考虑可靠性的XML脆性断裂强度预测

IF 5.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Abouzar Jafari , Mostafa Mollaali , Lingyue Ma , Amir Ali Shahmansouri , Ying Zhou , Roberto Dugnani
{"title":"考虑可靠性的XML脆性断裂强度预测","authors":"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Mostafa Mollaali ,&nbsp;Lingyue Ma ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Roberto Dugnani","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based framework for predicting the brittle fracture strength of glass and ceramic materials in tension and flexure. Traditional empirical methods rely on subjective interpretations and oversimplified formulas that overlook critical factors such as specimen geometry, residual stresses, elastic properties, and microstructural heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent and unreliable strength estimates. To overcome these limitations, this research utilizes a dataset of over 4,600 fractured specimens spanning 44 brittle material types and employs both single and ensemble ML algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two approaches are proposed: (i) Practical Solution (PS) derived from a simplified MLP architecture, offering explicit mathematical equations for ease of use, and (ii) high-accuracy Model-Based Solution (MBS) integrated into a user-friendly GUI. The results demonstrate that LightGBM outperforms empirical methods, PS, and other MBS, achieving superior predictive accuracy with lower RMSE and MAE, along with higher correlation coefficient across different material types and loading conditions. Specifically, for glass or glass-like (glass) in flexure, the LightGBM model achieved RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficient values of 0.07, 0.044, and 0.98, respectively, compared to 0.116, 0.078, and 0.93 for the PS and 0.210, 0.170, and 0.93 for empirical solutions. Similar trends were observed for other cases, with non-glass (ceramic) materials exhibiting slightly lower accuracy due to their complex microstructure and the inherent challenges in fracture surface interpretation. A reliability analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) confirmed that ensemble ML solutions provide robust and generalizable predictions across varying input conditions, while PS, though more conservative, exhibits lower predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis via SHAP revealed that the non-dimensional parameter <span><math><msqrt><mrow><mi>t</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></msqrt></math></span> (where <span><math><mi>t</mi></math></span> is the thickness of the plate or the diameter of the rod, and <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> is the mirror radius) is the most influential factor in fracture strength prediction, consistent with classical fracture mechanics. For further validation of the developed ML-based solutions, additional experimental studies were conducted, confirming both their accuracy and practical applicability in engineering applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 111555"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brittle fracture strength prediction via XML with reliability considerations\",\"authors\":\"Abouzar Jafari ,&nbsp;Mostafa Mollaali ,&nbsp;Lingyue Ma ,&nbsp;Amir Ali Shahmansouri ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Roberto Dugnani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based framework for predicting the brittle fracture strength of glass and ceramic materials in tension and flexure. Traditional empirical methods rely on subjective interpretations and oversimplified formulas that overlook critical factors such as specimen geometry, residual stresses, elastic properties, and microstructural heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent and unreliable strength estimates. To overcome these limitations, this research utilizes a dataset of over 4,600 fractured specimens spanning 44 brittle material types and employs both single and ensemble ML algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two approaches are proposed: (i) Practical Solution (PS) derived from a simplified MLP architecture, offering explicit mathematical equations for ease of use, and (ii) high-accuracy Model-Based Solution (MBS) integrated into a user-friendly GUI. The results demonstrate that LightGBM outperforms empirical methods, PS, and other MBS, achieving superior predictive accuracy with lower RMSE and MAE, along with higher correlation coefficient across different material types and loading conditions. Specifically, for glass or glass-like (glass) in flexure, the LightGBM model achieved RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficient values of 0.07, 0.044, and 0.98, respectively, compared to 0.116, 0.078, and 0.93 for the PS and 0.210, 0.170, and 0.93 