{"title":"基于模拟的氢液化过程热力学分析:设计意义和局限性","authors":"Amjad Riaz , Ahmad Naquash , Muhammad Abdul Qyyum","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) liquefaction systems using several thermodynamic models to better understand how property predictions affect process performance. Simulations were conducted in Aspen HYSYS® and Aspen Plus® using four equations of state: Peng-Robinson (PR), Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Modified Benedict-Webb-Rubin (MBWR), and RefProp (RF). The analysis focused on key parameters such as enthalpy, entropy, exergy, and heat capacity across cryogenic temperatures. Results show that model selection significantly impacts energy efficiency and heat integration. Additionally, the risk of refrigerant freezing at extremely low temperatures is evaluated, which can cause operational issues, and the most stable compositions are identified. The analysis of heat exchanger behavior shows that variations in fluid properties can change energy recovery by up to 45%. Results reveal that MBWR and RF models provide more accurate predictions in cryogenic conditions, thereby may potentially improve process efficiency by approximately 20% compared to other models. The findings underscore the criticality of accurate thermodynamic modeling in designing efficient and commercially viable liquid H<sub>2</sub> production processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 120542"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-based thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen liquefaction processes: Design implications and limitations\",\"authors\":\"Amjad Riaz , Ahmad Naquash , Muhammad Abdul Qyyum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) liquefaction systems using several thermodynamic models to better understand how property predictions affect process performance. Simulations were conducted in Aspen HYSYS® and Aspen Plus® using four equations of state: Peng-Robinson (PR), Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Modified Benedict-Webb-Rubin (MBWR), and RefProp (RF). The analysis focused on key parameters such as enthalpy, entropy, exergy, and heat capacity across cryogenic temperatures. Results show that model selection significantly impacts energy efficiency and heat integration. Additionally, the risk of refrigerant freezing at extremely low temperatures is evaluated, which can cause operational issues, and the most stable compositions are identified. The analysis of heat exchanger behavior shows that variations in fluid properties can change energy recovery by up to 45%. Results reveal that MBWR and RF models provide more accurate predictions in cryogenic conditions, thereby may potentially improve process efficiency by approximately 20% compared to other models. The findings underscore the criticality of accurate thermodynamic modeling in designing efficient and commercially viable liquid H<sub>2</sub> production processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425010660\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425010660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simulation-based thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen liquefaction processes: Design implications and limitations
This study evaluates hydrogen (H2) liquefaction systems using several thermodynamic models to better understand how property predictions affect process performance. Simulations were conducted in Aspen HYSYS® and Aspen Plus® using four equations of state: Peng-Robinson (PR), Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Modified Benedict-Webb-Rubin (MBWR), and RefProp (RF). The analysis focused on key parameters such as enthalpy, entropy, exergy, and heat capacity across cryogenic temperatures. Results show that model selection significantly impacts energy efficiency and heat integration. Additionally, the risk of refrigerant freezing at extremely low temperatures is evaluated, which can cause operational issues, and the most stable compositions are identified. The analysis of heat exchanger behavior shows that variations in fluid properties can change energy recovery by up to 45%. Results reveal that MBWR and RF models provide more accurate predictions in cryogenic conditions, thereby may potentially improve process efficiency by approximately 20% compared to other models. The findings underscore the criticality of accurate thermodynamic modeling in designing efficient and commercially viable liquid H2 production processes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics.
The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.