Abouzar Jafari , Mostafa Mollaali , Lingyue Ma , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Ying Zhou , Roberto Dugnani
{"title":"考虑可靠性的XML脆性断裂强度预测","authors":"Abouzar Jafari , Mostafa Mollaali , Lingyue Ma , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Ying Zhou , Roberto Dugnani","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based framework for predicting the brittle fracture strength of glass and ceramic materials in tension and flexure. Traditional empirical methods rely on subjective interpretations and oversimplified formulas that overlook critical factors such as specimen geometry, residual stresses, elastic properties, and microstructural heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent and unreliable strength estimates. To overcome these limitations, this research utilizes a dataset of over 4,600 fractured specimens spanning 44 brittle material types and employs both single and ensemble ML algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two approaches are proposed: (i) Practical Solution (PS) derived from a simplified MLP architecture, offering explicit mathematical equations for ease of use, and (ii) high-accuracy Model-Based Solution (MBS) integrated into a user-friendly GUI. The results demonstrate that LightGBM outperforms empirical methods, PS, and other MBS, achieving superior predictive accuracy with lower RMSE and MAE, along with higher correlation coefficient across different material types and loading conditions. Specifically, for glass or glass-like (glass) in flexure, the LightGBM model achieved RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficient values of 0.07, 0.044, and 0.98, respectively, compared to 0.116, 0.078, and 0.93 for the PS and 0.210, 0.170, and 0.93 for empirical solutions. Similar trends were observed for other cases, with non-glass (ceramic) materials exhibiting slightly lower accuracy due to their complex microstructure and the inherent challenges in fracture surface interpretation. A reliability analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) confirmed that ensemble ML solutions provide robust and generalizable predictions across varying input conditions, while PS, though more conservative, exhibits lower predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis via SHAP revealed that the non-dimensional parameter <span><math><msqrt><mrow><mi>t</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></msqrt></math></span> (where <span><math><mi>t</mi></math></span> is the thickness of the plate or the diameter of the rod, and <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> is the mirror radius) is the most influential factor in fracture strength prediction, consistent with classical fracture mechanics. For further validation of the developed ML-based solutions, additional experimental studies were conducted, confirming both their accuracy and practical applicability in engineering applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 111555"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brittle fracture strength prediction via XML with reliability considerations\",\"authors\":\"Abouzar Jafari , Mostafa Mollaali , Lingyue Ma , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Ying Zhou , Roberto Dugnani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based framework for predicting the brittle fracture strength of glass and ceramic materials in tension and flexure. Traditional empirical methods rely on subjective interpretations and oversimplified formulas that overlook critical factors such as specimen geometry, residual stresses, elastic properties, and microstructural heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent and unreliable strength estimates. To overcome these limitations, this research utilizes a dataset of over 4,600 fractured specimens spanning 44 brittle material types and employs both single and ensemble ML algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two approaches are proposed: (i) Practical Solution (PS) derived from a simplified MLP architecture, offering explicit mathematical equations for ease of use, and (ii) high-accuracy Model-Based Solution (MBS) integrated into a user-friendly GUI. The results demonstrate that LightGBM outperforms empirical methods, PS, and other MBS, achieving superior predictive accuracy with lower RMSE and MAE, along with higher correlation coefficient across different material types and loading conditions. Specifically, for glass or glass-like (glass) in flexure, the LightGBM model achieved RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficient values of 0.07, 0.044, and 0.98, respectively, compared to 0.116, 0.078, and 0.93 for the PS and 0.210, 0.170, and 0.93 for empirical solutions. Similar trends were observed for other cases, with non-glass (ceramic) materials exhibiting slightly lower accuracy due to their complex microstructure and the inherent challenges in fracture surface interpretation. A reliability analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) confirmed that ensemble ML solutions provide robust and generalizable predictions across varying input conditions, while PS, though more conservative, exhibits lower predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis via SHAP revealed that the non-dimensional parameter <span><math><msqrt><mrow><mi>t</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></msqrt></math></span> (where <span><math><mi>t</mi></math></span> is the thickness of the plate or the diameter of the rod, and <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> is the mirror radius) is the most influential factor in fracture strength prediction, consistent with classical fracture mechanics. For further validation of the developed ML-based solutions, additional experimental studies were conducted, confirming both their accuracy and practical applicability in engineering applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"328 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425007568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425007568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brittle fracture strength prediction via XML with reliability considerations
This study presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based framework for predicting the brittle fracture strength of glass and ceramic materials in tension and flexure. Traditional empirical methods rely on subjective interpretations and oversimplified formulas that overlook critical factors such as specimen geometry, residual stresses, elastic properties, and microstructural heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent and unreliable strength estimates. To overcome these limitations, this research utilizes a dataset of over 4,600 fractured specimens spanning 44 brittle material types and employs both single and ensemble ML algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two approaches are proposed: (i) Practical Solution (PS) derived from a simplified MLP architecture, offering explicit mathematical equations for ease of use, and (ii) high-accuracy Model-Based Solution (MBS) integrated into a user-friendly GUI. The results demonstrate that LightGBM outperforms empirical methods, PS, and other MBS, achieving superior predictive accuracy with lower RMSE and MAE, along with higher correlation coefficient across different material types and loading conditions. Specifically, for glass or glass-like (glass) in flexure, the LightGBM model achieved RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficient values of 0.07, 0.044, and 0.98, respectively, compared to 0.116, 0.078, and 0.93 for the PS and 0.210, 0.170, and 0.93 for empirical solutions. Similar trends were observed for other cases, with non-glass (ceramic) materials exhibiting slightly lower accuracy due to their complex microstructure and the inherent challenges in fracture surface interpretation. A reliability analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) confirmed that ensemble ML solutions provide robust and generalizable predictions across varying input conditions, while PS, though more conservative, exhibits lower predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis via SHAP revealed that the non-dimensional parameter (where is the thickness of the plate or the diameter of the rod, and is the mirror radius) is the most influential factor in fracture strength prediction, consistent with classical fracture mechanics. For further validation of the developed ML-based solutions, additional experimental studies were conducted, confirming both their accuracy and practical applicability in engineering applications.
期刊介绍:
EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.