FDA和EMA批准datopotamab-deruxtecan:乳腺癌药物评估的范式转变?

IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Armando Orlandi
{"title":"FDA和EMA批准datopotamab-deruxtecan:乳腺癌药物评估的范式转变?","authors":"Armando Orlandi","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The January 2025 FDA and EMA approvals of datopotamab-deruxtecan for metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer represents an unprecedented regulatory decision. The TROPION-Breast01 trial demonstrated significant progression-free survival improvement (6.9 vs 4.9 months; HR 0.63) but failed to show overall survival benefit (18.6 vs 18.3 months; HR 1.01)[1,2]. This marks the first full approval of a breast cancer therapeutic that failed a co-primary overall survival endpoint. Subsequently, the European Medicines Agency also granted marketing authorization in January 2025, creating a concerning precedent across both major regulatory agencies. With both major regulatory agencies now having approved this agent, breast cancer specialists must grapple with fundamental questions: What constitutes meaningful clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients? How should we interpret trials with divergent endpoint results? This commentary examines the implications for breast cancer practice and argues for urgent reassessment of evidence standards as the therapeutic landscape evolves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104589"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA and EMA approval of datopotamab-deruxtecan: A paradigm shift in breast cancer drug evaluation?\",\"authors\":\"Armando Orlandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The January 2025 FDA and EMA approvals of datopotamab-deruxtecan for metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer represents an unprecedented regulatory decision. The TROPION-Breast01 trial demonstrated significant progression-free survival improvement (6.9 vs 4.9 months; HR 0.63) but failed to show overall survival benefit (18.6 vs 18.3 months; HR 1.01)[1,2]. This marks the first full approval of a breast cancer therapeutic that failed a co-primary overall survival endpoint. Subsequently, the European Medicines Agency also granted marketing authorization in January 2025, creating a concerning precedent across both major regulatory agencies. With both major regulatory agencies now having approved this agent, breast cancer specialists must grapple with fundamental questions: What constitutes meaningful clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients? How should we interpret trials with divergent endpoint results? This commentary examines the implications for breast cancer practice and argues for urgent reassessment of evidence standards as the therapeutic landscape evolves.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762500606X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762500606X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2025年1月,FDA和EMA批准datopotamab-deruxtecan治疗转移性hr阳性、her2阴性乳腺癌,这是一项前所未有的监管决定。TROPION-Breast01试验显示无进展生存期显著改善(6.9个月vs 4.9个月;HR 0.63),但未能显示总生存期获益(18.6个月vs 18.3个月;HR 1.01)[1,2]。这标志着首次全面批准了一种未能达到共同主要总生存终点的乳腺癌治疗方法。随后,欧洲药品管理局也于2025年1月批准了上市许可,在两个主要监管机构中创造了一个令人担忧的先例。现在两大监管机构都批准了这种药物,乳腺癌专家必须努力解决一些基本问题:什么构成了大量预处理患者的有意义的临床益处?我们应该如何解释具有不同终点结果的试验?这篇评论探讨了对乳腺癌实践的影响,并主张随着治疗领域的发展,对证据标准进行紧急重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FDA and EMA approval of datopotamab-deruxtecan: A paradigm shift in breast cancer drug evaluation?
The January 2025 FDA and EMA approvals of datopotamab-deruxtecan for metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer represents an unprecedented regulatory decision. The TROPION-Breast01 trial demonstrated significant progression-free survival improvement (6.9 vs 4.9 months; HR 0.63) but failed to show overall survival benefit (18.6 vs 18.3 months; HR 1.01)[1,2]. This marks the first full approval of a breast cancer therapeutic that failed a co-primary overall survival endpoint. Subsequently, the European Medicines Agency also granted marketing authorization in January 2025, creating a concerning precedent across both major regulatory agencies. With both major regulatory agencies now having approved this agent, breast cancer specialists must grapple with fundamental questions: What constitutes meaningful clinical benefit in heavily pretreated patients? How should we interpret trials with divergent endpoint results? This commentary examines the implications for breast cancer practice and argues for urgent reassessment of evidence standards as the therapeutic landscape evolves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信