泥炭地的多代古生态学研究:近期进展和未来发展的综合综述

IF 10 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mariusz Lamentowicz , Luke Andrews , Sambor Czerwiński , Katarzyna Marcisz
{"title":"泥炭地的多代古生态学研究:近期进展和未来发展的综合综述","authors":"Mariusz Lamentowicz ,&nbsp;Luke Andrews ,&nbsp;Sambor Czerwiński ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Marcisz","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multi-proxy approaches in palaeoecological studies have gained prominence due to their ability to provide comprehensive insights into palaeoenvironmental changes. This method enhances the complexity and richness of environmental reconstructions by integrating various proxies, such as testate amoebae, pollen, plant macrofossils, charcoal, and stable isotopes. While synthesising these records can be challenging, due both to their complexity and varying journal guidelines for publication, it remains essential for a more precise understanding of past ecosystems. Multi-proxy studies are invaluable for cross-referencing local to extra-local data with proxies from nearby areas, thus validating palaeoclimatic records and minimising speculative conclusions. The approach reveals significant human impacts on ecosystems, particularly peatlands, serving as natural archives for historical environmental and anthropogenic activities. Integrating diverse methodologies from ecology, palaeoecology, archaeology, and history with high-resolution palaeoecological data offers profound insights into settlement patterns, economic development, and historical demography. Despite the challenges of handling extensive datasets, advanced statistical methods enable meaningful interpretations while maintaining the integrity of the data. Historical records enrich the understanding of human and climatic impacts upon a range of peatland ecosystems. By reconstructing long-term changes in food webs through peat records, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of past ecosystem structures and functions, thereby paving the way for future ecological advances. Though underutilised in archaeological and historical contexts, this interdisciplinary approach has significant potential across various academic fields, emphasising the importance of integrating comprehensive datasets to approach complex ecological questions and inform ecological restoration. This review presents the potential of high-resolution, multi-proxy studies of peatlands, shows examples of such studies and summarises best practices and key considerations for conducting such research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 105278"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-proxy palaeoecological studies from peatlands: a comprehensive review of recent advances and future developments\",\"authors\":\"Mariusz Lamentowicz ,&nbsp;Luke Andrews ,&nbsp;Sambor Czerwiński ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Marcisz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Multi-proxy approaches in palaeoecological studies have gained prominence due to their ability to provide comprehensive insights into palaeoenvironmental changes. This method enhances the complexity and richness of environmental reconstructions by integrating various proxies, such as testate amoebae, pollen, plant macrofossils, charcoal, and stable isotopes. While synthesising these records can be challenging, due both to their complexity and varying journal guidelines for publication, it remains essential for a more precise understanding of past ecosystems. Multi-proxy studies are invaluable for cross-referencing local to extra-local data with proxies from nearby areas, thus validating palaeoclimatic records and minimising speculative conclusions. The approach reveals significant human impacts on ecosystems, particularly peatlands, serving as natural archives for historical environmental and anthropogenic activities. Integrating diverse methodologies from ecology, palaeoecology, archaeology, and history with high-resolution palaeoecological data offers profound insights into settlement patterns, economic development, and historical demography. Despite the challenges of handling extensive datasets, advanced statistical methods enable meaningful interpretations while maintaining the integrity of the data. Historical records enrich the understanding of human and climatic impacts upon a range of peatland ecosystems. By reconstructing long-term changes in food webs through peat records, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of past ecosystem structures and functions, thereby paving the way for future ecological advances. Though underutilised in archaeological and historical contexts, this interdisciplinary approach has significant potential across various academic fields, emphasising the importance of integrating comprehensive datasets to approach complex ecological questions and inform ecological restoration. This review presents the potential of high-resolution, multi-proxy studies of peatlands, shows examples of such studies and summarises best practices and key considerations for conducting such research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"271 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825225002399\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825225002399","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多代理方法在古生态学研究中获得了突出的地位,因为它们能够提供对古环境变化的全面认识。该方法通过整合遗属变形虫、花粉、植物大化石、木炭和稳定同位素等多种指标,提高了环境重建的复杂性和丰富性。虽然由于这些记录的复杂性和不同的期刊发表指南,综合这些记录可能具有挑战性,但它对于更精确地了解过去的生态系统仍然至关重要。多代理研究对于将本地和外地数据与附近地区的代理进行交叉参考是非常宝贵的,从而验证古气候记录并最大限度地减少推测性结论。该方法揭示了人类对生态系统的重大影响,特别是泥炭地,作为历史环境和人为活动的自然档案。将生态学、古生态学、考古学和历史学的多种方法与高分辨率的古生态学数据相结合,可以深入了解聚落模式、经济发展和历史人口统计学。尽管处理大量数据集面临挑战,但先进的统计方法可以在保持数据完整性的同时进行有意义的解释。历史记录丰富了人类和气候对一系列泥炭地生态系统影响的认识。通过泥炭记录重建食物网的长期变化,研究人员可以更深入地了解过去的生态系统结构和功能,从而为未来的生态进步铺平道路。虽然在考古和历史背景下未得到充分利用,但这种跨学科的方法在各个学术领域具有巨大的潜力,强调了整合综合数据集处理复杂生态问题和为生态恢复提供信息的重要性。本综述介绍了泥炭地高分辨率、多代理研究的潜力,展示了此类研究的实例,并总结了开展此类研究的最佳做法和关键考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-proxy palaeoecological studies from peatlands: a comprehensive review of recent advances and future developments
Multi-proxy approaches in palaeoecological studies have gained prominence due to their ability to provide comprehensive insights into palaeoenvironmental changes. This method enhances the complexity and richness of environmental reconstructions by integrating various proxies, such as testate amoebae, pollen, plant macrofossils, charcoal, and stable isotopes. While synthesising these records can be challenging, due both to their complexity and varying journal guidelines for publication, it remains essential for a more precise understanding of past ecosystems. Multi-proxy studies are invaluable for cross-referencing local to extra-local data with proxies from nearby areas, thus validating palaeoclimatic records and minimising speculative conclusions. The approach reveals significant human impacts on ecosystems, particularly peatlands, serving as natural archives for historical environmental and anthropogenic activities. Integrating diverse methodologies from ecology, palaeoecology, archaeology, and history with high-resolution palaeoecological data offers profound insights into settlement patterns, economic development, and historical demography. Despite the challenges of handling extensive datasets, advanced statistical methods enable meaningful interpretations while maintaining the integrity of the data. Historical records enrich the understanding of human and climatic impacts upon a range of peatland ecosystems. By reconstructing long-term changes in food webs through peat records, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of past ecosystem structures and functions, thereby paving the way for future ecological advances. Though underutilised in archaeological and historical contexts, this interdisciplinary approach has significant potential across various academic fields, emphasising the importance of integrating comprehensive datasets to approach complex ecological questions and inform ecological restoration. This review presents the potential of high-resolution, multi-proxy studies of peatlands, shows examples of such studies and summarises best practices and key considerations for conducting such research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信