M. David Rudd , Gretchen J. Diefenbach , David F. Tolin , Andrea Pérez-Muñoz , Taylor Flowers , Burak Tuna , Vivian L. Gleason , Jacob Tempchin , Craig J. Bryan
{"title":"简易自杀认知量表对住院、门诊、急诊科高危病人临床样本的临床应用","authors":"M. David Rudd , Gretchen J. Diefenbach , David F. Tolin , Andrea Pérez-Muñoz , Taylor Flowers , Burak Tuna , Vivian L. Gleason , Jacob Tempchin , Craig J. Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study explored the clinical utility of the Brief Suicide Cognitions Scale (B-SCS) in multiple samples, including a normative sample and three clinical samples with varying degrees of suicide risk. Derived cutting scores were identical across an inpatient randomized clinical trial (RCT) sample, an emergency department (ED) sample, and an inpatient consecutive admission sample, with B-SCS scores at intake correctly predicting 96 % and 94 % of suicide attempts over six-month follow-up periods in the RCT and ED samples, respectively. Additionally, the B-SCS intake scores in the RCT sample predicted differences in high and low suicide ideation groups over the six-month follow-up period, with those below the B-SCS intake cutoff score reporting suicidal ideation scores within normal limits throughout the entirety of post-discharge follow-up. Current results support the recommendation that evaluation of the clinical utility of instruments identifying suicide risk require variable criteria depending on the specific clinical context and related clinical decision-making. With respect to post-discharge monitoring and related treatment tailoring for inpatient and ED clinical environments, instruments with strong sensitivity and high negative predictive value (NPV) estimates are of particular importance given the need to accurately recognize both the resolution of an acute episode of suicide risk and identify those vulnerable for future episodes. In the current study, the B-SCS had sensitivity estimates of .96 and .94 and NPV estimates of .97 and .93. in these clinical settings. Implications for day-to-day practice, the need for future research, and study limitations are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Pages 155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of the brief suicide cognitions scale with high-risk inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department clinical samples\",\"authors\":\"M. David Rudd , Gretchen J. Diefenbach , David F. Tolin , Andrea Pérez-Muñoz , Taylor Flowers , Burak Tuna , Vivian L. Gleason , Jacob Tempchin , Craig J. Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.09.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current study explored the clinical utility of the Brief Suicide Cognitions Scale (B-SCS) in multiple samples, including a normative sample and three clinical samples with varying degrees of suicide risk. Derived cutting scores were identical across an inpatient randomized clinical trial (RCT) sample, an emergency department (ED) sample, and an inpatient consecutive admission sample, with B-SCS scores at intake correctly predicting 96 % and 94 % of suicide attempts over six-month follow-up periods in the RCT and ED samples, respectively. Additionally, the B-SCS intake scores in the RCT sample predicted differences in high and low suicide ideation groups over the six-month follow-up period, with those below the B-SCS intake cutoff score reporting suicidal ideation scores within normal limits throughout the entirety of post-discharge follow-up. Current results support the recommendation that evaluation of the clinical utility of instruments identifying suicide risk require variable criteria depending on the specific clinical context and related clinical decision-making. With respect to post-discharge monitoring and related treatment tailoring for inpatient and ED clinical environments, instruments with strong sensitivity and high negative predictive value (NPV) estimates are of particular importance given the need to accurately recognize both the resolution of an acute episode of suicide risk and identify those vulnerable for future episodes. In the current study, the B-SCS had sensitivity estimates of .96 and .94 and NPV estimates of .97 and .93. in these clinical settings. Implications for day-to-day practice, the need for future research, and study limitations are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 155-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625005576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625005576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical utility of the brief suicide cognitions scale with high-risk inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department clinical samples
The current study explored the clinical utility of the Brief Suicide Cognitions Scale (B-SCS) in multiple samples, including a normative sample and three clinical samples with varying degrees of suicide risk. Derived cutting scores were identical across an inpatient randomized clinical trial (RCT) sample, an emergency department (ED) sample, and an inpatient consecutive admission sample, with B-SCS scores at intake correctly predicting 96 % and 94 % of suicide attempts over six-month follow-up periods in the RCT and ED samples, respectively. Additionally, the B-SCS intake scores in the RCT sample predicted differences in high and low suicide ideation groups over the six-month follow-up period, with those below the B-SCS intake cutoff score reporting suicidal ideation scores within normal limits throughout the entirety of post-discharge follow-up. Current results support the recommendation that evaluation of the clinical utility of instruments identifying suicide risk require variable criteria depending on the specific clinical context and related clinical decision-making. With respect to post-discharge monitoring and related treatment tailoring for inpatient and ED clinical environments, instruments with strong sensitivity and high negative predictive value (NPV) estimates are of particular importance given the need to accurately recognize both the resolution of an acute episode of suicide risk and identify those vulnerable for future episodes. In the current study, the B-SCS had sensitivity estimates of .96 and .94 and NPV estimates of .97 and .93. in these clinical settings. Implications for day-to-day practice, the need for future research, and study limitations are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;