从感知健康到接受:影响者类型如何影响消费者对昆虫食品的接受程度

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Zining Wang , Mai Nguyen , Jaewoo Park , Yanzhe Yuan
{"title":"从感知健康到接受:影响者类型如何影响消费者对昆虫食品的接受程度","authors":"Zining Wang ,&nbsp;Mai Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park ,&nbsp;Yanzhe Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the rise of influencer marketing in the food sector and the ongoing challenge of promoting consumer acceptance of insect-based foods, this research investigated how influencer type (health-focused vs. indulgence-focused) affects consumer acceptance and identified underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. Across three experiments, endorsements from health-focused influencers consistently enhanced consumers' perceptions of the healthiness of insect-based foods, which in turn significantly increased their acceptance. In contrast, perceived tastiness did not significantly differ by influencer type and did not mediate the overall effect, although it consistently emerged as a stronger predictor of acceptance than perceived healthiness. Moderated mediation analyses further revealed that the positive indirect effect of health-focused influencers on consumer acceptance via enhanced healthiness perceptions was more pronounced for hedonic (vs. utilitarian) insect-based foods. Moreover, this indirect effect was significant only among individuals with high health consciousness and no prior experience with consuming such products. While the mediating role of perceived tastiness was consistently insignificant, the impact of perceived tastiness on acceptance was significantly weaker among highly health-conscious consumers and stronger among those with prior experience consuming insect-based foods. By contrast, no significant moderating effects were observed for food neophobia or disgust toward entomophagy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105719"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From perceived healthiness to acceptance: How influencer type shapes consumer acceptance of insect-based foods\",\"authors\":\"Zining Wang ,&nbsp;Mai Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park ,&nbsp;Yanzhe Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given the rise of influencer marketing in the food sector and the ongoing challenge of promoting consumer acceptance of insect-based foods, this research investigated how influencer type (health-focused vs. indulgence-focused) affects consumer acceptance and identified underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. Across three experiments, endorsements from health-focused influencers consistently enhanced consumers' perceptions of the healthiness of insect-based foods, which in turn significantly increased their acceptance. In contrast, perceived tastiness did not significantly differ by influencer type and did not mediate the overall effect, although it consistently emerged as a stronger predictor of acceptance than perceived healthiness. Moderated mediation analyses further revealed that the positive indirect effect of health-focused influencers on consumer acceptance via enhanced healthiness perceptions was more pronounced for hedonic (vs. utilitarian) insect-based foods. Moreover, this indirect effect was significant only among individuals with high health consciousness and no prior experience with consuming such products. While the mediating role of perceived tastiness was consistently insignificant, the impact of perceived tastiness on acceptance was significantly weaker among highly health-conscious consumers and stronger among those with prior experience consuming insect-based foods. By contrast, no significant moderating effects were observed for food neophobia or disgust toward entomophagy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002940\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于影响者营销在食品行业的兴起以及促进消费者接受昆虫食品的持续挑战,本研究调查了影响者类型(以健康为中心vs.以放纵为中心)如何影响消费者的接受程度,并确定了潜在的心理机制和边界条件。在三项实验中,关注健康的影响者的认可不断增强消费者对昆虫食品健康的看法,这反过来又显著提高了他们的接受度。相比之下,感知到的美味并没有因影响者类型而显着差异,也没有调节整体效果,尽管它始终是比感知到的健康更强的接受预测指标。有调节的中介分析进一步揭示,以健康为重点的影响者通过增强健康观念对消费者接受度的积极间接影响,在享乐(与功利)昆虫为基础的食物中更为明显。此外,这种间接影响仅在健康意识高且没有消费此类产品经验的个体中显着。虽然感知味道的中介作用始终不显著,但感知味道对接受度的影响在高度健康意识的消费者中显着较弱,而在先前食用过昆虫类食品的消费者中较强。相比之下,对新食物恐惧症或对食虫的厌恶没有明显的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From perceived healthiness to acceptance: How influencer type shapes consumer acceptance of insect-based foods
Given the rise of influencer marketing in the food sector and the ongoing challenge of promoting consumer acceptance of insect-based foods, this research investigated how influencer type (health-focused vs. indulgence-focused) affects consumer acceptance and identified underlying psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions. Across three experiments, endorsements from health-focused influencers consistently enhanced consumers' perceptions of the healthiness of insect-based foods, which in turn significantly increased their acceptance. In contrast, perceived tastiness did not significantly differ by influencer type and did not mediate the overall effect, although it consistently emerged as a stronger predictor of acceptance than perceived healthiness. Moderated mediation analyses further revealed that the positive indirect effect of health-focused influencers on consumer acceptance via enhanced healthiness perceptions was more pronounced for hedonic (vs. utilitarian) insect-based foods. Moreover, this indirect effect was significant only among individuals with high health consciousness and no prior experience with consuming such products. While the mediating role of perceived tastiness was consistently insignificant, the impact of perceived tastiness on acceptance was significantly weaker among highly health-conscious consumers and stronger among those with prior experience consuming insect-based foods. By contrast, no significant moderating effects were observed for food neophobia or disgust toward entomophagy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信