Thi-Phuong Nguyen , Paul C. Struik , Kees Swaans , Huong Thi Mai Pham , The Ky Hoang , Deborah Nabuuma , Tjeerd-Jan Stomph
{"title":"越南北部的家庭蔬菜农业生物多样性需要种子来源的多样性","authors":"Thi-Phuong Nguyen , Paul C. Struik , Kees Swaans , Huong Thi Mai Pham , The Ky Hoang , Deborah Nabuuma , Tjeerd-Jan Stomph","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Despite increasing interest in agro-biodiversity, there is little research on the role of diversity in seed sources and related seed systems in supporting vegetable diversity.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We aimed to analyze drivers of vegetable diversity and of farmers' choice of seed sources. Moreover, we explored how vegetable diversity and the use of seed sources were related. We focused on households of communities in northern Vietnam with large vegetable diversity as a case in point.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted 51 stakeholder interviews, 13 focus group discussions, and a survey among 409 households in 32 villages in 2 contrasting regions. Vegetable diversity was defined as counts of unique vegetables. Bayesian mixed-effect models were used to elucidate which factors influenced vegetable diversity at household level, and farmers' seed sourcing decisions.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>On average, households grew 8 (range 1–27) vegetables and used 2 (range 1–6) seed sources. Smaller crop land area resulted in less diversity. Growing more vegetables was associated with women having more years of experience in vegetable production and using more seed sources. Self-saved seed was common, but households relied on off-farm sources for seed that was difficult to produce and/or preserve. Intermediaries created intermediate seed systems, thus linking farmers to formal seed systems.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>As households with larger vegetable diversity used more seed sources, integrated seed sector development should strengthen reliability of all current seed sources to maintain vegetable diversity. This includes reliability of intermediaries and information, and enhancing farmers' capacity for and role in producing and preserving their own seed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104515"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household vegetable agro-biodiversity in northern Vietnam requires diversity in seed sources\",\"authors\":\"Thi-Phuong Nguyen , Paul C. Struik , Kees Swaans , Huong Thi Mai Pham , The Ky Hoang , Deborah Nabuuma , Tjeerd-Jan Stomph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Despite increasing interest in agro-biodiversity, there is little research on the role of diversity in seed sources and related seed systems in supporting vegetable diversity.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We aimed to analyze drivers of vegetable diversity and of farmers' choice of seed sources. Moreover, we explored how vegetable diversity and the use of seed sources were related. We focused on households of communities in northern Vietnam with large vegetable diversity as a case in point.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted 51 stakeholder interviews, 13 focus group discussions, and a survey among 409 households in 32 villages in 2 contrasting regions. Vegetable diversity was defined as counts of unique vegetables. Bayesian mixed-effect models were used to elucidate which factors influenced vegetable diversity at household level, and farmers' seed sourcing decisions.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>On average, households grew 8 (range 1–27) vegetables and used 2 (range 1–6) seed sources. Smaller crop land area resulted in less diversity. Growing more vegetables was associated with women having more years of experience in vegetable production and using more seed sources. Self-saved seed was common, but households relied on off-farm sources for seed that was difficult to produce and/or preserve. Intermediaries created intermediate seed systems, thus linking farmers to formal seed systems.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>As households with larger vegetable diversity used more seed sources, integrated seed sector development should strengthen reliability of all current seed sources to maintain vegetable diversity. This includes reliability of intermediaries and information, and enhancing farmers' capacity for and role in producing and preserving their own seed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"231 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25002550\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25002550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Household vegetable agro-biodiversity in northern Vietnam requires diversity in seed sources
CONTEXT
Despite increasing interest in agro-biodiversity, there is little research on the role of diversity in seed sources and related seed systems in supporting vegetable diversity.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to analyze drivers of vegetable diversity and of farmers' choice of seed sources. Moreover, we explored how vegetable diversity and the use of seed sources were related. We focused on households of communities in northern Vietnam with large vegetable diversity as a case in point.
METHODS
We conducted 51 stakeholder interviews, 13 focus group discussions, and a survey among 409 households in 32 villages in 2 contrasting regions. Vegetable diversity was defined as counts of unique vegetables. Bayesian mixed-effect models were used to elucidate which factors influenced vegetable diversity at household level, and farmers' seed sourcing decisions.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
On average, households grew 8 (range 1–27) vegetables and used 2 (range 1–6) seed sources. Smaller crop land area resulted in less diversity. Growing more vegetables was associated with women having more years of experience in vegetable production and using more seed sources. Self-saved seed was common, but households relied on off-farm sources for seed that was difficult to produce and/or preserve. Intermediaries created intermediate seed systems, thus linking farmers to formal seed systems.
SIGNIFICANCE
As households with larger vegetable diversity used more seed sources, integrated seed sector development should strengthen reliability of all current seed sources to maintain vegetable diversity. This includes reliability of intermediaries and information, and enhancing farmers' capacity for and role in producing and preserving their own seed.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.