{"title":"投射额区作为游泳主动阻力指标的局限性:关注胫骨和股节段","authors":"Sohei Washino , Akihiko Murai , Tomoya Kadi , Kenzo Narita , Hirotoshi Mankyu , Yasuhide Yoshitake","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The projected frontal area (PFA) is a useful indicator of swimming drag. However, it is inherently limited because it only considers observable frontal areas from a frontal view. To address this limitation, we determined a new indicator, the projected and occluded frontal area (POFA), which includes occluded frontal areas relative to the swimming direction. This study aimed to examine the difference between the PFA and POFA, focusing on the tibial and femoral segments during front crawl. Twelve competitive male swimmers performed a 15-meter front crawl at 1.20 m·s<sup>−1</sup>. The three-dimensional positions of the reflective markers attached to the swimmers’ bodies were collected using an underwater motion-capture system. The body shape of each swimmer was obtained using a body scanner. Two types of digital human models were created: a whole-body model with vertex colors divided into eight body segments and a segment-specific model extracted from the whole-body model. To reconstruct identical motions in both models, the joint angle data obtained through inverse kinematics computations using motion-capture data and the whole-body model were applied to the segment-specific models. The PFA and POFA were determined through image processing of a series of parallel frontal images from whole-body and segment-specific models, respectively. The PFA of the tibial and femoral segments was substantially smaller than the corresponding POFA (<em>p</em> < 0.001), with underestimation ratios of 86.1 % and 42.3 %, respectively. These results suggest that PFA is not a fully reliable indicator for evaluating swimming drag, at least in the tibial and femoral segments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A limitation of projected frontal area as an indicator of active drag in swimming: Focusing on tibial and femoral segments\",\"authors\":\"Sohei Washino , Akihiko Murai , Tomoya Kadi , Kenzo Narita , Hirotoshi Mankyu , Yasuhide Yoshitake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The projected frontal area (PFA) is a useful indicator of swimming drag. However, it is inherently limited because it only considers observable frontal areas from a frontal view. To address this limitation, we determined a new indicator, the projected and occluded frontal area (POFA), which includes occluded frontal areas relative to the swimming direction. This study aimed to examine the difference between the PFA and POFA, focusing on the tibial and femoral segments during front crawl. Twelve competitive male swimmers performed a 15-meter front crawl at 1.20 m·s<sup>−1</sup>. The three-dimensional positions of the reflective markers attached to the swimmers’ bodies were collected using an underwater motion-capture system. The body shape of each swimmer was obtained using a body scanner. Two types of digital human models were created: a whole-body model with vertex colors divided into eight body segments and a segment-specific model extracted from the whole-body model. To reconstruct identical motions in both models, the joint angle data obtained through inverse kinematics computations using motion-capture data and the whole-body model were applied to the segment-specific models. The PFA and POFA were determined through image processing of a series of parallel frontal images from whole-body and segment-specific models, respectively. The PFA of the tibial and femoral segments was substantially smaller than the corresponding POFA (<em>p</em> < 0.001), with underestimation ratios of 86.1 % and 42.3 %, respectively. These results suggest that PFA is not a fully reliable indicator for evaluating swimming drag, at least in the tibial and femoral segments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004841\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A limitation of projected frontal area as an indicator of active drag in swimming: Focusing on tibial and femoral segments
The projected frontal area (PFA) is a useful indicator of swimming drag. However, it is inherently limited because it only considers observable frontal areas from a frontal view. To address this limitation, we determined a new indicator, the projected and occluded frontal area (POFA), which includes occluded frontal areas relative to the swimming direction. This study aimed to examine the difference between the PFA and POFA, focusing on the tibial and femoral segments during front crawl. Twelve competitive male swimmers performed a 15-meter front crawl at 1.20 m·s−1. The three-dimensional positions of the reflective markers attached to the swimmers’ bodies were collected using an underwater motion-capture system. The body shape of each swimmer was obtained using a body scanner. Two types of digital human models were created: a whole-body model with vertex colors divided into eight body segments and a segment-specific model extracted from the whole-body model. To reconstruct identical motions in both models, the joint angle data obtained through inverse kinematics computations using motion-capture data and the whole-body model were applied to the segment-specific models. The PFA and POFA were determined through image processing of a series of parallel frontal images from whole-body and segment-specific models, respectively. The PFA of the tibial and femoral segments was substantially smaller than the corresponding POFA (p < 0.001), with underestimation ratios of 86.1 % and 42.3 %, respectively. These results suggest that PFA is not a fully reliable indicator for evaluating swimming drag, at least in the tibial and femoral segments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.