Qi Xia , Qian Liu , Ahmed Tlili , Thomas K.F. Chiu
{"title":"系统综述了利用生成式人工智能设计自我调节学习的相关文献及未来研究方向","authors":"Qi Xia , Qian Liu , Ahmed Tlili , Thomas K.F. Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A growing body of research suggests that generative AI (GenAI) can significantly enhance self-regulated learning (SRL) through its immediacy and interactivity. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including the lack of clarity regarding the mechanisms by which generative AI influences SRL, as well as the difficulties teachers encounter when trying to incorporate it into their classrooms. This systematic review study investigates how to design SRL activities using GenAI. We examined 73 articles published over the past five years, drawn from four databases: Web of Science, ProQuest, ERIC, and Scopus. This study has three major empirical findings. First, six pedagogical affordances from GenAI across the three phases of SRL—forethought, Performance, and self-reflection—are (i) creating personalized learning objectives; (ii) searching for, analyzing, and integrating resources; (iii) monitoring and evaluating progress; (iv) recommending learning strategies; (v) recording progress and providing feedback; and (vi) generating new ideas and examples. Second, popular student learning activities using GenAI in each phase are information searching in the forethought; strategies for problem-solving in the performance, and obtaining feedback and conducting self-assessments in the self-reflection. Third, two major dimensions influencing student engagement in SRL using GenAI are individual and environmental. Finally, we visualize how the three empirical findings relate to each other. Our findings help us understand how AI as a human-machine collaborative tool affects the SRL process. This study provides practical recommendations for facilitating SRL in GenAI-enhanced environments and offers guidance for the design and development of personalized GenAI learning tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 105465"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review on designing self-regulated learning using generative artificial intelligence and its future research directions\",\"authors\":\"Qi Xia , Qian Liu , Ahmed Tlili , Thomas K.F. Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A growing body of research suggests that generative AI (GenAI) can significantly enhance self-regulated learning (SRL) through its immediacy and interactivity. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including the lack of clarity regarding the mechanisms by which generative AI influences SRL, as well as the difficulties teachers encounter when trying to incorporate it into their classrooms. This systematic review study investigates how to design SRL activities using GenAI. We examined 73 articles published over the past five years, drawn from four databases: Web of Science, ProQuest, ERIC, and Scopus. This study has three major empirical findings. First, six pedagogical affordances from GenAI across the three phases of SRL—forethought, Performance, and self-reflection—are (i) creating personalized learning objectives; (ii) searching for, analyzing, and integrating resources; (iii) monitoring and evaluating progress; (iv) recommending learning strategies; (v) recording progress and providing feedback; and (vi) generating new ideas and examples. Second, popular student learning activities using GenAI in each phase are information searching in the forethought; strategies for problem-solving in the performance, and obtaining feedback and conducting self-assessments in the self-reflection. Third, two major dimensions influencing student engagement in SRL using GenAI are individual and environmental. Finally, we visualize how the three empirical findings relate to each other. Our findings help us understand how AI as a human-machine collaborative tool affects the SRL process. This study provides practical recommendations for facilitating SRL in GenAI-enhanced environments and offers guidance for the design and development of personalized GenAI learning tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525002337\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525002337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的研究表明,生成式人工智能(GenAI)可以通过其即时性和交互性显著增强自我调节学习(SRL)。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括生成人工智能影响SRL的机制缺乏明确性,以及教师在试图将其纳入课堂时遇到的困难。本系统综述研究探讨了如何使用GenAI设计SRL活动。我们从Web of Science、ProQuest、ERIC和Scopus这四个数据库中选取了过去五年发表的73篇文章。本研究有三个主要的实证发现。首先,GenAI在srl的三个阶段(预见、表现和自我反思)中的六个教学启示是:(1)创建个性化的学习目标;(二)资源查找、分析、整合;监测和评价进展情况;(四)推荐学习策略;(v)记录进度并提供反馈;(六)产生新的想法和例子。第二,GenAI在各个阶段的流行的学生学习活动是预先的信息搜索;在绩效中解决问题的策略,在自我反思中获得反馈并进行自我评估。第三,影响学生在使用GenAI的SRL中投入的两个主要维度是个人和环境。最后,我们可视化三个实证结果如何相互关联。我们的发现有助于我们理解人工智能作为人机协作工具如何影响SRL过程。本研究为促进GenAI增强环境下的SRL提供了实用建议,并为个性化GenAI学习工具的设计和开发提供了指导。
A systematic literature review on designing self-regulated learning using generative artificial intelligence and its future research directions
A growing body of research suggests that generative AI (GenAI) can significantly enhance self-regulated learning (SRL) through its immediacy and interactivity. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including the lack of clarity regarding the mechanisms by which generative AI influences SRL, as well as the difficulties teachers encounter when trying to incorporate it into their classrooms. This systematic review study investigates how to design SRL activities using GenAI. We examined 73 articles published over the past five years, drawn from four databases: Web of Science, ProQuest, ERIC, and Scopus. This study has three major empirical findings. First, six pedagogical affordances from GenAI across the three phases of SRL—forethought, Performance, and self-reflection—are (i) creating personalized learning objectives; (ii) searching for, analyzing, and integrating resources; (iii) monitoring and evaluating progress; (iv) recommending learning strategies; (v) recording progress and providing feedback; and (vi) generating new ideas and examples. Second, popular student learning activities using GenAI in each phase are information searching in the forethought; strategies for problem-solving in the performance, and obtaining feedback and conducting self-assessments in the self-reflection. Third, two major dimensions influencing student engagement in SRL using GenAI are individual and environmental. Finally, we visualize how the three empirical findings relate to each other. Our findings help us understand how AI as a human-machine collaborative tool affects the SRL process. This study provides practical recommendations for facilitating SRL in GenAI-enhanced environments and offers guidance for the design and development of personalized GenAI learning tools.
期刊介绍:
Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.