可持续性逻辑和运营目标:一项实验研究

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ayşe Kocabıyıkoğlu, Celile Itır Göğüş, Ozan Duygulu, Kemal Berkay Tüzün
{"title":"可持续性逻辑和运营目标:一项实验研究","authors":"Ayşe Kocabıyıkoğlu,&nbsp;Celile Itır Göğüş,&nbsp;Ozan Duygulu,&nbsp;Kemal Berkay Tüzün","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The tensions among the three pillars of sustainability – economic, environmental, and social – pose significant challenges for organizational decision making. We examine how goal setting, goal difficulty, goal specificity, and organizational sustainability logic shape operations decisions and sustainability outcomes amid these trade-offs, using vignette-based experiments. We observe that a sustainability logic that emphasizes all dimensions of sustainability may not, on its own, improve environmental outcomes, suggesting its impact might be strengthened if coupled with concrete, actionable levers – such as goal setting – that operationalize and signal sustainability commitments within decision making processes. Setting environmental performance goals alongside traditional financial objectives emerges as a key lever in our study for promoting pro-environmental behavior, with the characteristics of these goals and their alignment with the organization’s dominant sustainability logic playing a critical role. Our findings highlight the need to strategically configure goal mechanisms to navigate sustainability tensions effectively and offer practical guidance for embedding sustainability into operations decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115736"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability logic and goals in operations: An experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Kocabıyıkoğlu,&nbsp;Celile Itır Göğüş,&nbsp;Ozan Duygulu,&nbsp;Kemal Berkay Tüzün\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The tensions among the three pillars of sustainability – economic, environmental, and social – pose significant challenges for organizational decision making. We examine how goal setting, goal difficulty, goal specificity, and organizational sustainability logic shape operations decisions and sustainability outcomes amid these trade-offs, using vignette-based experiments. We observe that a sustainability logic that emphasizes all dimensions of sustainability may not, on its own, improve environmental outcomes, suggesting its impact might be strengthened if coupled with concrete, actionable levers – such as goal setting – that operationalize and signal sustainability commitments within decision making processes. Setting environmental performance goals alongside traditional financial objectives emerges as a key lever in our study for promoting pro-environmental behavior, with the characteristics of these goals and their alignment with the organization’s dominant sustainability logic playing a critical role. Our findings highlight the need to strategically configure goal mechanisms to navigate sustainability tensions effectively and offer practical guidance for embedding sustainability into operations decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005594\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展的三大支柱——经济、环境和社会——之间的紧张关系对组织决策提出了重大挑战。我们研究了目标设定、目标难度、目标特异性和组织可持续性逻辑如何在这些权衡中塑造运营决策和可持续性结果,使用基于图像的实验。我们观察到,强调可持续性所有维度的可持续性逻辑本身可能不会改善环境结果,这表明,如果与具体的、可操作的杠杆(如目标设定)相结合,在决策过程中实施和表明可持续性承诺,其影响可能会得到加强。在我们的研究中,与传统财务目标一起设定环境绩效目标是促进亲环境行为的关键杠杆,这些目标的特征及其与组织主导的可持续性逻辑的一致性起着关键作用。我们的研究结果强调需要战略性地配置目标机制,以有效地应对可持续性紧张局势,并为将可持续性纳入运营决策提供实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability logic and goals in operations: An experimental study
The tensions among the three pillars of sustainability – economic, environmental, and social – pose significant challenges for organizational decision making. We examine how goal setting, goal difficulty, goal specificity, and organizational sustainability logic shape operations decisions and sustainability outcomes amid these trade-offs, using vignette-based experiments. We observe that a sustainability logic that emphasizes all dimensions of sustainability may not, on its own, improve environmental outcomes, suggesting its impact might be strengthened if coupled with concrete, actionable levers – such as goal setting – that operationalize and signal sustainability commitments within decision making processes. Setting environmental performance goals alongside traditional financial objectives emerges as a key lever in our study for promoting pro-environmental behavior, with the characteristics of these goals and their alignment with the organization’s dominant sustainability logic playing a critical role. Our findings highlight the need to strategically configure goal mechanisms to navigate sustainability tensions effectively and offer practical guidance for embedding sustainability into operations decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信