for empirical solutions. Similar trends were observed for other cases, with non-glass (ceramic) materials exhibiting slightly lower accuracy due to their complex microstructure and the inherent challenges in fracture surface interpretation. A reliability analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) confirmed that ensemble ML solutions provide robust and generalizable predictions across varying input conditions, while PS, though more conservative, exhibits lower predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis via SHAP revealed that the non-dimensional parameter <span><math><msqrt><mrow><mi>t</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>R</mi></mrow></msqrt></math></span> (where <span><math><mi>t</mi></math></span> is the thickness of the plate or the diameter of the rod, and <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> is the mirror radius) is the most influential factor in fracture strength prediction, consistent with classical fracture mechanics. For further validation of the developed ML-based solutions, additional experimental studies were conducted, confirming both their accuracy and practical applicability in engineering applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"328 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425007568\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425007568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一个基于机器学习(ML)的框架,用于预测玻璃和陶瓷材料在拉伸和弯曲下的脆性断裂强度。传统的经验方法依赖于主观解释和过于简化的公式,忽略了关键因素,如试样几何形状、残余应力、弹性特性和微观结构非均质性,导致强度估计不一致和不可靠。为了克服这些限制,本研究利用了超过4600个断裂样本的数据集,涵盖44种脆性材料类型,并采用了单个和集成ML算法,包括多层感知器(MLP)、XGBoost和LightGBM。提出了两种方法:(i)从简化的MLP架构派生的实用解决方案(PS),提供明确的数学方程以方便使用;(ii)高精度的基于模型的解决方案(MBS)集成到用户友好的GUI中。结果表明,LightGBM优于经验方法、PS和其他MBS,具有较低的RMSE和MAE,并且在不同材料类型和加载条件下具有较高的相关系数。具体来说,对于弯曲的玻璃或类玻璃(玻璃),LightGBM模型的RMSE、MAE和相关系数分别为0.07、0.044和0.98,而PS模型的RMSE、MAE和相关系数分别为0.116、0.078和0.93,经验解的RMSE、MAE和相关系数分别为0.210、0.170和0.93。在其他情况下也观察到类似的趋势,非玻璃(陶瓷)材料由于其复杂的微观结构和裂缝表面解释的固有挑战,其精度略低。使用蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)的可靠性分析证实,集成ML解决方案在不同的输入条件下提供了鲁棒性和可泛化的预测,而PS虽然更保守,但预测精度较低。特征重要性分析表明,无量纲参数t/R (t为板厚或杆径,R为镜像半径)是断裂强度预测中影响最大的因素,与经典断裂力学一致。为了进一步验证开发的基于ml的解决方案,进行了额外的实验研究,以确认其准确性和在工程应用中的实际适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brittle fracture strength prediction via XML with reliability considerations
This study presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based framework for predicting the brittle fracture strength of glass and ceramic materials in tension and flexure. Traditional empirical methods rely on subjective interpretations and oversimplified formulas that overlook critical factors such as specimen geometry, residual stresses, elastic properties, and microstructural heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent and unreliable strength estimates. To overcome these limitations, this research utilizes a dataset of over 4,600 fractured specimens spanning 44 brittle material types and employs both single and ensemble ML algorithms, including Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Two approaches are proposed: (i) Practical Solution (PS) derived from a simplified MLP architecture, offering explicit mathematical equations for ease of use, and (ii) high-accuracy Model-Based Solution (MBS) integrated into a user-friendly GUI. The results demonstrate that LightGBM outperforms empirical methods, PS, and other MBS, achieving superior predictive accuracy with lower RMSE and MAE, along with higher correlation coefficient across different material types and loading conditions. Specifically, for glass or glass-like (glass) in flexure, the LightGBM model achieved RMSE, MAE, and correlation coefficient values of 0.07, 0.044, and 0.98, respectively, compared to 0.116, 0.078, and 0.93 for the PS and 0.210, 0.170, and 0.93 for empirical solutions. Similar trends were observed for other cases, with non-glass (ceramic) materials exhibiting slightly lower accuracy due to their complex microstructure and the inherent challenges in fracture surface interpretation. A reliability analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) confirmed that ensemble ML solutions provide robust and generalizable predictions across varying input conditions, while PS, though more conservative, exhibits lower predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis via SHAP revealed that the non-dimensional parameter t/R (where t is the thickness of the plate or the diameter of the rod, and R is the mirror radius) is the most influential factor in fracture strength prediction, consistent with classical fracture mechanics. For further validation of the developed ML-based solutions, additional experimental studies were conducted, confirming both their accuracy and practical applicability in engineering applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信