病因不明的晚发性癫痫组比脑血管病组更容易出现癫痫样脑电图异常

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Akihiko Nakaya , Kazuhiro Kato , Kazutaka Jin , Satoru Ohtomo , Nobukazu Nakasato , Masashi Aoki
{"title":"病因不明的晚发性癫痫组比脑血管病组更容易出现癫痫样脑电图异常","authors":"Akihiko Nakaya ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Kato ,&nbsp;Kazutaka Jin ,&nbsp;Satoru Ohtomo ,&nbsp;Nobukazu Nakasato ,&nbsp;Masashi Aoki","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether the cerebrovascular disease (CVD) group of late-onset epilepsy shows lower detection rates of interictal and ictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) using routine EEG than other etiology groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had first seizure at age 65 years or older. The detection of EAs was investigated as well as background factors including age at EEG, timing of EEG after the last seizure, recording time of EEG, EEG-vigilance, and antiseizure medications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the detection rate of EAs between etiologies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EAs were detected in 53 (27 %) of 196 patients with late-onset epilepsy: 17 (20.7 %) of 82 patients with CVD, 9 (29.0 %) of 31 with traumatic brain injury, 4 (23.5 %) of 17 with other structural etiologies, 1 (20.0 %) of 5 with metabolic etiology, 9 (28.1 %) of 32 with dementia, and 13 (44.8 %) of 29 with unknown etiology. The odds ratios for EA detection, using the CVD group as the reference, were 1.60 for traumatic brain injury, 1.32 for other structural etiologies, 0.98 for metabolic etiology, 1.57 for dementia, and 4.10 for unknown etiology. The unknown etiology group showed significantly higher detection rate than the CVD group (<em>p</em> = 0.010).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The higher detection rate in the unknown etiology group may indicate the presence of latent etiologies with high epileptic activity, while the lower detection rate in the CVD group may reflect electrophysiologically inactive lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 110721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unknown etiology group of late onset epilepsy more likely to show epileptiform EEG abnormalities than cerebrovascular disease group\",\"authors\":\"Akihiko Nakaya ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Kato ,&nbsp;Kazutaka Jin ,&nbsp;Satoru Ohtomo ,&nbsp;Nobukazu Nakasato ,&nbsp;Masashi Aoki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether the cerebrovascular disease (CVD) group of late-onset epilepsy shows lower detection rates of interictal and ictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) using routine EEG than other etiology groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had first seizure at age 65 years or older. The detection of EAs was investigated as well as background factors including age at EEG, timing of EEG after the last seizure, recording time of EEG, EEG-vigilance, and antiseizure medications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the detection rate of EAs between etiologies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EAs were detected in 53 (27 %) of 196 patients with late-onset epilepsy: 17 (20.7 %) of 82 patients with CVD, 9 (29.0 %) of 31 with traumatic brain injury, 4 (23.5 %) of 17 with other structural etiologies, 1 (20.0 %) of 5 with metabolic etiology, 9 (28.1 %) of 32 with dementia, and 13 (44.8 %) of 29 with unknown etiology. The odds ratios for EA detection, using the CVD group as the reference, were 1.60 for traumatic brain injury, 1.32 for other structural etiologies, 0.98 for metabolic etiology, 1.57 for dementia, and 4.10 for unknown etiology. The unknown etiology group showed significantly higher detection rate than the CVD group (<em>p</em> = 0.010).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The higher detection rate in the unknown etiology group may indicate the presence of latent etiologies with high epileptic activity, while the lower detection rate in the CVD group may reflect electrophysiologically inactive lesions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004615\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨脑血管病(CVD)组迟发性癫痫间期及发作期癫痫样异常(EAs)的常规脑电图检出率是否低于其他病因组。方法回顾性分析65岁及以上首次发作的连续患者。观察ea的检测情况及背景因素包括脑电图年龄、最后一次癫痫发作后的脑电图时间、脑电图记录时间、脑电图警惕性、抗癫痫药物等。采用多变量logistic回归分析比较不同病因间ea的检出率。结果196例迟发性癫痫患者中有53例(27%)检出sea, 82例CVD患者中有17例(20.7%)检出sea, 31例外伤性脑损伤患者中有9例(29.0%)检出sea, 17例其他结构性病因中有4例(23.5%)检出sea, 5例代谢病因中有1例(20.0%)检出sea, 32例痴呆患者中有9例(28.1%)检出sea, 29例病因不明患者中有13例(44.8%)检出sea。以CVD组为参考,EA检测的比值比为:创伤性脑损伤为1.60,其他结构病因为1.32,代谢病因为0.98,痴呆为1.57,未知病因为4.10。病因不明组检出率明显高于CVD组(p = 0.010)。结论病因不明组检出率高可能提示存在潜伏病因,癫痫活动高,CVD组检出率低可能反映电生理不活跃病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unknown etiology group of late onset epilepsy more likely to show epileptiform EEG abnormalities than cerebrovascular disease group

Objective

To determine whether the cerebrovascular disease (CVD) group of late-onset epilepsy shows lower detection rates of interictal and ictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) using routine EEG than other etiology groups.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had first seizure at age 65 years or older. The detection of EAs was investigated as well as background factors including age at EEG, timing of EEG after the last seizure, recording time of EEG, EEG-vigilance, and antiseizure medications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the detection rate of EAs between etiologies.

Results

EAs were detected in 53 (27 %) of 196 patients with late-onset epilepsy: 17 (20.7 %) of 82 patients with CVD, 9 (29.0 %) of 31 with traumatic brain injury, 4 (23.5 %) of 17 with other structural etiologies, 1 (20.0 %) of 5 with metabolic etiology, 9 (28.1 %) of 32 with dementia, and 13 (44.8 %) of 29 with unknown etiology. The odds ratios for EA detection, using the CVD group as the reference, were 1.60 for traumatic brain injury, 1.32 for other structural etiologies, 0.98 for metabolic etiology, 1.57 for dementia, and 4.10 for unknown etiology. The unknown etiology group showed significantly higher detection rate than the CVD group (p = 0.010).

Conclusion

The higher detection rate in the unknown etiology group may indicate the presence of latent etiologies with high epileptic activity, while the lower detection rate in the CVD group may reflect electrophysiologically inactive lesions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信