{"title":"优化一种有效的劳动效率的基于培养的方案,以减少单核细胞增生李斯特菌检测的假阳性","authors":"Tessa Tuytschaever , Marieke Mispelaere , Katleen Raes , Paco Hulpiau , Imca Sampers","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ISO 11290:2017 method for detecting and enumerating <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> is detailed but labor-intensive. To reduce labor, modifications such as using fewer selective media or confirmation tests are often implemented. To ensure modified protocols are as precise as the official ISO 11290:2017, they must (or should) be validated against this standard according to ISO 16140. This resulted in numerous validated alternative methods. However, false positives still occur, making it crucial to optimize these labor-efficient protocols. This study aimed to optimize an existing validated labor-efficient culture-based (LECB) protocol consisting of three steps: initial detection on a selective medium, followed by purification of the isolate, and confirmation of the isolate. Screening was conducted on eight false-positive and 13 true-positive <em>L. monocytogenes</em> strains using five selective media and four confirmation tests to identify appropriate culture media and confirmation tests to develop a reliable, optimized LECB protocol. Only RAPID’ L. mono distinguished false from true positives and was incorporated into the optimized protocol, along with the hemolysis test. The optimized LECB protocol was tested in parallel with the original LECB protocol using three stock cultures and 66 fresh presumptive <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and <em>Listeria</em> spp. isolates. Annotated genomes of the eight false-positive and 13 true-positive isolates were screened for genes linked to agar and test selectivity. Quantitative PCR was also evaluated as an alternative confirmation method. This study demonstrates an approach for optimizing validated protocols, although full ISO 16140 validation remains necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111736"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of a validated labor-efficient culture-based protocol to decrease false positives in Listeria monocytogenes detection\",\"authors\":\"Tessa Tuytschaever , Marieke Mispelaere , Katleen Raes , Paco Hulpiau , Imca Sampers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ISO 11290:2017 method for detecting and enumerating <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> is detailed but labor-intensive. To reduce labor, modifications such as using fewer selective media or confirmation tests are often implemented. To ensure modified protocols are as precise as the official ISO 11290:2017, they must (or should) be validated against this standard according to ISO 16140. This resulted in numerous validated alternative methods. However, false positives still occur, making it crucial to optimize these labor-efficient protocols. This study aimed to optimize an existing validated labor-efficient culture-based (LECB) protocol consisting of three steps: initial detection on a selective medium, followed by purification of the isolate, and confirmation of the isolate. Screening was conducted on eight false-positive and 13 true-positive <em>L. monocytogenes</em> strains using five selective media and four confirmation tests to identify appropriate culture media and confirmation tests to develop a reliable, optimized LECB protocol. Only RAPID’ L. mono distinguished false from true positives and was incorporated into the optimized protocol, along with the hemolysis test. The optimized LECB protocol was tested in parallel with the original LECB protocol using three stock cultures and 66 fresh presumptive <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and <em>Listeria</em> spp. isolates. Annotated genomes of the eight false-positive and 13 true-positive isolates were screened for genes linked to agar and test selectivity. Quantitative PCR was also evaluated as an alternative confirmation method. This study demonstrates an approach for optimizing validated protocols, although full ISO 16140 validation remains necessary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Control\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095671352500605X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095671352500605X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ISO 11290:2017检测和枚举单核细胞增生李斯特菌的方法详细但劳动密集。为了减少人工,通常会进行一些修改,例如使用较少的选择性介质或确认测试。为了确保修改后的协议与官方ISO 11290:2017一样精确,它们必须(或应该)根据ISO 16140根据该标准进行验证。这产生了许多经过验证的替代方法。然而,误报仍然会发生,因此优化这些劳动效率高的协议至关重要。本研究旨在优化现有的经验证的劳动效率高的基于培养(LECB)的方案,该方案包括三个步骤:在选择性培养基上进行初始检测,随后分离物纯化,并确认分离物。采用5种选择培养基和4种确认试验对8株假阳性和13株真阳性单核增生乳杆菌进行筛选,以确定合适的培养基和确认试验,制定可靠、优化的LECB方案。只有RAPID L. mono区分假阳性和真阳性,并与溶血试验一起纳入优化方案。优化后的LECB方案与最初的LECB方案并行进行了试验,分别使用3个砧木培养物和66株推测为单核增生李斯特菌和李斯特菌的新鲜分离株。对8个假阳性和13个真阳性分离株的注释基因组进行了琼脂相关基因和测试选择性筛选。定量PCR也被评价为一种替代的确认方法。本研究展示了一种优化已验证协议的方法,尽管完整的ISO 16140验证仍然是必要的。
Optimization of a validated labor-efficient culture-based protocol to decrease false positives in Listeria monocytogenes detection
The ISO 11290:2017 method for detecting and enumerating Listeria monocytogenes is detailed but labor-intensive. To reduce labor, modifications such as using fewer selective media or confirmation tests are often implemented. To ensure modified protocols are as precise as the official ISO 11290:2017, they must (or should) be validated against this standard according to ISO 16140. This resulted in numerous validated alternative methods. However, false positives still occur, making it crucial to optimize these labor-efficient protocols. This study aimed to optimize an existing validated labor-efficient culture-based (LECB) protocol consisting of three steps: initial detection on a selective medium, followed by purification of the isolate, and confirmation of the isolate. Screening was conducted on eight false-positive and 13 true-positive L. monocytogenes strains using five selective media and four confirmation tests to identify appropriate culture media and confirmation tests to develop a reliable, optimized LECB protocol. Only RAPID’ L. mono distinguished false from true positives and was incorporated into the optimized protocol, along with the hemolysis test. The optimized LECB protocol was tested in parallel with the original LECB protocol using three stock cultures and 66 fresh presumptive L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. isolates. Annotated genomes of the eight false-positive and 13 true-positive isolates were screened for genes linked to agar and test selectivity. Quantitative PCR was also evaluated as an alternative confirmation method. This study demonstrates an approach for optimizing validated protocols, although full ISO 16140 validation remains necessary.
期刊介绍:
Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control.
Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods:
• Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems
• Mycotoxins
• Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives
• Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards
• Quality assurance
• Good manufacturing practices
• Food process systems design and control
• Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods
• Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology
• Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization
• Consumer issues
• Education, training and research needs.
The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.