology, physics, chemistry, biology, and other scientific aspects of our Solar System or extrasolar systems are welcome. The journal generally does not publish papers devoted exclusively to the Sun, the Earth, celestial mechanics, meteoritics, or astrophysics. Icarus does not publish papers that provide "improved" versions of Bode''s law, or other numerical relations, without a sound physical basis. Icarus does not publish meeting announcements or general notices. Reviews, historical papers, and manuscripts describing spacecraft instrumentation may be considered, but only with prior approval of the editor. An entire issue of the journal is occasionally devoted to a single subject, usually arising from a conference on the same topic. The language of publication is English. American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信